Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 235–258

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
On the importance of register in learner writing

A multi-dimensional approach

 | Uppsala University
 | University of Louvain
 | Northern Arizona University
Published online: 8 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.09lar
Abstract
The present study explores the relative importance of register in learner writing vis-à-vis learner-internal factors such as first-language background. Using multi-dimensional analysis, the study looks at learner and native-speaker student writing from two registers (argumentative essays and research papers), in comparison to published scientific articles. The results show that while certain differences could be noted across first-language background, the main differences were found between the registers, stressing its importance as a moderating variable. Specifically, the research papers and the scientific articles were characterized by topic-focussed, factual descriptions, and the argumentative texts by a more personal style. The results thus highlight the importance of taking register into consideration in learner corpus research studies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Register variation in learner corpus research
  • 3.Data and method
    • 3.1Corpora
    • 3.2Method
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1The dimensions
    • 4.2The effect of L1 background, NS status, and register
      • 4.2.1Dimension 1: Personal vs. topic-focussed style
      • 4.2.2Dimension 2: Evaluative style vs. factual descriptions
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (50)
References
Ädel, Annelie. 2006. Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 24]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. Modality in advanced Swedish learners’ written interlanguage. In Computer Learner Corpora, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching [Language Learning & Language Teaching 6], Sylviane Granger, Joseph Hung & Stephanie Petch-Tyson (eds), 55–76. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt & Tapper, Marie. 1998. The use of adverbial connectors in advanced Swedish learners’ written English. In Learner English on Computer, Sylviane Granger (ed), 80–93. London: Addison-Wesley Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, Tony. 2014. 25 years later: Comparing Internet and pre-Internet registers. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-Linguistic Comparison. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. University Language: A Corpus-Based Study of Spoken and Written Registers [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 23]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Gray, Bethany & Staples, Shelley. 2016. Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics 37(5): 639–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Reppen, Randi, Staples, Shelley & Egbert, Jesse. 2020. Exploring the longitudinal development of grammatical complexity in the disciplinary writing of L2-English university students. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 6(1): 38–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, Susan. 1996. Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology. Linguistics and Education 8: 299–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, Amy & Bikowski, Dawn. 2007. Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(3): 206–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crossley, Scott A., Allen, Laura K. & McNamara, Danielle S. 2014. A multi-dimensional analysis of essay writing: What linguistic features tell us about situational parameters and the effects of language functions on judgments of quality. In Multi-Dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 60], Tony Berber Sardinha & Marcia Veirano Pinto (eds), 197–238. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crosthwaite, Peter, Cheung, Lisa & Jiang, Feng (Kevin). 2017. Writing with attitude: Stance expression in learner and professional dentistry research reports. English for Specific Purposes 46: 107–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Do all roads lead to Rome? Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(2): 233–273. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, Jesse, Larsson, Tove & Biber, Douglas. 2020. Doing Linguistics with a Corpus: Methodological Considerations for the Everyday Use. [Cambridge Elements in Corpus Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, Lynne. 2015. Learner corpora and language for academic and specific purposes. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 465–484. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, Sheena, Nesi, Hilary & Biber, Douglas. 2018. Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics 40(4): 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle. 2015. From design to collection of learner corpora. In The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research, Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 9–34. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Granger, Sylviane & Paquot, Magali. 2007. Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 6(4): 319–335. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle & Paquot, Magali. 2008. Too chatty: Learner academic writing and register variation. English Text Construction 1(1): 41–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane. 1996. From CA to CIA and back: An integrated contrastive approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora. In Languages in Contrast. Text-based cross-linguistic studies, Karin Aijmer, Bengt Altenberg & Mats Johansson (eds), 37–51. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 1(1): 7–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane, Dagneaux, Estelle, Meunier, Fanny & Paquot, Magali. 2009. The International Corpus of Learner English, Version 2. Handbook and CD-Rom. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, Sylviane & Paquot, Magali (eds). 2012. Electronic Lexicography. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, Jack A. & Römer, Ute. 2013. Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 8(2): 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgård, Hilde. 2009. Thematic choice and expressions of stance in English argumentative texts by Norwegian learners. In Corpora and Language Teaching [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 33], Karin Aijmer (ed.), 121–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Stating the obvious: Signals of shared knowledge in Norwegian-produced academic English. In Language, Learners and Levels: Progression and Variation, Pieter de Haan, Rina de Vries & Sanne van Vuuren (eds), 23–44. Louvain: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heuboeck, Alois, Holmes, Jasper & Nesi, Hilary. 2008. The BAWE Corpus Manual. <[URL]> (26 May 2021).
Larsson, Tove & Kaatari, Henrik. 2019. Extraposition in learner and expert writing. Exploring (in)formality and the impact of register. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5(1): 33–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Syntactic complexity across registers: Investigating (in)formality in second-langauge writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lu, Xiaofei. 2011. A corpus-based evaluation of syntactic complexity measures as indices of college-level ESL writers’ language development. TESOL Quarterly 45: 36–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narita, Masumi & Sugiura, Masatoshi. 2006. The use of adverbial connectors in argumentative essays by Japanese EFL college students. English Corpus Studies 13: 23–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neff, JoAnne, Ballesteros, Francisco, Dafouz, Emma, Martínez, Francisco, Rica, Juan-Pedro, Díez, Mercedes & Prieto, Rosa. 2007. A contrastive functional analysis of errors in Spanish EFL university writers’ argumentative texts: corpus-based study. In Corpus Linguistics Beyond the Word: Corpus Research from Phrase to Discourse [Language and Computers 60], Eileen Fitzpatrick (ed.), 203–225. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Nesi, Hilary & Gardner, Sheena. 2012. Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali. 2010. Academic Vocabulary in Learner Writing. From Extraction to Analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali & Biber, Douglas. 2015. The impact of genre on EFL learner writing: A MDA perspective. Conference paper given at ICAME 36, 28 May, Trier, Germany.
Paquot, Magali, Hasselgård, Hilde & Oksefjell Ebeling, Signe. 2013. Writer/reader visibility in learner writing across genres: A comparison of the French and Norwegian components of the ICLE and VESPA learner corpora. In Twenty Years of Learner Corpus Research. Looking Back, Moving Ahead. Proceedings of the First Learner Corpus Research Conference (LCR 2011), Sylviane Granger, Gaëtanelle Gilquin & Fanny Meunier (eds), 377–387. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses Universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paquot, Magali & Plonsky, Luke. 2017. Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3(1): 61–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez-Paredes, Pascual & Sánchez-Torneland, María. 2015. A multidimensional analysis of learner language during story reconstruction in interviews. In Learner Corpora in Language Testing and Assessment [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 70], Marcus Callies & Sandra Götz (eds), 141–162. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petch-Tyson, Stephanie. 1998. Reader/writer visibility in EFL persuasive writing. In Learner English on Computer, Sylviane Granger (ed.), 107–118. London: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Qin, Wenjuan & Uccelli, Paola. 2016. Same language, different functions: A cross-genre analysis of Chinese EFL learners’ writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing 33: 3–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Römer, Ute & O’Donnell, Matthew B. 2011. From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora 6(2): 159–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, Selley & Reppen, Randi. 2016. Understanding first-year L2 writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis across L1s, genres, and language ratings. Journal of Second Language Writing 32: 17–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, Shelley, Biber, Douglas & Reppen, Randi. 2018. Using corpus-based register analysis to explore the authenticity of high-stakes language exams: A register comparison of TOEFL iBTand disciplinary writing tasks. The Modern Language Journal 102(2): 310–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Way, Denise P., Joiner, Elizabeth G. & Seaman, Michael A. 2000. Writing in the secondary foreign language classroom: The effects of prompts and tasks on novice learners of French. The Modern Language Journal 84: 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Sue. 2012. Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data description task: Findings from a discipline-specific learner corpus. English for Specific Purposes 31(4): 261–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yoon, Hyung-Jo & Polio, Charlene. 2016. The linguistic development of students of English as a second language in two written genres. TESOL Quarterly 51(2): 275–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Goulart, Larissa & Tülay Dixon
2025. The relative influence of language backgrounds, communicative text types, and disciplines in undergraduate student writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 11:1 ► pp. 178 ff. DOI logo
Kaatari, Henrik, Ying Wang & Tove Larsson
2024. Introducing the Swedish Learner English Corpus: a corpus that enables investigations of the impact of extramural activities on L2 writing. Corpora 19:1 ► pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali
2024. Learner corpus research: a critical appraisal and roadmap for contributing (more) to SLA research agendas. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:3 ► pp. 567 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali, Alexander König, Egon W. Stemle & Jennifer-Carmen Frey
2024. The Core Metadata Schema for Learner Corpora (LC-meta). International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 280 ff. DOI logo
Özkan Miller, Vildan & Tove Larsson
2024. The effect of linguistic and extralinguistic features on EFL adverb placement. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 338 ff. DOI logo
Paquot, Magali & Nicole Tracy‐Ventura
2023. Using Foreign and Second Language Learner Corpora. In Current Approaches in Second Language Acquisition Research, ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo
Pyykönen, Maria
2023. Exploring patterns of lexical variation in the use of epistemic stance markers in written L2 English across task types and levels of proficiency. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 9:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Yujiao
2023. A Multidimensional Analysis of Language Use in English Argumentative Essays: An Evidence From Comparable Corpora. Sage Open 13:3 DOI logo
Paquot, Magali, Tove Larsson, Hilde Hasselgård, Signe O. Ebeling, Damien De Meyere, Larry Valentin, Natalia J. Laso, Isabel Verdaguer & Sanne van Vuuren
2022. The Varieties of English for Specific Purposes dAtabase (VESPA): Towards a multi-L1 and multi-register learner corpus of disciplinary writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Schaeffer-Lacroix, Eva
2022. "Es ist vieles getan, es bleibt vieles zu tun." – Production assistée par corpus d'un discours de fin d'année en cursus LEA allemand. Alsic Vol. 25, n° 2 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Variation in University Student Writing [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 117], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue