Cover not available

In:Corpora and Rhetorically Informed Text Analysis: The diverse applications of DocuScope
Edited by David West Brown and Danielle Zawodny Wetzel
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 109] 2023
► pp. 25–40

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Introduction and overview to the volume

 | Carnegie Mellon University
 | University of Lethbridge
 | Carnegie Mellon University
Published online: 29 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.109.02bro
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Dictionary-based taggers and DocuScope
  • 3.The uses and misuses of dictionaries
  • 4.DocuScope, rhetoric, and composition
  • 5.DocuScope and rhetorical problem-solving
    • 5.1Metacognitive knowledge
    • 5.2Critical discourse knowledge
    • 5.3Discourse community values
    • 5.4Genre knowledge
    • 5.5Substantive knowledge
    • 5.6Communication task processes
  • References
References (43)
References
Ajšić, A. (2021). Capturing Herder: A three-step approach to the identification of language ideologies using corpus linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Corpora, 16(1), 63–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrews, R. (2012). Rebirth of rhetoric: Essays in language and education. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aull, L. (2015). Linguistic attention. Composition Forum, 31. Retrieved on 20 January 2023 from [URL]
(2019). Linguistic markers of stance and genre in upper-level student writing. Written Communication, 36(2), 267–295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazerman, C. (2016). A genre based theory of literate action. In N. Artemeva & A. Freedman (Eds.), Genre studies around the globe: Beyond the three traditions (pp. 80–94). Trafford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, D. W., & Laudenbach, M. (2021). Stylistic variation in email. Register Studies, 4(1), 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chung, C. K., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2012). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC): Pronounced “Luke,” … and other useful facts. In P. M. McCarthy & C. Boonthum-Denecke (Eds.), Applied natural language processing: Identification, investigation and resolution (pp. 206–229). IGI Global. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Classen, A. (2021). Transdisciplinarity – A bold way into the academic future, from a European medievalist perspective and or the rediscovery of philology? Humanities, 10(3), 96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corrigan, J. A., & Slomp, D. H. (2021). Articulating a sociocognitive construct of writing expertise for the digital age. Journal of Writing Analytics, 5, 142–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Curtius, E. R. (1948). Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter. A. Francke.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deng, Q., Hine, M. J., Ji, S., & Sur, S. (2018). Inside the black box of dictionary building for text analytics: A design science approach. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 27(3), 119–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emig, J. (1971). The composing processes of twelfth graders. National Council of Teachers of English Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L. (1981). Problem-solving strategies for writing. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36(1), 5–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garside, R., & Smith, N. (1997). A hybrid grammatical tagger: CLAWS4. In R. Garside, G. Leech, & A. McEnery (Eds.), Corpus annotation: Linguistic information from computer text corpora (pp. 102–121). Longman. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gere, A., Curzan, A., Hammond, J. W., Hughes, S., Li, R., Moos, A., Smith, K., Van Zanen, K., Wheeler, K. L., & Zanders, C. J. (2021). Communal justicing: Writing assessment, disciplinary infrastructure, and the case for critical language awareness. College Composition and Communication, 72(3), 384–412.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graham, S. S. (2020). The opioid epidemic and the pursuit of moral medicine: A computational-rhetorical analysis. Written Communication, 38(1), 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grasso, F. (2002). Towards computational rhetoric. Informal Logic, 22(3), 195–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, R. P. (1984). Verbal style and the Presidency: A computer-based analysis. Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herndl, C. G., Fennell, B. A., & Miller, C. R. (1991/2004). Understanding failures in organizational discourse: The accident at Three Mile Island and the shuttle Challenger disaster. In C. Bazerman & J. Paradis (Eds.), Textual dynamics of the professions: Historical and contemporary studies of writing in professional communities (pp. 279–305). Retrieved on 20 January 2023 from [URL]
Hope, J., & Witmore, M. (2004). The very large textual object: A prosthetic reading of Shakespeare. Early Modern Literary Studies, 9(3), 1–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, M., & Liu, B. (2004). Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In KDD’04. Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 168–177). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Ishizaki, S., & Vlachos, P. (2005). Textual genre analysis and identification. In Y. Cai (Ed.), Ambient intelligence for scientific discovery: Foundations, theories, and systems (pp. 129–151). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufer, D., Geisler, C., Vlachos, P., & Ishizaki, S. (2006). Mining textual knowledge for writing education and research: The DocuScope project. In L. Van Waes, M. Leijten, & C. M. Neuwirth (Eds.), Writing and Digital Media (pp. 115–130). Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaufer, D., Ishizaki, S., Butler, B. S., & Collins, J. (2004). The power of words: Unveiling the speaker and writer’s hidden craft. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macbeth, K. P. (2006). Diverse, unforeseen, and quaint difficulties: The sensible responses of novices learning to follow instructions in academic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(2), 180–207. [URL]
Marcellino, W. M. (2014). Talk like a marine: USMC linguistic acculturation and civil–military argument. Discourse Studies, 16(3), 385–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. (1992). Kairos in the rhetoric of science. In S. Witte, N. Nakadate, & R. Cherry (Eds.), A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 310–347). Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word–emotion association lexicon. Computational Intelligence, 29(3), 436–465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Omizo, R., & Hart-Davidson, W. (2016a). Finding genre signals in academic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 7(3), 485–509. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016b). Hedge-O-Matic. Enculturation. A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing and Culture 7. Retrieved on 20 January 2023 from [URL]
Parry-Giles, S. J., & Kaufer, D. S. (2017). Memories of Lincoln and the splintering of American political thought. The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plett, H. F. (2010). Literary rhetoric: Concepts-structures-analyses. Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sedlak, M. (2000). You really do make an unrespectable foreigner policy… Discourse on ethnic issues in the Austrian Parliament. In R. Wodak & T. A. van Dijk (Eds.), Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states (pp. 107–168). DRAVA-Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taguchi, N., Kaufer, D., Gomez-Laich, P., & Zhao, H. (2017). A corpus linguistics analysis of on-line peer commentary. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 14, 357–170.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tootalian, J. (2017). “To corrupt a man in the midst of a verse”: Ben Jonson and the prose of the world. Ben Jonson Journal, 24(1), 46–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Dijk, T. A. (2000). The reality of racism. In G. Zurstiege (Ed.), Festschrift für die Wirklichkeit (pp. 211–225). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis (pp. 63–94). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 311–326). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, D., & Brookes, G. (2019). ‘This is England, speak English!’: A corpus-assisted critical study of language ideologies in the right-leaning British press. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(1), 56–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Young, L., & Soroka, S. (2012). Affective news: The automated coding of sentiment in political texts. Political Communication, 29(2), 205–231. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, H., & Kaufer, D. (2013). DocuScope for genre analysis: Potential for assessing pragmatic functions. In N. Taguchi & J. M. Sykes (Eds.), Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching (pp. 235–260). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue