Cover not available

In:Corpus Use in Cross-linguistic Research: Paving the way for teaching, translation and professional communication
Edited by Marlén Izquierdo and Zuriñe Sanz-Villar
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 113] 2023
► pp. 34–50

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Light Verb Constructions in English-Spanish translation

What corpora can tell us

 | University of León
Published online: 2 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.113.02rab
Light Verb Constructions (LVCs) are combinations of a partially delexicalized verb and a noun indicating an action or an event (e. g., give a description). Studies modelled on the Meaning-Text theory and qualia roles of the Generative Lexicon model propose that LVCs combine nouns and verbs according to shared underlying, underspecified semantic features. This paper explores these features’ role in translating English LVCs into Spanish. Data come from the parallel corpus P-ACTRES 2.0, including fiction and nonfiction materials. Results indicate that translation choices for LVCs with have, take, make/do, and give are governed by the same notions of transference, inception, and volition that determine their combinatorial compatibility. Register also seems to influence the choice. This information may prove significant to machine translation, bi/multilingual writing support, and post-editing.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Light Verb Constructions
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Alonso Ramos, Margarita. 2004. Las construcciones con verbos de apoyo. Madrid: Visor.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Towards the synthesis of support verb constructions. In Selected Lexical and Grammatical Issues in the Meaning – Text Theory. In honour of Igor Mel’čuk [Studies in Language Companion Series 84], Leon Wanner (ed.), 139–166. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bosque, Ignacio. 2001. On the weight of light predicates. In Features and Interfaces in Romance. Essays in honor of Heles Contreras [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 222], Julia Herschensohn, Enrique Mallén & Karen Zagona (eds), 23–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a. La direccionalidad en los diccionarios combinatorios y el problema de la selección léxica. In Lingüística teórica. Análisi i perspectives, Teresa Cabré (ed.), 13–58. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2004b. Redes. Diccionario combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(ed.). 2006. Diccionario práctico combinatorio del español contemporáneo. Madrid: SM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2016. Light verbs are just regular verbs. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 22(1): 51–60. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brugman, Claudia, 2001. Light verbs and polysemy, Language Sciences 23(4): 551–578. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2003. The light verb jungle. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 1–9.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex Predicates: Cross-linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48–78. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Miguel, Elena. 2011. En qué consiste ser verbo de apoyo. In 60 problemas de gramática dedicados a Ignacio Bosque, M. Victoria Escandell Vidal, Manuel Leonetti & Cristina Sánchez López (eds), 139–147. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Construcciones con verbos de apoyo en español. De cómo entran los nombres en la órbita de los verbos. In Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL), Inés Olza Moreno, Manuel Casado Velarde & Ramón González Ruiz (eds), 567–578. Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. La polisemia de los verbos soporte. Propuesta de definición mínima. In Los verbos en los diccionarios, Sergi Torner Castells & Elisenda Bernal Gallén (eds). Anexos Revista de Lexicografía 20: 67–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frawley, William. 1984. Prolegomenon to a theory of translation. In Translation: Literary, Linguistic and Philosophical Perspectives, William Frawley (ed.), 159–175. University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Gaston & De Pontonx, Sophie (eds). 2004. Verbes supports. Special issue of Lingvisticae Investigationes 27(2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koike, Kazumi. 2001. Colocaciones léxicas en el español actual: Estudio formal y léxicosemántico. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá/Takushoku University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, Stefan. 2005. A linguistic test battery for support verb constructions. Lingvisticae Investigationes 27(2): 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2006. A Glossary of English Grammar. Edinburgh: EUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mel’čuk, Igor A. 1996. Lexical functions. A tool for the description of lexical relations in a lexicon. In Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing [Studies in Language Companion Series 31], Leo Wanner (ed.), 37–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1997. Vers une linguistique Sens-Texte. Paris: Collègue de France.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. Verbes supports sans peine. Lingvisticae Investigationes 27(2): 203–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, István, Berend, Gábor, Móra, György & Vincze, Veronika. 2011. Domain-dependent detection of light verb constructions. In Proceedings of the Student Research Workshop associated with RANLP 2011, 1–8. Hissar, Bulgaria, 13 September 2011. <[URL]> (26 May 2023).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nagy, István T., Rácz, Anita & Vincze, Veronika. 2020. Detecting light verb constructions across languages. Natural Language Engineering 26(3), 319–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nenonen, Marja Juha Mulli, Nikolaev, Alexandre & Penttilä, Esa. 2017. How light can a light verb be? Predication patterns in V + NP constructions in English, Finnish, German and Russian. In Empirical Approaches to Cognitive Linguistics: Analyzing Real-Life Data, Milla Luodonpää-Manni, Esa Penttilä & Johanna Viimaranta (eds), 75–106. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piao, Scott S., Rayson, Paul, Archer, Dawn & McEnery, Tony. 2005. Comparing and combining a semantic tagger and a statistical tool for MWE extraction. Computer Speech & Language 19(4): 378–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piera, Carlos & Varela, Soledad. 1999. Relaciones entre morfología y sintaxis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 4367–4422. Madrid: Real Academia Española/ Espasa-Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The semantics of lexical underspecification. Folia Linguistica 32(3–4): 323–348. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rabadán, Rosa, Pizarro, Isabel & Sanjurjo-González, Hugo. 2021. Authoring support for Spanish language writers: A genre-restricted case study. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada 34(2): 671–711. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanjurjo-González, Hugo & Izquierdo, Marlén. 2019. P-ACTRES 2.0: A parallel corpus for cross-linguistic research. In Parallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies: New Resources and Applications [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 90], Irene Doval & M. Teresa Sánchez Nieto (eds), 215–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanromán Vilas, Begoña. 2009. Diferencias semánticas entre construcciones con verbo de apoyo y sus correlatos verbales simples. ELUA. Estudios de Lingüística de la Universidad de Alicante 23: 289–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012a. La hipótesis de la compatibilidad semántica en la selección de los verbos de apoyo. In Tradición y progreso en la lingüística general, Emilio Ridruejo Alonso, Teresa Solías Arís, Nieves Mendizábal de la Cruz & Sara Alonso Calvo (eds), 355–372. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012b. La representación de las relaciones espaciales en la descripción de los verbos de apoyo. In Meaning, Texts and other Exciting Things. A Festschrift to Commemorate the 80th Anniversary of Professor Igor Alexandrovic Mel’cuk (Studia Philologica), Jurij Apresjan, Igor Boguslavsky, Marie-Claude L’Homme, Leonid Iomdin, Jasmina Milicevic, Alain Polguère & Leo Wanner (eds), 538–553. Moscow: Jazyki slajanskoj kultury. <[URL]> (26 May 2023).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. In search of semantic links between nouns and light verbs. Some evidence from Spanish. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Meaning-Text Theory (MTT2013), Valentina Apresjan, Boris Iomdin & Ekaterina Ageeva (eds), 163–175. Prague.
. 2014. La alternancia dar/hacer en construcciones con verbo de apoyo y nombre de comunicación. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 3(2): 185–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. The role of determiners in Spanish light verb constructions. Word 61(2): 178–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. From the heavy to the light verb: An analysis of tomar ‘to take.’ Lingvistica Investigationes 40(2): 228–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer, Andrew. 2013. Lexical Relatedness: A Paradigm-Based Model. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
UCREL Research Centre. 2022. PyMUSAS 0.3.0 <[URL]> (26 May 2023).
Vinay, Jean-Paul & Dalbernet, Jean. 1958. Stylistique comparée du français et de l’anglais: Méthode de traduction. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vincze, Veronika, Nagy, István & Berend, Gábor. 2011. Detecting noun compounds and light verb constructions: A contrastive study. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multiword Expressions: From Parsing and Generation to the Real World (MWE 2011), 116–121, Portland OR: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Full-coverage identification of English light verb constructions. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Ruslan Mitkov & Jong C. Park (eds), 329–337. Nagoya: Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue