Cover not available

In:Advances in Sign Language Corpus Linguistics
Edited by Ella Wehrmeyer
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 108] 2023
► pp. 155–191

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Verb classes in South African Sign Language

A corpus-driven approach

 | North-West University, South Africa
Published online: 3 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.108.06weh
Abstract
This chapter presents a pioneer exploration of verb categories in South African Sign Language (SASL), using a corpus of authentic naturalistic narrative data. The paucity of linguistic descriptions of SASL meant that a theoretical basis for the study was derived using models developed for other sign languages, in particular those of Padden (1986, 1988, 1990), Johnston (1991), and De Beuzeville et al. (2009). The study also sought to explore whether verb classes can be distinguished in terms of gaze, head turns, body turns, location shift, nature of movement, emotive facial expressions, and explicitation of arguments, and how these parameters change during role-shift. The study finds that De Beuzeville et al.’s (2009) categorization provides the closest description for SASL verbs, but with a split in their ‘directional verbs’ category into agreement and motion verbs. A typology for SASL verbs is proposed and reflected upon in terms of teaching objectives.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Padden’s verb typology
  • 3.Alternative verb typologies
  • 4.Other properties associated with verbs
  • 5.Method
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Plain verbs
    • 6.2Agreement verbs
    • 6.3Verbs of motion
    • 6.4Depicting verbs
  • 7.Discussion
  • 8.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (66)
References
Aarons, Debra & Akach, Philemon. 2002. South African Sign Language: One language or many? In Language in South Africa, Rajend Mesthrie (ed.), 127–147. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Akach, Philemon. 1997. The grammar of sign language. Language Matters 28: 7–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bahan, Benjamin, Kegl, Judy, Lee, Robert G., MacLaughlin, Dawn & Neidle, Carol. 2000. The licensing of null agreements in American Sign Language. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baker-Schenk, Charlotte & Cokely, Dennis. 1981. American Sign Language. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barberà, Gemma. 2014. Use and function of spatial planes in Catalan Sign Language (LSC) discourse. Sign Language Studies 14: 147–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cormier, Kearsy, Fenlon, Jordon & Schembri, Adam. 2015. Indicating verbs in BSL favour motivated use of space. Open Linguistics 10: 684–707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costello, Brendan. 2016. Language and Modality: Effects of the Use of Space in the Agreement System of Lengua de Signos Española (Spanish Sign Language). PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam and University of the Basque Country. <[URL]> (30 June 2022).
Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjies, Han. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction and Exploitation of Sign Language Corpora (LREC 2008), Onno Crasborn, Thomas Hanke, Eleni Efthimiou, Inge Zwitserlood & Ernst Thoutenhoofd (eds), 39–43. Paris: ELRA. <[URL]> (27 March 2022).
De Beuzeville, Louise, Johnston, Trevor & Schembri, Adam. 2009. The use of space with indicating verbs in Australian Sign Language: A corpus-based investigation. Sign Languages & Linguistics 12(1): 53–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emmorey, Karen. 1996. The confluence of space and language in signed languages. In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Mary Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill Garret (eds), 171–207. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engberg-Pedersen, Elisabeth. 1993. Space in Danish Sign Language. Hamburg: Signum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. From pointing to reference and predication: Pointing signs, eyegaze, and head and body orientation in Danish Sign Language. In Pointing: Where Language, Culture and Cognition Meet, Sotara Kito (ed.), 269–92. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fenlon, Jordon, Schembri, Adam & Cormier, Kearsy. 2018. Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language: A corpus-based study. Language 94(1): 84–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geraci, Carlo. 2012. Hands in space. On the grammatical use of space in sign languages. Paper presented at Sign Language Colloquium, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Goswell, Delia. 2011. Being there: Role shift in English to Auslan interpreting. In Signed Language Interpreting: Preparation, Practice and Performance, Lorraine Leeson, Svenja Wurm & Myriam Vermeerbergen (eds), 61–68. Manchester: St Jerome.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herrmann, Annika & Steinbach, Markus. 2012. Quotation in sign languages: A visible context shift. In Quotatives. Cross-Linguistic and Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, Isabelle Buchstaller & Ingrid van Alphen (eds), 203–230. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hou, Lynn & Meier, Richard P. 2018. The morphology of first-person object forms of directional verbs in ASL. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(1): 114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Kate. 2017. A preliminary look at negative constructions in South African Sign Language: Question-answer clauses. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 48(1): 93–104.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janzen, Terry. 2004. Space rotation, perspective shift, and verb morphology in ASL. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 149–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor. 1991. Spatial syntax and spatial semantics in the inflection of signs for the marking of person and location in Auslan. International Journal of Sign Linguistics 2(1): 29–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Auslan corpus annotation guidelines. <[URL]> (2 February 2022).
Kiingi, Kibuuka. 2013. A classification of language signs. Luganda Scientific (February). <[URL]> (8 June 2022).
Koulidobrova, Elena. 2017. Elide me bare: Null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 35: 397–446. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leeson, Lorraine, & John Saeed. 2012. Irish Sign Language: A Cognitive-Linguistic Account. Edinburgh: EUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott K. 1990. Four functions of a locus: Re-examining the structure of space in ASL. In Sign language research: Theoretical issues, Ceil Lucas (ed.), 176–98. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott. 2000. Indicating verbs and pronouns: Pointing away from agreement. In The Signs of Language Revisited: An Anthology to Honor Ursula Bellugi and Edward Klima, Karen Emmorey & Harlan L. Lane (eds), 303–320. New York NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Agreement disagreements. Theoretical Linguistics 37: 161–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liddell, Scott & Metzger, Melanie. 1998. Gesture in sign language discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 657–697. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane. 1986. Two kinds of null arguments in American Sign Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 415–444. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. Universal Grammar and American Sign Language: Setting the Null Parameters [Studies in Theoretical Psycholinguistics 13]. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Utterance reports and constructed action. In Sign Language: An International Handbook, Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds), 365–387. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillo-Martin, Diane & Meier, Richard P. 2011. On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages. Theoretical Linguistics 37(3–4): 95–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lutalo-Kiingi, Sam. 2014. A Descriptive Grammar of Morphosyntactic Constructions in Ugandan Sign Language (UgSL). PhD dissertation, University of Central Lancashire.
McBurney, Susan. 2002. Pronomial reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, Richard Meier, Kearsy Cormier & David Quinto-Pozos (eds), 329–369. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKee, Rachel, Schembri, Adam, McKee, David & Johnston, Trevor. 2011. Variable subject presence in Australian Sign Language and New Zealand Sign Language. Language Variation and Change 23: 375–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Richard P. 1990. Person deixis in ASL. In Theoretical Issues in Sign Language Research, Vol. 1: Linguistics, Susan Fisher & Patricia Siple (eds), 175–190. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. The acquisition of verb agreement: Pointing out arguments for the linguistic status of verb agreement in sign languages. In Directions in Sign Language Acquisition [Trends in Language Acquisition Research 2], Gary Morgan & Bencie Woll (eds), 115–141. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meir, Irit. 1998. Thematic Structure and Verb Agreement in Israeli Sign Language. PhD dissertation, Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Meir, Irit, Padden, Carol, Aronoff, Mark & Sandler, Wendy. 2007. Body as subject. Journal of Linguistics 43: 531–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metzger, Melanie. 1995. Constructed dialogue and constructed action in American Sign Language. In Sociolinguistics in Deaf Communities, Ceil Lucas (ed.), 255–271. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol, Kegl, Judy, McLaughlin, Dawn, Bahan, Ben & Lee, Robert. 2000. The Syntax of American Sign Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oomen, Marloes & Kimmelman, Vadim. 2019. Body anchored verbs and argument omission in sign languages. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4(1): 42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol. 1986. Verbs and role shifting in American Sign Language. In Proceedings of the Fourth National Symposium on Sign Language Research and Teaching, Carol Padden (ed.), 44–57. Silver Springs MD: National Association of the Deaf.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Interaction of Morphology and Syntax in American Sign Language. New York NY: Garland. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. The relation between space and grammar in ASL morphology. In Sign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, Ceil Lucas (ed.), 118–132. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padden, Carol, Meir, Irit, Sandler, Wendy & Aronoff, Mark. 2010. The grammar of space in two new sign languages. In Sign Languages [Cambridge Language Surveys], Diane Brentari (ed.), 570–592. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Penn, Claire. 1992. The sociolinguistics of South African Sign Language. In Language and Society in Africa: The Theory and Practice of Sociolinguistics, Robert Herbert (ed.), 277–284. Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perniss, Pamela. 2012. Use of sign space. In Sign Language: An International Handbook [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science], Roland Pfau, Markus Steinbach & Bencie Woll (eds), 412–431. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland & Quer, Joseph. 2010. Non-manuals: Their prosodic and grammatical roles. In Sign Languages [Cambridge Language Surveys], Diane Brentari (ed.), 381–402. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poizner, Howard, Klima, Edward, & Bellugi, Ursula. 1987. What the Hands Reveal about the Brain. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. 2011. Reporting and quoting in signed discourse. In Understanding Quotation, Elke Brendel, Jörg Meibauer & Markus Steinbach (eds), 277–302. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sandler, Wendy & Lillo-Martin, Diane. 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Supalla, Ted. 1982. Structure and Acquisition of Verbs of Motion and Location in American Sign Language. PhD dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
Sutton-Spence, Rachel & Woll, Bencie. 1999. The Linguistics of British Sign Language. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Robin, Emmorey, Karen & Kluender, Robert. 2006. The relationship between eye gaze and verb agreement in American Sign Language: An eye tracking study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 571–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Learning to look: The acquisition of eye gaze agreement during the production of ASL verbs. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12: 393–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wehrmeyer, Ella. 2015. An annotation system for signed language interpreting corpora. Hermeneus 17: 279–317.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019a. Linguistic interference in interpreting from English to South African Sign Language. In English in Multilingual South Africa: The Linguistics of Contact and Change, Raymond Hickey (ed.), 371–393. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulf, Alyssa, Dudis, Paul, Bayley, Robert & Lucas, Ceil. 2002. Variable subject presence in ASL narratives. Sign Language Studies 3(1): 54–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeshan, Ulrike. 2003. Indo-Pakistani Sign Language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies 3(2): 157–212. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipf, George. 1949. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Cambridge MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Wehrmeyer, Ella
2025. Structure of simple declarative clauses in South African Sign Language. Sign Language & Linguistics 28:1 ► pp. 104 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue