Cover not available

In:The Present Perfect and the Preterite in Late Modern and Contemporary English: A corpus-based study of grammatical change
Xinyue Yao
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 114] 2024
► pp. 205–222

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

References

Published online: 8 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.114.refs
Aaron, Jessi E. 2010. Pushing the envelope: Looking beyond the variable context. Language Variation and Change 22(1): 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Abraham, Werner. 1999. Preterite decay as a European areal phenomenon. Folia Linguistica 33(1–2): 11–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akaike, Hirotugu. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19(6): 716–723. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Algeo, John. 1991. Language. In The Reader’s Companion to American History, Eric Foner & John A. Garraty (eds), 637–640. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. External history. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Volume VI: English in North America, John Algeo (ed.), 1–58. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. British or American English? Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ambrazas, Vytautas. 1997. Lithuanian Grammar. Vilnius: Baltos Lankos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. On the origin of Slavic aspects: Aorist and imperfect. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21(1): 17–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Kristen L. 2021. Immigration in American History. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arkadiev, Peter & Wiemer, Björn. 2018. Perfects in Baltic and Slavic. In Perfects in Indo-European Languages and Beyond (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 352), Robert Crellin & Thomas Jügel (eds), 123–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas. 2004. Discourse topic. Theoretical Linguistics 30(2–3): 163–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Scientific discourse across history: A combined multi-dimensional/rhetorical analysis of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 45–65. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald R., Fermín, Moscoso & Prado, Martín. 2005. Semantic density and past-tense formation in three Germanic languages. Language 81(3): 666–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent. 1994. Conversational implicature. Mind and Language 9(2): 124–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. Quantification, qualification, and context: A reply to Stanley and Szabo. Mind and Language 15(2–3): 262–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baily, Samuel L. 1999. Immigrants in the Lands of Promise: Italians in Buenos Aires and New York City, 1870–1914. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, Paul. 2018. American and British English: Divided by a Common Language? Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Sociolinguistics and Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bao, Chenyao, Zhang, Xiaowen, Qu, Yunhua & Feng, Zhiwei. 2017. American English perfect construction across registers. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 25(4): 314–341. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartsch, Renate. 1984. Norms, tolerance, lexical change, and context-dependent meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 8(3): 367–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Gero. 1970. The English “perfect” reconsidered. Journal of Linguistics 6(2): 189–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernaisch, Tobias, Gries, Stefan T. & Mukherjee, Joybrato. 2014. The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide 35(1): 7–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowie, Jill & Aarts, Bas. 2012. Change in the English infinitival perfect construction. In Handbook on the History of English: Rethinking Approaches to the History of English, Terttu Nevalainen & Elizabeth Closs Traugott (eds), 200–210. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Compressed noun-phrase structures in newspaper discourse. In New Media Language, Jean Aitchison & Diana M. Lewis (eds), 169–181. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2019. Registers, Genres and Styles. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1989. Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text 9: 93–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based English genres from the 17th to the 20th centuries. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 688–704. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In Variation in English: Multi-Dimensional Studies, Susan Conrad & Douglas Biber (eds), 200–214. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2016. Grammatical Complexity in Academic English: Linguistic Change in Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. London: Longman. (Also published as Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 1991. Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bock, Kathryn & Loebell, H. 1990. Framing sentences. Cognition 35(1): 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breiman, Leo. 2001. Random forests. Machine Learning 45(1): 5–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brezina, Vaclav & Meyerhoff, Miriam. 2014. Significant or random? A critical review of sociolinguistic generalisations based on large corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19(1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems: Aspectualizers and Post-Verbal Particles. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. The differentiation of statives and perfects in Early Modern English: The development of the conclusive perfect. In Towards a Standard English 1600–1800, Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), 135–170. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Jonathan C. 2010. A Brief History of Argentina. Freedom CA: Lexington Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brunner, Karl. 1962. Die Englische Sprache: Ihre Geschlichtliche Entwicklung 2 [The English Language: Its Historical Development]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1963. An Outline of Middle English Grammar, translated by Grahame, K. W. Johnston. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryce, Benjamin. 2018. To Belong in Buenos Aires: Germans, Argentines, and the Rise of a Pluralist Society. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation Between Meaning and Form [Typological Studies in Language 9]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carey, Kathleen. 1994. Pragmatics, Subjectivity, and the Grammaticalization of the English Perfect. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
. 1995. Subjectification and the development of the English perfect. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds), 83–102. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caro, G. 1899. Das englische Perfectum und Praeteritum in ihrem Verhältnis zu einander historisch untersucht [The English perfect and preterite in their relationship to each other historically examined]. Anglia 21: 56–88. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cartagena, Nelson. 1999. Los tiempos compuestos (The composite tenses). In Gramática Descriptiva de la Lengua Española [Descriptive Grammar of the Spanish language], Vol. 2, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2935–2477. Madrid: Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catalán, Diego. 1964. El español en Canarias. Ediciones Cultura Hispánica 1: 239–280.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cedergren, Henrietta J. & Sankoff, David. 1974. Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language 50(2): 333–355. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clancy, Steven J. 2010. The Chain of Being and Having in Slavic [Studies in Language Companion Series 122]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, Jacob. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Peters, Pam. 2004. Australian English: Morphology and syntax. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 2: Morphology and Syntax, Bernd Kortmann, Edgar W. Schneider, Kate Burridge, Rajend Mesthrie, & Clive Upton (eds), 593–610. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Copple, Mary T. 2011. Tracking the constraints on a grammaticalizing perfect(ive). Language Variation and Change 23(2): 163–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cordin, Patrizia. 1997. Tense, mood and aspect in the verb. In The Dialects of Italy, Martin Maiden & Mair Paerry (eds), 87–98. Routledge: London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cotter, Colleen. 2010. News Talk: Investigating the Language of Journalism. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English: Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curme, George O. 1931. A Grammar of the English language, Vol. III: Syntax. Boston MA: D. C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Currel, Hortènsia. 1990. The Present Perfect in English and in Catalan: Uses and Meanings. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Areal tendencies in tense-aspect systems. In Temporal Reference, Aspect and Actionality, Vol. 2: Typological Perspectives, Pier Marco Bertinetto, Bianchi Valentina, Östen Dahl, & Mario Squartini (eds), 11–28. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1996. Das Tempussystem des Deutschen im typologischen Vergleich. In Deutsch-Typologisch, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds), 359–368. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Hedin, Eva. 2000. Current relevance and event reference. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 385–401. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen & Velupillai, Viveka. 2013. The past tense. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. 〈[URL]〉 (26 July 2019).
Dauzat, Albert. 1937. Le flécissement du passé simple et de l’imparfait du subjonctif [The weakening of the simple past and the imperfective of the subjunctive]. Français Moderne 5: 97–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Christopher. 2007. Divided by a Common Language: A Guide to British and American English. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2012. Expanding horizons in historical linguistics with the 400-million word Corpus of Historical American English. Corpora 7(2): 121–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Corpus-based studies of lexical and semantic variation: The importance of both corpus size and corpus design. In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen, & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 66–87. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davydova, Julia. 2011. The Present Perfect in Non-Native Englishes: A Corpus-Based Study of Variation. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Acosta, Diego. 2013. The Old English have-Perfect and its congeners. Journal of English Linguistics 41(1): 33–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Swart, Henriette. 2007. A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the Perfect. Journal of Pragmatics 39(12): 2273–2307.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Declerck, Renaat. 2006. The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase, Vol. 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Defromont, Hubert J. 1973. Les constructions perfectives du verbe Anglais contemporain: Étude comparée de l’aspect transcendant dans les systèmes verbaux Anglais et Français [The Perfective Constructions of the Contemporary English Verb: Comparative Study of the Transcendent Aspect in the English and French Verbal Systems]. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, David. 1993. English Historical Syntax. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 92–329. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Depraetere, Ilse. 1998. On the resultative character of present perfect sentences. Journal of Pragmatics 29(5): 597–613. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deshors, Sandra C. 2020. English as a Lingua Franca: A random forests approach to particle placement in multi-speaker interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30(2): 214–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Contextualizing past tenses in L2: Combined effects and interactions in the present perfect versus simple past alternation. Applied Linguistics 42(2): 269–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diewald, Gabriele. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In New Reflections on Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 49], Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds), 103–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dilts, Philip. 2013. Modelling Phonetic Reduction in a Corpus of Spoken English Using Random Forests and Mixed-Effects Regression. PhD dissertation, University of Alberta.
Donaldson, Bruce. 2008. Dutch: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dowty, David R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Drinka, Bridget. 2003. Areal factors in the development of the European periphrastic perfect. Word 54(1): 1–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Sources of auxilation in the perfects of Europe. Studies in Language 37(3): 599–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Language Contact in Europe: The Periphrastic Perfect Through History. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBois, John W., Chafe, Wallace L., Meyer, Charles & Thompson, Sandra A. 2000. Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American English Part-I (LDC2000S85). Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eberenz-Greoles, Rolf. 1979. La categoria temporal del verb català i el problema del temps en la dimensió textual [The temporary category of the Catalan verb and the time problem in the textual dimension]. In Estudis de Llengua i Literatura Catalanes oferts a R. Aramon i Serra [Estudis Universitaris Catalans XXII], 169–180. Barcelona: Curial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eijck, Jan & Hans, Kamp. 1997. Representing discourse in context. In Handbook of Logic and Language, Johan van Benthem & Alice G. B. ter Meulen (eds), 179–237. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elsness, Johan. 1997. The Perfect and the Preterite in Contemporary and Earlier English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engel, Dulcie M. & Ritz, Marie-Eve. 2000. The use of the present perfect in Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 20(2): 119–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ennis, Juan Antonio. 2015. Italian-Spanish contact in early 20th century Argentina. Journal of Language Contact 8(1): 112–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Escobar, Anna María. 1997. Contrastive and innovative uses of the present perfect and the preterite in Spanish in contact with Quechua. Hispania 80(4): 859–870. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1996. Border crossings: Discourse and social change in contemporary societies. In Change and Language, Hywel Coleman & Lynne Cameron (eds). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenn, Peter. 1987. A Semantic and Pragmatic Examination of the English Perfect. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1972. Language Structure and Language Use. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1994. Dialect, register, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan (eds), 15–30. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fiedler, Wilfried. 1999. Tempus, Modus und Aspekt in den Sprachen Südosteuropas [Tense, modality and aspect in Southern European languages]. In Handbuch der Südosteuropa-Linguistik, Uwe Hinrichs & Uwe Büttner (eds), 487–517. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. 1997. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O’Connor, Mary C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions. Language 64(3): 501–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, David Hackett. 1989. Albion’s Seed: Four British Folkways in America. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. II: 1066–1476, Norman Blake (ed.), 207–408. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Olga & van der Wurff, Wim. 2006. Syntax. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds), 109–198. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fitzmaurice, Susan. 2002. The Familiar Letter in Early Modern English: A Pragmatic Approach [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 95]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Susan. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. From pragmatics to grammar: Diachronic reflections on complex pasts and futures in Romance. Lingua 60(2–3): 183–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløgstad, Guro. 2016. Preterit Expansion and Perfect Demise in Porteño Spanish. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fridén, Georg. 1948. Studies on the Tenses of the English Verb from Chaucer to Shakespeare, with Special Reference to the Late Sixteenth Century. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 2015. Macedonian Studies 2. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garside, Roger & Smith, Nicholas. 1997. A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In Corpus Annotation: Linguistic Information from Computer Text Corpora, Roger Garside, Geoffrey Leech & Tony McEnery (eds), 102–121. London: Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly. 2016. Cyclical change continued: An introduction. In Cyclical Change Continued [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 3–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giger, Markus. 2003. Resultativkonstruktionen im Modernen Tschechischen (unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der Übrigen Slavischen Sprachen) [Resultative Constructions in Modern Czech (Taking into Account the History of Languages and Other Slavic languages)]. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Kongruenzbrüche in slovakischen possessiven Resultativa (Evidenz aus dem slovakischen Nationalkorpus) [Incongruence in Slovak possessive resultatives: Evidence from the Slovak National Corpus]. Jazykovedný časopis 67(3): 283–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1973. The time-axis phenomenon. Language 49(4): 890–925. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1976. Topic, pronoun and grammatical agreement. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 149–188. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. On Understanding Grammar. New York NY: Academic Press. (Also published as Givón, T. 2018. On Understanding Grammar, Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1991. Introduction to Early Modern English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney. 1991. ICE: The International Corpus of English. English Today 7(4): 3–7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language Universals, with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 66(3): 377–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan T. 2006. Some proposals towards more rigorous corpus linguistics. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 54(2): 191–202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1): 95–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. On classification trees and random forests in corpus linguistics: Some words of caution and suggestions for improvement. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16(3): 617–647. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Statistics for Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grimes, Joseph E. 1975. The Thread of Discourse. The Hague: Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(1): 199–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Hasan, Ruqaiya. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K., Macintosh, Angus & Strevens, Peter. 1964. The Linguistic Sciences and Language Teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harre, Catherine E. 1991. Tener + Past Participle: A Case Study in Language Description. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasse, Martin. 1994. Tense and aspect in Basque. In Tense Systems in European Languages, Rolf Thieroff & Joachim Ballweg (eds), 279–292. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, Martin. 1982. The “past simple” and “present perfect” in Romance. In Studies in the Romance Verb, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds), 42–70. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2001. The European Linguistic Area: Standard Average European. In Language Typology and Language Universals, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher, & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1492–1510. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86(3): 663–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hedin, Eva. 1995. The tense aspect system of Modern Greek. In Tense Systems in European Languages, II, Rolf Thieroff (ed.), 233–252. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Claudi, Ulrike & Hünnemeyer, Friederike. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2005. Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Contact and grammaticalization. In The Handbook of Language Contact, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 93–112. London: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Carlos. 2010. El pretérito perfecto compuesto del español de Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay: Aspectos semánticos y discursivos [The Perfect Compound Past Tense in the Spanish of Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay: Semantic and Discursive Aspects]. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.
Hernández, José E. 2006. Present perfect for preterit in Salvadoran narratives: The perfective expansion into narrative discourse. In Selected Proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Nuria Sagarra & Almeida Jacqueline Toribio (eds), 297–307. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Philip & Hinchliffe, Ian. 2013. Swedish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1: Theoretical and Methodological Issues [Typological Studies in Language 19:1], Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds), 17–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A. 1980. Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language 56(2): 251–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horrock, Geoffrey. 1997. Greek: A History of the Language and Its Speakers. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hosmer Jr., David W., Lemeshow, Stanley & Sturdivant, Rodney X. 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. Toronto: John Wiley and Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howe, Chad. 2013. The Spanish Perfects: Pathways of Emergent Meaning. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hristov, Bozhil. 2020. Grammaticalising the Perfect and Explanations of Language Change: Have- and be-perfects in the History and Structure of English and Bulgarian. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 2002. The verb. In The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language, Rodney Huddleston & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 71–212. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hudson, Richard A. 1996. Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2009. Colonial lag, colonial innovation or simply language change? In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences Between British and American English, Günter Rohdenburg & Julia Schlüter (eds), 13–37. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Smith, Nicolas. 2009. The present perfect in British and American English: Has there been any change, recently? ICAME Journal 33: 45–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Izvorski, Roumyana. 2003. Observations about the form and meaning of the perfect. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 101–132. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1984. The structure of the Russian verb. In Russian and Slavic Grammar, Linda R. Waugh & Morris Halle (eds), 1–15. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget L. 2013. A Variationist Approach to Cross-Register Language Variation and Change. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Jara Yupanqui, Ileana Margarita. 2006. The Use of the Preterite and the Present Perfect in the Spanish of Lima. PhD dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
Jespersen, Otto. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Copenhagen: A.F. Høst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. New York NY: Norton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1931. A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles, Part IV: Syntax, Vol. 3: Time and Tense. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kandolf, Cindy. 1993. On the difference between explicatures and implicatures in relevance theory. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 16: 33–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kany, Charles E. 1951. American-Spanish Syntax. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne & Barlow, Michael. 2000. Introduction: A usage-based conception of language. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow & Suzanne Kemmer (eds), i–xxvii. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kiefer, Ulrike. 1994. Die Tempusformen im Jiddischen [The tense forms in Yiddish]. In Tense Systems in European Languages, Rolf Thieroff & Joachim Ballweg (eds), 135–148. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam. 2005. Language is never, ever, ever, random. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(2): 263–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klee, Carol A. & Lynch, Andrew. 2009. El Español en Contacto con Otras Lenguas [Spanish in Contact with Other Languages]. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang. 1992. The present perfect puzzle. Language 68(3): 525–552. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. How time is encoded. In The Expression of Time, Wolfgang Klein & Ping Li (eds), 40–81. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kranich, Svenja. 2010. Progressive in Modern English: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization and Related Changes. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krapp, George Philip. 1925. The English Language in America, Vol. 1. New York NY: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kretzschmar, William A. 2004. Standard American English pronunciation. In A Handbook of Varieties of English, Vol. 1: Phonology, Edgar Schneider, Kate Burridge, Bernd Kortmann, Rajend Mesthrie & Clive Upton (eds), 257–269. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1989. Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expressions, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Peter van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1931. Handbook of Present-Day English, Vol. 1. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Kuppevelt, Jan. 1995a. Discourse structure, topicality and questioning. Journal of Linguistics 31(1): 109–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995b. Main structure and side structure in discourse. Linguistics 33(4): 809–833. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1975. The evolution of grammatical categories. Esquisses Linguistiques II: 38–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja. 1997. Be/have + past participle: The choice of the auxiliary with intransitives from Late Middle to Modern English. In English in Transition: Corpus-Based Studies in Linguistic Variation and Genre Styles, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö & Kirsi He ikkonen (eds), 18–85. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
L’Hermitte, René. 1978. La Phrase Nominale en Russe [The Nominal Phrase in Russian]. Paris: Institut d’ Études Slaves.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Arlington VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45(4): 715–762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972a. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972b. Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society 1(1): 97–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1982. Building on empirical foundations. In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 24], Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 17–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William & Waletzky, Joshua. 1997. Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History 7(1–4): 3–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1988. A usage-based model. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 50], Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), 121–161. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In Usage-Based Models of Language, Michael Barlow and Suzanne Kemmer (eds), 1–64. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 2006. Phonology and morphology. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds), 44–108. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1971. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. 100 million words of English. English Today 9(1): 9–15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey, Hundt, Marianne, Mair, Christian & Smith, Nicholas. 2009. Change in Contemporary English: A Grammatical Study. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Legendre, Géraldine. 2007. On the typology of auxiliary selection. Lingua 117(9): 1522–1540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge MA: The MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Conditional inference trees and random forests. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, Magali Paquot & Stefan T. Gries (eds), 611–645. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., Thompson, Sandra A. & Thompson, R. M. 1982. The discourse motivation for the perfect aspect: the Mandarin particle LE. In Tense-Aspect: Between Semantics and Pragmatics, Paul Hopper (ed), 19–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. The perfect – aspectual, temporal and evidential. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Östen Dahl (ed.), 365–384. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lope Blanch, Juan M. 1972. Sobre el uso del pretérito en el español de México [On the use of the preterite in Mexican Spanish]. Estudios Sobre el Español de México 2: 131–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher & Willis, David. 2012. Never again: The multiple grammaticalization of never as a marker of negation in English. English Language and Linguistics 16(3): 459–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundskær-Nielsen, Tom & Holmes, Philip. 2010. Danish: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macleod, Morgan. 2014. Synchronic variation in the Old English perfect. Transactions of the Philological Society 112(3): 319–343. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2006. Tracking ongoing grammatical change and recent diversification in present-day standard English: The complementary role of small and large corpora. In The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics: Papers from the 24th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora [ICAME 24], Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 355–376. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. British English/American English grammar: Convergence in writing – divergence in speech? Anglia 125(1): 84–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Economie des Changements Phonétiques. Traité de Phonologie Diachronique. Berne: A. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2020. Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend, Swann, Joan, Deumert, Ana & Leap, William L. 2009. Introducing Sociolinguistics. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1912. L’évolution des formes grammaticales [The evolution of grammatical forms]. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12/26: 384–400.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mendoza, Imke. 2018. Possessive resultative constructions in Old and Middle Polish. In Diachronic Slavonic syntax: The Interplay Between Internal Development, Language Contact and Metalinguistic Factors, Jasmin Grković-Major, Björn Hansen & Barbara Sonnenhauser (eds), 161–186. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mencken, Henry L. 1919. The American Language. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, Matthias. 1992. Das Englische Perfekt. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1971. Tense and time reference in English. In Studies in Linguistic Semantics, Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langėndoen (eds), 97–113. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1981. Notes on the English Present Perfect. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1: 81–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCoard, Robert W. 1978. The English Perfect: Tense Choice and Pragmatic Inferences. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Alexiadou, Artemis. 2010. Perfects, resultatives and auxiliaries in earlier English. Linguistic Inquiry 41(3): 389–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ter Meulen, Alice G. B. 1995. Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 1994. The ambiguity of the English present perfect. Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 111–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1998. Aspectual Grammar and Past-Time Reference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley & Gordon, Matthew. 2003. Sociolinguistics: Method and Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English Syntax, 1: Concord, the Parts of Speech, and the Sentence. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 2008. The English Resultative perfect and its relationship to the Experiential perfect and the simple past tense. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(3): 323–351. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moens, Marc & Steedman, Mark. 1988. Temporal ontology and temporal reference. Computational Linguistics 14(2): 15–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moss, Norman. 1991. British/American Language Dictionary. Lincolnwood IL: Passport Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musan, Renate. 2001. The present perfect in German: Outline of its semantic composition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19(2): 355–401. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mustanoja, Tauno F. 1960. A Middle English Syntax, I: Parts of Speech. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 2013. English historical corpora in transition: From new tools to legacy corpora? In New Methods in Historical Corpora, Paul Bennet, Martin Durrell, Silke Scheible, & Richard J. Whitt (eds), Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Atsuko. 2006. The meaning and interpretations of the Japanese aspectual marker -te-i-. Journal of Semantics 23(2): 185–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nishiyama, Atsuko & Koenig, Jean-Pierre. 2010. What is a perfect state? Language 86(3): 611–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orr, Robert. 1992. Slavo-Celtica. Canadian Slavonic Papers/Revue Canadienne des Slavistes 34(3): 245–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paden, William D. 1998. An Introduction to Old Occitan. New York NY: Modern Language Association of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pallant, Julie. 2007. SPSS Survival Manual, 3rd ed. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence. 1990. Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge MA: The MIT press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. Journal of Philosophy 70(18): 601–609. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peduzzi, Peter N., Concato, John, Kemper, Elizabeth, Holford, Theodore R., & Feinstein, Alvan R. 1996. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 99: 1373–1379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penny, Ralph. 2000. Variation and Change in Spanish. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. A History of the Spanish Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peterson, Hjalmar P. & Adams, Johnathan. 2009. Faroese: A Language Course for Beginners. Grammar. Tórshavn: Stiðin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Dion, Nathalie. 2009. Prescription vs prexis: The evolution of future temporal reference in French. Language 85(3): 557–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Tagliamonte, Sali. 1989. There’s no tense like the present: Verbal -s inflection in early Black English. Language Variation and Change 1(1): 47–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poplack, Shana & Malvar, Elisabete. 2007. Elucidating the transition period in linguistic change. Probus 19(1): 121–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Portner, Paul. 2003. The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(4): 459–510. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Perfect & progressive. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, Vol. 1, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, & Paul Portner (eds), 1217–1261. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pountain, Christopher J. 1985. Copulas, verbs of possession in Old Spanish: The evidence for structurally interdependent changes. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies 62: 337–355.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poutsma, Hendrik. 1928. A Grammar of Late Modern English. Groningen: Noordhoff.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rastall, Paul. 1999. Observations on the present perfect in English. World Englishes 18(1): 79–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Read, Allen W. 2002. British recognition of American speech in the eighteenth century. In Milestones in the History of English in America, Richard W. Bailey (ed), 37–54. Durham NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2004. Literal Meaning. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1966. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rezaee, Abbas Ali & Golparvar, Seyyed Ehsan. 2017. Conditional inference tree modelling of competing motivators of the positioning of concessive clauses: The case of a non-native corpus. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 24(2–3): 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rissanen, Matti. 1999. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: 1476 to 1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 187–321. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ritz, Marie-Eve A. & Engel, Dulcie M. 2008. “Vivid narrative use” and the meaning of the present perfect in spoken Australian English. Linguistics 46(1): 131–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Louro, Celeste. 2009. Perfect Evolution and Change: A Sociolinguistic Study of Preterit and Present Perfect in Contemporary and Earlier Argentina. PhD dissertation, University of Melbourne.
Rohdenburg, Günter & Schlüter, Julia. 2009. One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Björn. 2008. The Perfect Time Span: On the Present Perfect in German, Swedish and English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 125]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan D. 2004. Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roy, Joseph. 2014. The Perfect Approach to Adverbs: Applying Variation Theory to Competing Models. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.
Rydén, Mats & Brorstrom, Sverker. 1987. The Be/Have Variation with Intransitives in English. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, David & Thibault, Pierrette. 1981. Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. In Syntactic Change, Vol. 25, Brenda B. Johns & David R. Strong (eds), 205–216. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1980. The Social Life of Language. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard. 2009. Present perfects compete. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(2): 115–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W. 2007. Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 1994a. “Hot news” and the grammaticalization of perfects. Linguistics 32(6): 995–1028. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. & Cacoullos, Rena Torres. 2008. Defaults and indeterminacy in temporal grammaticalization: The “perfect” road to perfective. Language Variation and Change 20(1): 1–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2013. The expression of the perfect in East and South-East Asian Englishes. English World-Wide 34(1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sgall, Petr, Hajičová, Eva & Benešová, Eva. 1973. Topic, Focus and Generative Semantics. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siegel, Jeff. 2001. Koine formation and creole genesis. In Creolization and Contact [Creole Language Library 21], Norval Smith & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sinclair, John. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen. 1994. Language Contact and Change. Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S. 1997. The Parameters of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2014. Syntactic stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper language. In Late Modern English Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 311–330. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella. 2000. Gradients in auxiliary selection with intransitive verbs. Language 76(4): 859–890. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sørensen, Holger S. 1964. On the semantic unity of the perfect tense. English Studies Presented to R. W. Zandvoort on His 70th Birthday, 74–83. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Heylen, Kris & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2018. Mixed-Effects Regression Models in Linguistics. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario & Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2000. The simple and compound past in Romance languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed), 403–439. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Strobl, Carolin, Malley, James & Tutz, Gerhard. 2009. An introduction to recursive partitioning: Rationale, application and characteristics of classification and regression trees, bagging and random forests. Psychological Methods 14(4): 323–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, John M. & Feak, Christine B. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students. Ann Arbor MI: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry. 1900. A New English Grammar, Logical and Historical. Oxford: Claredon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2006. Morphosyntactic Persistence in Spoken English: A Corpus Study. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. About text frequencies in historical linguistics: Disentangling environmental and grammatical change. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 12(1): 153–171. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. An analytic-synthetic spiral in the history of English. In Cyclical Change Continued [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 227], Elly van Gelderen (ed.), 93–112. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 1995. Interjections in Early Modern English: From imitation of spoken to conventions of written language. In Historical Pragmatics, Andreas H. Jucker (ed.), 439–468. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2000. The grammaticalization of the present perfect in English: Tracks of change and continuity in a linguistic enclave. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach, & Dieter Stein (eds), 329–354. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. Comparative sociolinguistics. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, Jack K. Chambers, Peter Trudgill & Natalie Schilling-Estes (eds), 729–763. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Baayen, R. Harald. 2012. Models, forests and trees of York English: Was/were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language Variation and Change 24(2): 135–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tannen, Deborah. 1987. Repetition in conversation: Toward a poetics of talk. Language, 63(2), 574–605.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. Talking Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ternes, Elmar. 2008. The Breton language. In The Celtic Languages, Donald MacAulay (ed.), 371–452. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. On the areal distribution of tense-aspect categories in Europe. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 265–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah G. & Kaufman, Terrence. 1988. Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres Cacoullos, Rena & Walker, James. 2011. Collocations in grammaticalization and variation. In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds), 225–238. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1972. A History of English Syntax: A Transformational Approach to the History of English Sentence Structure. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Syntax. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. I: The Beginnings to 1066, Richard M. Hogg (ed.), 168–289. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: a reassessment. In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte & Hubert Cuyckens (eds), 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Dasher, Richard B. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Heine, Bernd. 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 19]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, Gradualness and Grammaticalization [Typological Studies in Language 90]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Travis, Charles. 1985. On what is strictly speaking true. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 15(2): 187–299. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Pragmatics. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Language, Bob Hale & Crispin Wright (eds), 87–107. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trnka, Bohumil. 1930. On the Syntax of the English Verb from Caxton to Dryden. Prague: Jednota Československých Matematiků a Fyzik.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2010. Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonisation and Contact. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Sociolinguistic Typology: Social Determinants of Linguistic Complexity. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter & Hannah, Jean. 2013. International English: A Guide to Varieties of English around the World. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Twaddell, William Freeman. 1968. The English Verb Auxiliaries. Providence RI: Brown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
United States Census Office. 1901. Twelfth Census of the United States, Census Reports, Vol. 1: Population, Part 1, 〈[URL]〉 (2 June 2022).
United States Immigration and Naturalization Service. 2003. Statistical Yearbook of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Aspect and the English present perfect: What can be coded? In Aspect in Grammatical Variation [Studies in Language Variation 6], James A. Walker (ed.), 49–64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanneck, Gerard. 1958. The colloquial preterite in Modern American English. Word 14(2–3): 237–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verkuyl, Henk J. 1993. A Theory of Aspectuality: The Interaction Between Temporal and Atemporal Structure. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Frederik T. 1966. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part II: Syntactical Units with One Verb (Continued). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Visser, Frederik h. 1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, Part III. 2nd Half: Syntactical Units with Two and with More Verbs. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vittinghoff, Eric, Glidden, David V., Shiboski, Stephen C. & McCulloch, Charles E. 2011. Regression Methods in Biostatistics: Linear, Logistic, Survival, and Repeated Measures Models. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walker, Jim. 2008. The footballer’s perfect – Are footballers leading the way? In The Linguistics of Football, Eva Lavric, Gerhard Piset, Andrew Skinner & Wolfgang Stadler (eds), 295–303. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. The present perfect has only gone and changed, hasn’t it? The continuing divergence of the narrative perfect. In Aorists and Perfects: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Marc Fryd & Pierre-Don Giancarli (eds), 25–41. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wardhaugh, Ronald. 2010. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 2000. An American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weiner, E. Judith & Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1): 29–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William, & Herzog, Marvin. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, Winfred P. Lehmann & Yakov Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin. 2014. The Present Perfect in World Englishes: Charting Unity and Diversity. Bamberg: Bamberg University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, Valentin, Seoane, Elena & Suárez-Gómez, Cristina. 2016. Re-assessing the Present Perfect. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westin, Ingrid. 2002. Language Change in English Newspaper Editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westmoreland, Maurice. 1988. The distribution and the use of the present perfect and the past perfect forms in American Spanish. Hispania 71(2): 379–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 1988. Occitan. In The Romance Languages, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds), 246–278. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiemer, Björn & Giger, Markus. 2005. Resultativa in den Nordslavischen und Baltischen Sprachen: Bestandsaufnahme unter Arealen und Grammatikalisierungstheoretischen Gesichtspunkten [Resultatives in the North Slavic and Baltic languages: Taking Stock from an Areal and Grammatical Theoretical Perspective]. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1–2): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Relevance theory. In The Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2004. The have-perfect in Old English. In New Perspectives on English Historical Linguistics [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 251], Christian J. Kay, Simon Horobin, & Jeremy Smith (eds), 243–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 1998. American English: Dialects and Variation. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yáñez-Bouza, Nuria. 2011. ARCHER past and present (1990–2010). ICAME Journal 35: 205–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yao, Xinyue & Collins, Peter. 2012. The present perfect in world Englishes. World Englishes 31(3): 386–403. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Recent change in non-present perfect constructions in British and American English. Corpora 8(1): 115–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zandvoort, Reinard W. 1962. A Handbook of English Grammar. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Rüdiger. 1972. Structural change in the English auxiliary system: On the replacement of be by have. Folia Linguistica 6(1–2): 107–117.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue