References (26)
References
Allison, S. D., Heuser, R., Jockers, M. L., Moretti, F., & Witmore, M. (2011). Quantitative formalism: An experiment. Stanford Literary Lab.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aull, L. (2020). How students write: A linguistic analysis. Modern Language Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker, P. (2004). Querying keywords: Questions of difference, frequency, and sense in keywords analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 32(4), 346–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bellasio, J., Grand-Clement, S., Iqbal, S., Marcellino, W., Lynch, A., Abdelfatah, Y., Richardson-Golinski, T., Cox, K., & Persi Paoli, G. (2021). Insights from the Bin Laden Archive: Inventory of research and knowledge and initial assessment and characterisation of the Bin Laden Archive. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL]
Brown, R., Marcellino, M., Van Hegewald, E., John, E., Salas, A., & Matthews, M. (2021). Rapid analysis of foreign malign information on COVID-19 in the Indo-Pacific: A proof-of-concept study. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL]
Claes, J., & Ortiz López, L. A. (2011). Restricciones pragmáticas y sociales en la expresión de futuridad en el español de Puerto Rico [Pragmatic and social restrictions in the expression of the future in Puerto Rican Spanish]. Spanish in Context, 8, 50–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv:1810.04805.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Etzioni, O., Banko, M., & Cafarella, M. (2006). Machine reading. AAAI, 6, 1517–1519.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayles, K. (2010). How we read: Close, hyper, machine. ADE Bulletin, 150(18), 62–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hope, J., & Witmore, M. The very large textual object: A prosthetic reading of Shakespeare. Early Modern Literary Studies, 9(3), 1–36.
Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse. Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, C., & Marcellino, W. (2022). Bag-of-words algorithms can supplement transformer sequence classification & improve model interpretability. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL]
Kaufer, D., & Parry-Giles, S. (2017). Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign memoirs: A study in contrasting identities. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 103(1/2): 7–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kavanagh, J., Marcellino, M., Blake, J. S., Smith, S., Davenport, S., & Gizaw, M. (2019). News in a digital age: Comparing the presentation of news information over time and across media platforms. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL].
Li, Y., Thomas, M., & Liu, D. (2021). From semantics to pragmatics: Where IS can lead in Natural Language Processing (NLP) research. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 569–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcellino, W. (2014). Talk like a Marine: USMC linguistic acculturation and civil–military argument. Discourse Studies, 16(3), 385–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcellino, M., Cragin, K., Mendelsohn, J., Cady, A., Magnuson, M., & Reedy, K. (2017). Measuring the popular resonance of Daesh’s propoganda. Journal of Strategic Security, 10(1), 4. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcellino, W., Johnson, C., Posard, M. N., & Helmus, T. C. (2020a). Foreign interference in the 2020 election: Tools for detecting online election interference. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL].
Marcellino, W., Cox, K., Galai, K., Slapakova, L., Jaycocks, A., & Harris, R. (2020b). Human-machine detection of online-based malign information. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL].
Marcellino, W., Helmus, T., Kerrigan, J., Reininger, H., Karimov, R., & Lawrence, R. (2021). Detecting conspiracy theories on social media: Improving machine learning to detect and understand online conspiracy theories. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL]
Moretti, F. (2005). Graphs, maps, trees: Abstract models for a literary history. Verso.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oakes, M. (1998). Statistics for corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rich, M. (2018). Truth decay: An initial exploration of the diminishing role of facts and analysis in American public life. Rand Corporation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronowicz, E., & Rittidech, K. (2006). The Sapir Whorf hypothesis and translation or the power and weakness of language. The Journal of the Faculty Arts, 2(2), 21–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(5), 206–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szayna, T., Larson, E., O’Mahony, A., Robson, S., Gereben, A., Schaefer Matthews, M., Polich, J., Ayer, L., Eaton, D., Marcellino, W., Kraus, L., Posard, M., Syme, J., Winkelman, Z., Wright, C., Cotugno, C., & Welser, W. (2016). Considerations for integrating women into closed occupations in U.S. special operations forces. RAND Corporation. Retrieved on 24 January 2023 from [URL]
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ishizaki, Suguru & Belén López-Arroyo
2025. From Sensory to Narrative: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Wine-Tasting Notes in International Contexts. Journal of Business and Technical Communication DOI logo
Sanz-Valdivieso, Lucía
2024. Technology-Powered Multilingual Professional and Technical Writing: An Integrative Literature Review of Landmark and the Latest Writing Assistance Tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 67:3  pp. 301 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue