Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 259–290

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Nominalizations in Early Modern English

A cross-register perspective

 | University of Oviedo
Published online: 8 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.10rod
Abstract
This chapter explores word-based nominalizations in Early Modern English, a crucial period in the expansion of the English vocabulary. Nine Romance and native suffixes are traced in eighteen registers, thus covering a wide variety of registers along the formal-informal and speech-written continua. Findings demonstrate that there is a strong correlation between informal, speech-related registers and a low frequency of nominalizations, although the communicative purpose of particular registers can also have an effect here. Suffix productivity is also addressed, with results showing that, the frequency of nominalizations in terms of types and tokens increases over time across registers, except trial proceedings. However, Romance suffixes are seen chiefly responsible for this, whereas most native suffixes lose productivity during the period.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sources and methodology
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Overall distribution of nominalization across registers
    • 3.2Diachronic distribution of nominalizations across registers
    • 3.3Suffix productivity diachronically
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (90)
References
Anderson, Karen. 2000. Productivity in English Nominal and Adjectival Derivation, 1100–2000. PhD dissertation, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
ARCHER = A Representative Corpus of Historical English Registers. 1990–1993/2002/2007/2010/2013. Originally compiled under the supervision of Douglas Biber & Edward Finegan at Northern Arizona University and University of Southern California. Modified and expanded by subsequent members of a consortium of universities. Current member universities are Northern Arizona, Southern California, Freiburg, Heidelberg, Helsinki, Uppsala, Michigan, Manchester, Lancaster, Bamberg, Zurich, Trier, Salford, and Santiago de Compostela. <[URL]>
Aronoff, Mark. 1976. Word Formation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Dwight. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context. The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, Harald. 1989. A Corpus-Based Approach to Morphological Productivity. Statistical Analysis and Psycho-Linguistic Interpretation. PhD dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Quantitative aspects of morphological productivity. In Yearbook of Morphology 1991, Geert Booij & Jaap Van Marle (eds), 109–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data. A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds), 899–919. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, David. 2005. On the historical origins of nominalized process in scientific text. English for Specific Purposes 24: 347–357. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bator, Magdalena. 2006. Scandinavian loanwords in English in the 15th century. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia. An International Review of English Studies 42: 285–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 2001. Morphological Productivity. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beal, Joan C. 2004. English in Modern Times: 1700–1945. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, Vijay K. 1993. Analyzing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62: 384–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. Variation Across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Dimensions of variation among eighteenth-century speech-based and written registers. In Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds), 89–109. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Finegan, Edward. 1989. Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3): 487–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. The linguistic evolution of five written and speech-based genres from the seventeenth to the twentieth centuries. In History of Englishes: New Methods and Interpretations in Historical Linguistics, Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen & Irma Taavitsainen (eds), 688–704. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In To Explain the Present: Studies in the Changing English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, Terttu Nevalainen & Leena Kahlas-Tarkka (eds), 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Gray, Bethany. 2013. Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics 41: 104–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen C. 1987. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ciszek, Ewa. 2008. Word Derivation in Early Middle English. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia. 2012. Linguistic levels: Styles, registers, genres, text types. In English Historical Linguistics. An International Handbook, Vol. 1, Alexander Bergs & Laurel J. Brinton (eds), 237–253. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Claridge, Claudia & Wilson, Andrew. 2002. Style evolution in the English sermon. In Sounds, Words, Texts and Change. Selected Papers from 11 ICEHL, Santiago de Compostela, 7–11 September 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 224], Teresa Fanego, Belén Méndez-Naya & Elena Seoane (eds), 25–44. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowie, Claire. 1998. Diachronic Word-formation: A Corpus-Based Study of Derived Nominalizations in the History of English. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.
Cowie, Claire & Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2002. Diachronic word-formation and studying changes in productivity over time: Theoretical and methodological considerations. In A Changing World of Words. Studies in English Historical Lexicography, Lexicology and Semantics, Javier Díaz-Vera (ed.), 410–437. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crystal, David & Davy, Derek. 1969. Investigating English Style. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan & Kytö, Merja. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues. Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 1996. The French Influence on Middle English Morphology: A Corpus-based Study of Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dekeyser, Xavier. 1986. Romance loans in Middle English: A re-assessment. In Linguistics across Historical and Geographical Boundaries. In Honour of Jacek Fisiak on the Occasion of his Fiftieth Birthday, Vol. I: Linguistic Theory and Historical Linguistics, Dieter Kastovsky & Alexander Szwedek (eds), 253–265. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Diller, Hans-Jürgen. 2001. Genre in linguistic and related discourses. In Towards a History of English as a History of Genres, Hans-Jürgen Diller & Manfred Görlach (eds), 3–43. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Di Renzo Villata, Maria Gigliola. 2007. Legal English. Padova: Cedam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durkin, Philip. 2008. Latin loanwords of the early modern period: How often did French act as an intermediary? In English Historical Linguistics. Selected papers from the Fourteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL 14), Bergamo, 21-25 August 2006. Vol. II. Lexical and Semantic Change, Richard Drury, Maurizio Gotti and Marina Dossena (eds), 185–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fanego, Teresa, Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván. 2017. The Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR): A resource for analysing the development of English legal discourse. ICAME Journal 41: 53–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Anne-Christine. 2014. Derivation in Middle English: Regional and Text Type Variation. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Görlach, Manfred. 1999. English in Nineteenth-century England. An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Eighteenth-century English. Heidelberg: C. Winter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisƚaw. 2011. Patterns of Linguistic Variation in American Legal English. A Corpus-based Study. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, Bethany & Egbert, Jesse. 2019. Register and register variation. Register Studies 1(1): 1–9. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 2004 [1988]. The language of physical science. In The Language of Science [Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday Vol. 5], Jonathan J. Webster (ed.), 140–158. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Martin, James R. 1993. Writing Science. Literary and Discursive Power. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood & Matthiessen, Christian. 2004. An Introduction to Functional Grammar, 3rd edn. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist, New Series 68(4): 922–935. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. 2013. Constructional Change in English: Developments in Allomorphy, Word Formation and Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huber, Magnus. 2007. The Old Bailey Proceedings, 1764–1834. Evaluating and annotating a corpus of 18th- and 19th-century spoken English. In Annotating Variation and Change [Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English 1], Anneli Meurman-Solin & Arja Nurmi (eds). Helsinki: University of Helsinki. <[URL]> (27 May 2021).
Kaunisto, Mark. 2007. Variation and Change in the Lexicon: A Corpus-based Analysis of Adjectives in English Ending in -ic and -ical. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Santorini, Beatrice & Delfs, Lauren. 2004. Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Early Modern English.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kytö, Merja & Culpeper, Jonathan. 2006. A Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. <[URL]> (27 May 2021).
Kytö, Merja & Walker, Terry. 2006. Guide to a Corpus of English Dialogues 1560–1760. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, David Y. W. 2001. Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning and Technology 5(3): 37–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lloyd, Cynthia. 2011. Semantics and Word Formation. The Semantic Development of Five French Suffixes in Middle English. Bern: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matras, Yaron. 2009. Language Contact. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattiello, Elisa. 2010. Nominalization in English and Italian normative legal texts. ESP Across Cultures 7: 129–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, Carey. 1998. The Evolution of English Prose 1700–1900: Style, Politeness, and Print Culture. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moskowich-Spiegel Fandiño, Isabel. 1995. Language contact and language change: The Danes in England. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 8: 139–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, Greg. 1990. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Madison WI: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu. 1999. Early Modern English lexis and semantics. The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. III: 1476–1776, Roger Lass (ed.), 332–458. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevalainen, Terttu & Raumolin-Brunberg, Helena. 1994. Its strength and the beauty of it: The standardization of the third person neuter possessive in Early Modern English. In Towards a Standard English: Processes of Selection in Syntax and Morphology, Dieter Stein & Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade (eds), 171–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Historical Sociolinguistics. Language Change in Tudor and Stuart England. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Helsinki Corpus. Period division: Early Modern English. <[URL]> (16 February 2019).
Nevalainen, Terttu & Tieken-Boon van Ostade, Ingrid. 2006. Standardisation. In A History of the English Language, Richard Hogg & David Denison (eds), 271–311. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary, online edn. <[URL]> (27 May 2021).
Palmer, Chris C. 2009. Borrowings, Derivational Morphology, and Perceived Productivity in English, 1300–1600. PhD dissertation, The University of Michigan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Measuring productivity diachronically: Nominal suffixes in English letters, 1400–1600. English Language and Linguistics 19(1): 107–129. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo. 1999. Morphological Productivity: Structural Constraints in English Derivation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. Word-formation in English. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Dalton-Puffer, Christiane & Baayen, Harald. 1999. Morphological productivity across speech and writing. English Language and Linguistics 3(2): 209–228. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2020. R version 3.6.3. A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (27 May 2021).
Riddle, Elizabeth M. 1985. A historical perspective on the productivity of the suffixes -ness and -ity. In Historical Semantics, Historical Word-Formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 435–461. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula. 2019. Interpersonality in legal written discourse. A diachronic analysis of personal pronouns in law reports, 1535 to present. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 91], Teresa Fanego & Paula Rodríguez-Puente (eds), 171–199. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Register variation in word-formation processes: The development of -ity and -ness in Early Modern English. International Journal of English Studies 20(2) 147–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Puente, Paula, Fanego, Teresa, López-Couso, María José, Méndez-Naya, Belén, Núñez-Pertejo, Paloma, Blanco-García, Cristina & Tamaredo, Iván. 2018. Corpus of Historical English Law Reports 1535–1999 (CHELAR), v.2. <[URL]> (27 May 2021).
Romaine, Suzanne. 1998. Introduction. In The Cambridge History of the English Language, Vol. IV: 1776–1997, Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 1–56. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romero-Barranco, Jesús. 2020. A comparison of some French and English nominal suffixes in early English correspondence. In Multilingual Origins of Standard English, Laura Wright (ed.), 467–486. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rothwell, William. 1996. The Anglo-French element in the vulgar register of Late Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 5: 423–436.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja. 2014. Sociolinguistic Variation in English Derivational Productivity. Studies and Methods in Diachronic Corpus Linguistics. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Säily, Tanja & Suomela, Jukka. 2009. Comparing type counts: The case of women, men and -ity in early English letters. In Corpus Linguistics: Refinements and Reassessments, Antoinette Renouf & Andrew Kehoe (eds), 87–109. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sánchez-Febrero, José Luis. 2003. Legal English and Translation: Theory and Practice. Annotated Texts and Documents. Alicante: Editorial Club Universitario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Edgar W.. 1985. Variability in word formation patterns and productivity in the history of English. In Papers from the 6th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 34], Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 451–465. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Mike. 2012. WordSmith Tools, Version 6. Stroud: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suomela, Jukka. 2016. Types2: Type and Hapax Accumulation Curves [Computer program]. <[URL]> (27 May 2021)
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2016. Genre dynamics in the history of English. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö and Päivi Pahta (eds), 271–285. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiersma, Peter M. 1999. Legal Language. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trips, Carola. 2009. Lexical Semantics and Diachronic Morphology: The Development of -hood, -doom and -ship in the History of English. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tyrkkö, Jukka & Hiltunen, Turo. 2009. Frequency of nominalization in Early Modern English medical writing. In Corpora: Pragmatics and Discourse, Andreas Jucker, Daniel Schreier & Marianne Hundt (eds), 297–320. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ventola, Eija. 1996. Packing and unpacking of information in academic texts. In Academic Writing. Intercultural and Textual Issues, Eija Ventola & Anna Mauranen (eds), 153–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, Christopher. 2004. Legal English and plain language: An introduction. ESP Across Cultures 1: 111–124.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue