Cover not available

In:Beyond Concordance Lines: Corpora in language education
Edited by Pascual Pérez-Paredes and Geraldine Mark
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 102] 2021
► pp. 75–96

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
L2 development of -ing clauses

A longitudinal study of Norwegian learners

ORCiD logo with link | University of Oslo
Published online: 22 December 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.102.04dir
Abstract
Although -ing clauses are frequent in English, their acquisition has not received much attention, and there is a lack of longitudinal studies and detailed explorations of cross-linguistic influence. This longitudinal case study of five young Norwegian students reveals a developmental sequence for the syntactic roles of -ing clauses: complements of aspectual verbs > complements of other verbs and prepositions > bare adjuncts and postmodifiers of nouns > subjects. The sequence may arise from a combination of frequencies in the input and grammatical selection. Syntactic restrictions on Norwegian present participle clauses are not mirrored in the acquisition of -ing clauses, indicating that the students do not make an interlingual identification. Cross-linguistic influence is evident mainly in late acquisition and infrequent use of -ing clauses.
Article outline
  • Introduction
    • -ing clauses
  • Second language acquisition and use of -ing clauses
  • English -ing clauses and Norwegian present participle clauses compared
  • Research questions
  • Material and method
  • Findings
    • Developmental stages
    • Individual differences
    • Cross-linguistic influence
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (27)
References
Behrens, B., Fabricius-Hansen, C., & Solfjeld, K. (2012). Competing structures: The discourse perspective. In C. Fabricius-Hansen & D. Haug (Eds.), Big events, small clauses: The grammar of elaboration (pp. 179–225). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (1998). Comparing native and learner perspectives on English grammar: A study of complement clauses. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 145–158). Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dirdal, H., Drange, E.-M. D., Graedler, A.-L., Guldal, T. M., Hasund, I. K., Nacey, S. L., & Rørvik, S. (2017, October 4–7). Tracking Written Learner Language (TRAWL): A longitudinal corpus of Norwegian pupils’ written texts in second/foreign languages [Poster presentation]. 4th Learner Corpus Research Conference, Eurac Research, Bolzano, Italy. [URL]
Drew, I. (2010). A longitudinal study of young language learners’ development in written English. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 28(2), 193–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durrant, P., & Brenchley, M. (2018). Growth in grammar corpus. Available from [URL]
Ellis, N. C. (2007). The associative-cognitive CREED. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 77–95). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faarlund, J. T., Lie, S., & Vannebo, K. I. (1997). Norsk referansegrammatikk. Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Granger, S. (1997). On identifying the syntactic and discourse features of participle clauses in academic English: Native and non-native writers compared. In J. Aarts, I. de Mönnink, & H. Wekker (Eds.), Studies in English language and teaching: In honor of Flor Aarts (pp. 185–198). Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgård, H. (2012). Possessive absolutes in English and Norwegian. In C. Fabricius-Hansen & D. Haug (Eds.), Big events, small clauses: The grammar of elaboration (pp. 229–258). De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heggestad, L. (1931). Norsk grammatikk: Større utgåve (2nd ed.). Norli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, R. (2002). Non-finite and verbless clauses. In R. Huddleston & G. K. Pullum (Eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language (pp. 1171–1271). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2007). Crosslinguistic influence in language and cognition. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kinn, T. (2014). Verbalt presens partisipp. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift, 32(1), 62–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kortmann, B. (1991). Free adjuncts and absolutes in English: Problems of control and interpretation. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, S.-A. (2007). Ing forms and the progressive puzzle: A construction-based approach to English progressives. Journal of Linguistics, 43(1), 153–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lødrup, H. (2016). Verbal present participles in Norwegian: Controlled complements or parts of complex predicates. In D. Arnold, M. Butt, B. Crysmann, T. H. King, & S. Müller (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint 2016 Conference of Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and Lexical Functional Grammar, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland (pp. 380–400). CSLI.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog, where are you? Dial Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Næs, O. (1952). Norsk grammatikk. 1. Ordlære: Bokmål og nynorsk på bakgrunn av språkhistorie og dialekter. Fabritius.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raaen, G. F., & Guldal, T. M. (2012). Basic skills: Orthography and sentence complexity in written English from grades 7 to 10. In A. Hasselgren, I. Drew, & B. Sørheim (Eds.), The young language learner: Research-based insights into teaching and learning (pp. 101–117). Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tizón-Couto, B. (2014). Clausal complements in native and learner spoken English: A corpus-based study with Lindsei and Vicolse. Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tjerandsen, E. (1995). ‘Stories you may think is boring, can she make funny’: Sentence complexity in the written work of Norwegian 8th graders (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Bergen.
Wold, S. H. G. (2017). INGlish English: The progressive construction in learner narratives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Bergen. Bergen Open Research Archive.
Wulff, S., & Ellis, N. C. (2018). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In D. Miller, F. Bayram, J. Rothman, & L. Serratrice (Eds.), Bilingual cognition and language: The state of the science across its subfields (pp. 37–56). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Lababa
2024. From Challenge to Resource: Understanding Cross-Linguistic Influence in SLA. Lingua : Journal of Linguistics and Language 2:2 ► pp. 88 ff. DOI logo
Dirdal, Hildegunn
2022. Development of L2 writing complexity. In Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Learner Corpus Research [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 104], ► pp. 81 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue