Cover not available

In:Corpus-based Approaches to Register Variation
Edited by Elena Seoane and Douglas Biber
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 103] 2021
► pp. 51–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
How register-specific is probabilistic grammatical knowledge?

A programmatic sketch and a case study on the dative alternation with give

 | KU Leuven
 | University of Birmingham
 | Vrije Universiteit Brussel | KU Leuven
 | KU Leuven
 | KU Leuven
Published online: 8 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.03eng
Abstract
While there is preliminary evidence about the importance of register in linguistic choice-making processes, systematic studies focusing on the interaction between register and language-internal constraints are lacking in variationist linguistics. This contribution sketches an ongoing project in which two well-understood grammatical alternations (dative alternation and future marker alternation) are analysed with variationist methods, focusing on the role of register defined at the intersection of mode (spoken vs written) and formality (formal vs informal). Probabilistic corpus models will be complemented with rating experiments to investigate to what extent they correlate with participants’ ratings, and to illustrate the importance of methodological diversity in investigating usage-based theories of grammar. We present corpus results of a case study on the dative alternation with give.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Register in variationist linguistics
  • 3.A programmatic sketch
    • 3.1Research questions
    • 3.2Methodology
      • 3.2.1Corpus data
      • 3.2.2Experimental track
  • 4.Case study: The dative alternation in English
    • 4.1Variable context
    • 4.2Language-internal constraints
      • 4.2.1Constituent length
      • 4.2.2Pronominality
      • 4.2.3Complexity
      • 4.2.4Frequency
      • 4.2.5Definiteness
      • 4.2.6Animacy
      • 4.2.7Verb sense
    • 4.3Analysis
    • 4.4Results
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (74)
References
Arppe, Antti, Gilquin, Gaëtanelle, Glynn, Dylan, Hilpert, Martin & Zeschel, Arne. 2010. Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora 5(1): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Balota, David A. & Chumbley, James I. 1984. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 10(3): 340–357.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas M., Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1): 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Behaghel, Otto. 1909. Beziehungen zwischen Umfang und Reihenfolge von Satzgliedern (Relationships between size and ordering of constituents). Indogermanische Forschungen 25: 110–142.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Belsley, David A., Kuh, Edwin & Welsch, Roy E. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York NY: John Wiley. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 8(1): 9–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Conrad, Susan. 2019. Register, Genre, and Style, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas & Egbert, Jesse. 2018. Register Variation Online. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Egbert, Jesse, Gray, Bethany, Oppliger, Rahel & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2016. Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, Merja Kytö & Päivi Pahta (eds), 351–375. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Branigan, Holly P., Pickering, Martin J. & Tanaka, Mikihiro. 2008. Contributions of animacy to grammatical function assignment and word order during production. Lingua 118(2): 172–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan, Cueni, Anna, Nikitina, Tatiana & Baayen, R. Harald. 2007. Predicting the dative alternation. In Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation, Gerlof Bouma, Irene Krämer & Joost Zwarts (eds), 69–94. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Ford, Marilyn. 2010. Predicting syntax: Processing dative constructions in American and Australian varieties of English. Language 86(1): 168–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Hay, Jennifer. 2008. Gradient grammar: An effect of animacy on the syntax of give in New Zealand and American English. Lingua 118(2): 245–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bušta, Jan, Herman, Ondřej, Jakubíček, Miloš, Krek, Simon & Novak, Blaž. 2017. JSI Newsfeed Corpus. Paper presented at the 9th International Corpus Linguistics Conference, University of Birmingham.
Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–733. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 25–56. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Arcy, Alexandra & Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2015. Not always variable: Probing the vernacular grammar. Language Variation and Change 27(3): 255–285. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2013. Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries (GloWbE). <[URL]> (25 May 2021).
. 2018. The 14 Billion Word iWeb Corpus. <[URL]> (25 May 2021).
Ehmer, Oliver & Rosemeyer, Malte. 2018. When “questions” are not questions. Inferences and conventionalization in Spanish but-prefaced partial interrogatives. Open Linguistics 4: 70–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Marilyn & Bresnan, Joan. 2013. Using convergent evidence from psycholinguistics and usage. In Research Methods in Language Variation and Change, Manfred Krug & Julia Schlüter (eds), 295–312. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garretson, Gregory, O’Connor, Catherine, Skarabela, Barbora & Hogan, Marjorie. 2004. Coding practices used in the Project Optimality Typology of Determiner Phrases. Ms, Boston University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geleyn, Tim. 2017. Syntactic variation and diachrony: The case of the Dutch dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13(1): 65–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerwin, Johanna. 2014. Ditransitives in British English Dialects [Topics in English Linguistics 50.3]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, Jason. 2014. Variation in English genitives across modality and genres. English Language and Linguistics 18(3): 471–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grafmiller, Jason & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world. A case study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30(3): 385–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. The most under-used statistical method in corpus linguistics: Multi-level (and mixed-effects) models. Corpora 10(1): 95–125. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grondelaers, Stefan, Speelman, Dirk & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2008. National variation in the use of er “there”. Regional and diachronic constraints on cognitive explanations. In Cognitive Sociolinguistics [Cognitive Linguistics Research 39], Gitte Kristiansen & René Dirven (eds), 153–204. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gundel, Jeanette K., Hedberg, Nancy & Zacharski, Ron. 1993. Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language 69(2): 274–307. [URL]
Guy, Gregory R. 2005. Letters to Language. Language 81(3): 561–563. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2015. Coherence, constraints and quantities. Paper presented at New Ways of Analyzing Variation (NWAV) 44, University of Toronto.
Hawkins, John A. 1995. A Performance Theory of Order and Constituency. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, John R. & Flower, Linda S. 1980. Identifying the organisation of writing processes. In Cognitive Processes in Writing, Lee W. Gregg & Erwin Steinberg (eds), 3–30. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heller, Benedikt, Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Grafmiller, Jason. 2017. Stability and fluidity in syntactic variation world-wide: The genitive alternation across varieties of English. Journal of English Linguistics 45(1): 3–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jankowski, Bridget L. 2013. A Variationist Approach to Cross-Register Language Variation and Change. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Klavan, Jane & Divjak, Dagmar. 2016. The cognitive plausibility of statistical classification models: Comparing textual and behavioral evidence. Folia Linguistica 50(2), 355–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf. 2012. Language of immediacy – Language of distance: Orality and literacy from the perspective of language theory and linguistic history. In Communicative spaces: Variation, contact, and change, Claudia Lange, Beatrix Weber & Göran Wolf (eds), 441–473. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1984. Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In Language in Use: Readings in Sociolinguistics, John Baugh & Joel Scherzer (eds), 28–53. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 3: Cognitive and Cultural Factors [Language in Society 39]. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
MacDonald, Maryellen C. 2013. How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, Maarten & Schuth, Anne. 2010. DutchParl: The parliamentary documents in Dutch. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odijk, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner & Daniel Tapias (eds), 3670–3677. Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). <[URL]> (25 May 2021).
Nakagawa, Shinichi & Schielzeth, Holger. 2012. A general and simple method for obtaining R² from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4(2): 133–142. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pijpops, Dirk & Van de Velde, Freek. 2018. A multivariate analysis of the partitive genitive in Dutch. Bringing quantitative data into a theoretical discussion. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14(1): 99–131. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. <[URL]> (25 May 2021).
Rayner, Keith & Duffy, Susan A. 1986. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition 14(3): 191–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rickford, John R. 2014. Situation: Stylistic variation in sociolinguistic corpora and theory. Language and Linguistics Compass 8(11): 590–603. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie. 2018a. Regional Variation in Probabilistic Grammars: A Multifactorial Study of the English Dative Alternation. PhD dissertation, KU Leuven.
. 2018b. Guidelines for the Dative Alternation. Ms.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Röthlisberger, Melanie, Grafmiller, Jason & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2017. Cognitive indigenization effects in the English dative alternation. Cognitive Linguistics 28(4): 673–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schönefeld, Doris. 2011. Introduction: On evidence and the convergence of evidence in linguistic research. In Converging Evidence: Methodological and Theoretical Issues for Linguistic Research, Doris Schönefeld (ed.), 1–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shih, Stephanie & Grafmiller, Jason. 2011. Weighing in on end weight. Paper presented at the LSA 85th Annual Meeting, 6–9 January 2011, Pittsburgh PA.
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2017. Variationist sociolinguistics and corpus-based variationist linguistics: Overlap and cross-pollination potential. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 62(4): 685–701. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Register in variationist linguistics. Register Studies 1(1): 76–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Grafmiller, Jason, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Annette, Tagliamonte, Sali & Todd, Simon. 2017. Spoken syntax in a comparative perspective: The dative and genitive alternation in varieties of English. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2(1): 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. 2013. Comparative sociolinguistics. In Handbook of Language Variation and Change, 2nd edn, Jack K. Chambers & Natalie Schilling (eds), 130–156. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. So sick or so cool? The language of youth on the internet. Language in Society 45(1): 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. & D’Arcy, Alexandra. 2009. Peaks beyond phonology: Adolescence, incrementation, and language change. Language 85(1): 58–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theijssen, Daphne, ten Bosch, Louis, Boves, Lou, Cranen, Bert & van Halteren, Hans. 2013. Choosing alternatives: Using Bayesian networks and memory-based learning to study the dative alternation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9(2): 227–262. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wasow, Thomas & Jennifer E. Arnold. 2003. Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In Günter Rohdenburg & Britta Mondorf (eds). Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, 119–154. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolk, Christoph, Bresnan, Joan, Rosenbach, Anette & Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt. 2013. Dative and genitive variability in Late Modern English: Exploring cross-constructional variation and change. Diachronica 30(3): 382–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wurm, Lee H. & Fisicaro, Sebastiano A. 2014. What residualizing predictors in regression analyses does (and what it does not do). Journal of Memory and Language 72: 37–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
York, Richard. 2012. Residualization is not the answer: Rethinking how to address multicollinearity. Social Science Research 6(41): 1379–1386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaenen, Annie, Carletta, Jean, Garretson, Gregory, Bresnan, Joan, Koontz-Garboden, Andrew, Nikitina, Tatiana, O’Connor, Catherine & Wasow, Tom. 2004. Animacy encoding in English: Why and how. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACL Workshop on Discourse Annotation, Barcelona, July 2004, Bonnie Webber & Donna Byron (eds), 118–125. East Stroudsburg PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva. 2019. Competition in Language Change: The Rise of the English Dative Alternation [Topics in English Linguistics 103]. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuur, Alain F., Ieno, Elena N., Walker, Neil, Saveliev, Anatoly A. & Smith, Graham M. 2009. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York NY: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Leclercq, Benoît, Cameron Morin & Dirk Pijpops
2025. The principle of no equivalence: an agent-based model. Cognitive Linguistics 36:4 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo
Egbert, Jesse, Douglas Biber, Daniel Keller & Marianna Gracheva
2024. Register and the dual nature of functional correspondence: accounting for text-linguistic variation between registers, within registers, and without registers. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:3 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt & Alexandra Engel
2023. A variationist perspective on the comparative complexity of four registers at the intersection of mode and formality. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:1 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Brysbaert, Jorina & Karen Lahousse
2022. Marking Contrastive Topics in a Topic Shift Context: Contrastive Adverbs versus Emphatic Pronouns. Discours :31 DOI logo
Brysbaert, Jorina & Karen Lahousse
2025. Syntactic position of contrast markers in different registers of French. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 30:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Engel, Alexandra & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2022. Variable grammars are variable across registers: future temporal reference in English. Language Variation and Change 34:3 ► pp. 355 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue