Cover not available

In:Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics: New approaches to variability and change
Edited by Susanne Flach and Martin Hilpert
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 105] 2022
► pp. 93–132

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

“I’m putting some salt in my sandwich”.

The use of the progressive in EFL textbook conversation

 | Osnabrück University
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.105.04lef
Abstract
Previous studies have claimed that the progressive is frequently over- and misrepresented in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) textbooks (e.g. Römer 2005). This paper compares the representation of progressives in the dialogues of nine series of secondary school EFL textbooks (43 volumes) to the Spoken BNC2014. The frequencies, morphosyntactic and functional aspects of progressive constructions, such as contraction, negation, framing and time reference, are investigated. Collostructional analysis is used to explore the lexical associations of the progressive. A number of idiosyncratic uses of the progressive in textbook conversation are highlighted and pedagogical implications discussed. In particular, key conversational discourse-structuring phrasemes in the progressive are found to be critically underrepresented.
Article outline
  • 1.Background and aims
    • 1.1Introduction
    • 1.2The progressive in EFL textbooks
      • 1.2.1Aims and research questions
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Corpus data
    • 2.2Data extraction and annotation
    • 2.3Calculating the frequency of progressives
    • 2.4Comparing frequencies
    • 2.5Collostructional analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Frequency of progressives
    • 3.2Morphosyntactic features
      • 3.2.1Tense, aspect and modality
      • 3.2.2Contractions
      • 3.2.3Negation
      • 3.2.4Questions
      • 3.2.5Voice
    • 3.3Functions of the progressive
      • 3.3.1Time reference
      • 3.3.2(Non-)Continuousness
      • 3.3.3Repeated actions and states
      • 3.3.4Additional functions of the progressives
    • 3.4Lexis
  • 4.Discussion and limitations
  • 5.Implications and conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
  • Appendix
References (58)
References
Andersen, Roger W. & Shirai, Yasuhiro. 1994. Discourse motivations for some cognitive acquisition principles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 16(2): 133–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, Kathleen. 2012. After process, then what? A longitudinal investigation of the progressive prototype in L2 English. In Tense, Aspect, and Mood in First and Second Language Acquisition [Cahiers Chronos 24], Emmanuelle Labeau & Inès Saddour (eds), 131–151. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belli, Serap Atasever. 2017. An analysis of stative verbs used with the progressive aspect in corpus-informed textbooks. English Language Teaching 11(1): 120–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman. Also published as Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 2021. Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi. 2002. What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2): 199–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus. 2012. Varieties of English in current English language teaching. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics 38: 27–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I. 2020. Aspect and aspectuality. In The Handbook of English Linguistics, Bas Aarts, April McMahon & Lars Hinrichs (eds), 183–205. Hoboken NJ: Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bland, Susan Kesner. 1988. The present progressive in discourse: Grammar versus usage revisited. TESOL Quarterly 22(1): 53–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 2000. Will corpus linguistics revolutionize grammar teaching in the 21st century? TESOL Quarterly 34(3): 548–560. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2020. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment – Companion Volume. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing. <[URL]> (1 September 2020).
Deshors, Sandra C. 2017. Zooming in on verbs in the progressive: A collostructional and correspondence analysis approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45(3): 260–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuchs, Robert & Gut, Ulrike. 2015. An apparent time study of the progressive in Nigerian English. In Grammatical Change in English World-Wide [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 67], Peter Collins (ed.), 373–387. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilmore, Alex. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 58(4): 363–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2018. American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes: Does context tip the scale(s)? In Modeling World Englishes: Assessing the Interplay of Emancipation and Globalization of ESLVvarieties [Varieties of English Around the World G61], Sandra C. Deshors (ed.), 187–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, Stefan Th. 2019a. Coll.analysis 3.5 package for R. <[URL]> (14 February 2019).
Gries, Stefan Th. & Stefanowitsch, Anatol. 2004. Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on “alternations.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1): 97–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hahn, Angela, Reich, Sabine & Schmied, Josef. 2000. Aspect in the Chemnitz Internet Grammar. In Papers from the Twentieth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 20), Freiburg im Breisgau 1999, Christian Mair & Marianne Hundt (eds), 131–139. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Honnibal, Matthew & Montani, Ines. 2017. spaCy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne. 2004. The passival and the progressive passive: A case study of layering in the English aspect and voice systems. In Corpus Approaches to Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 13], Hans Lindquist & Christian Mair (eds), 79–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, Marianne & Vogel, Katrin. 2011. Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes: Fact or fiction? In Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap [Sudies in Corpus Linguistics 44], Joybrato Mukherjee & Marianne Hundt (eds), 145–165. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kilgarriff, Adam, Baisa, Vít, Bušta, Jan, Jakubíček, Miloš, Kovář, Vojtěch, Michelfeit, Jan, Rychlý, Pavel & Suchomel, Vít. 2014. The Sketch Engine: Ten years on. Lexicography 1(1): 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. The relevance of Cognitive Grammar for language pedagogy. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: A Volume in Honour of René Dirven, Sabine De Knop, René Dirven & Teun De Rycker (eds), 7–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Le Foll, Elen. 2020. Issues in compiling and exploiting textbook corpora. Presented at the Japanese Association for English Corpus Studies 2020, Tokyo.
. 2022a. Textbook English: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Language of EFL textbooks used in Secondary Schools in France, Germany and Spain. Unpublished PhD thesis. Osnabrück University.
. 2022b. Making tea and mistakes: The functions of make in conversational English and textbook dialogues. In Multifunctionality in English: Corpora, Language and Academic Literacy Pedagogy. Zihan Yin & Elaine Vine (eds). Oxon; New York: Routledge. pp. 157–178.
Leech, Geoffrey, Rayson, Paul & Wilson, Andrew. 2001. Word Frequencies in Written and Spoken English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 2012. Progressive and continuous Aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert Binnick (ed.), 803–827. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian & Hundt, Marianne. 1995. Why is the progressive becoming more frequent in English? A corpus-based investigation of language change in progress. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 43: 111–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, Fanny. 2008. Corpora, cognition and pedagogical grammars: An account of convergences and divergences. In Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar: A Volume in Honour of René Dirven, Sabine De Knop, René Dirven & Teun De Rycker (eds), 91–117. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meunier, Fanny & Gouverneur, Céline. 2009. New types of corpora for new educational challenges: Collecting, annotating and exploiting a corpus of textbook material. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Karin Aijmer (ed.), 179–201. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meyer, David, Zeileis, Achim & Hornik, Kurt. 2020. vcd: Visualizing categorical data.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mindt, Dieter. 1987. Sprache, Grammatik, Unterrichtsgrammatik: Futurischer Zeitbezug im Englischen (Schule und Forschung). Frankfurt: Diesterweg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niemeier, Susanne. 2017. Task-based grammar teaching of English: Where cognitive grammar and task-based language teaching meet. Tübingen: Narr Francke Attempto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preisler, Bent. 2002. Functions and forms of English in a European EFL country. In Standard English: The Widening Debate, Tony Bex (ed.), 239–267. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula. 2014. Variation in the Progressive. A Corpus-based Study into World Englishes. PhD dissertation. <[URL]> (14 June 2019).
Rautionaho, Paula & Deshors, Sandra C. 2018. Progressive or not progressive? Modeling the constructional choices of EFL and ESL writers. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2): 225–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula, Deshors, Sandra & Meriläinen, Lea. 2018. Revisiting the ENL-ESL-EFL continuum: A multifactorial approach to grammatical aspect in spoken Englishes. ICAME Journal 42(1): 41–78. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rautionaho, Paula & Fuchs, Robert. 2020. Recent change in stative progressives: A collostructional investigation of British English in 1994 and 2014. English Language and Linguistics 25(1): 35–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rinker, Tyler W. 2018. textstem: Tools for Stemming and Lemmatizing Text in R. Buffalo NY. <[URL]> (1 February 2019).
. 2006. Looking at looking: Functions and contexts of progressives in spoken English and ‘school’ English. In The Changing Face of Corpus Linguistics. Papers from the 24th International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 24), Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 231–242. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Rooy, Bertus. 2006. The extension of the progressive aspect in Black South African English. World Englishes 25(1): 37–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, Nicholas. 2005. A Corpus-based Investigation of Recent Change in the Use of the Progressive in British English. PHD dissertation, Lancaster University. <[URL]> (1 March 2019).
Smith, Nicholas & Rayson, Paul. 2007. Recent change and variation in the British English use of the progressive passive. ICAME Journal 31: 129–160.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smitterberg, Erik. 2005. The progressive in 19th-century English: A process of integration [Language and Computers 54]. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, Anatol & Gries, Stefan Th. 2003. Collostructions: Investigating the interaction of words and constructions. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2): 209–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Syrbe, Mona & Rose, Heath. 2018. An evaluation of the global orientation of English textbooks in Germany. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 12(2): 152–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Timmis, Ivor. 2016. Humanising coursebook dialogues. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 10(2): 144–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 1997. The progressive in NS and NNS student compositions: Evidence from the International Corpus of Learner English. In Corpus-Based Studies in English: Papers From the Seventeenth International Conference on English Language Research on Computerized Corpora (ICAME 17). Stockholm, May 15–19, 1996, Magnus Ljung (ed.), 299–309. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wainryb, Ruth. 1996. “Death, Taxes and Jeopardy: Systematic Omissions in EFL Texts, or Life Was Never Meant to be an Adjacency Pair.” Paper presented at the 9th Educational Conference, Sydney, Australia.
Westergren Axelsson, Margareta & Hahn, Angela. 2001. The use of the progressive in Swedish and German advanced learner English: A corpus-based study. ICAME Journal 25: 5–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wulff, Stefanie & Römer, Ute. 2009. Becoming a proficient academic writer: Shifting lexical preferences in the use of the progressive. Corpora 4(2): 115–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2022. Reflections on applied cognitive corpus linguistics. Pedagogical Linguistics 3:2 ► pp. 193 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Textbook English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 116], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue