Cover not available

In:Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 39–66

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Diachronic change in the ordering of kinship binomials

A contrastive perspective

 | Charles University, Prague
Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.101.03cer
Abstract
One of the specific characteristics of binomials is the ordering of their elements and the degree of their reversibility. A diachronic perspective suggests it is particularly the kinship binomials that show a strong unfreezing trend away from the male-first ordering. This study explores, diachronically and from an English-Czech contrastive perspective, kinship binomials in children’s literature. It confirms earlier findings of a gradual diachronic reversal of term ordering in kinship binomials that extends across languages. However, at the same time, binomial sequencing seems to be a complex interplay of linguistic, cognitive and real-world influences. The diachronic reversal of preference in the ordering is limited to particular binomials and may be linked to a more general change in the discourse, namely the shift towards greater informality.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On binomials and kinship terms
  • 3.Data and method
  • 4.Diachronic development of English kinship terms
    • 4.1Kinship binomials in the 19th century children’s literature
    • 4.2Kinship terms in contemporary children’s books
  • 5.Diachronic development of Czech kinship terms
  • 6.Extended cross-linguistic perspective
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowldegements
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Abrahams, Richard D. 1950. Fixed order of coordinates: A study in comparative lexicography. The Modern Language Journal 34(4): 276–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah Bunin & Levy, Roger. 2006. The chicken or the egg? A probabilistic analysis of English binomials. Language 82(2): 233–277. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čermák, František. 2010. Binomials: Their nature in Czech and in general. In Phraseologie global – areal – regional. Akten der Konferenz EUROPHRAS 2008, Jarmo Korhonen, Wolfgang Mieder, Elisabeth Piirainen & Rosa Piñel (eds), 309–315. Tübingen: Narr. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Čermáková, Anna. 2017.  The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog post]. <[URL]> (1 October 2019).
. 2018. ChiLit: The GLARE 19th Century Children’s Literature Corpus in CLiC [Blog post]. [URL] (1 October 2019).
Čermáková, Anna & Chlumská, Lucie. 2017. Expressing place in children’s literature. Testing the limits of the n-gram method in contrastive linguistics. In Cross-linguistic Correspondences. From Lexis to Genre [Studies in Language Companion Series 191], Thomas Egan & Hildegunn Dirdal (eds), 75–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chaloupka, Otakar & Voráček, Jaroslav. 1979. Kontury české literatury pro děti a mláděž. Praha: Albatros. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, William E. & Ross, John Robert. 1975. World order. In Functionalism, Robin E. Grossman, L. James San & Timothy J. Vance (eds), 63–111. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Craig, Lyn. 2016. Contemporary Motherhood: The Impact of Children on Adult Time. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2003. Typology and Universals. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danet, Brenda. 1985. Legal discourse. In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Teun A. Van Dijk (ed.), 273–291. London: Academia Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dant, Doris R. 2013. Mom and Dad but Men and Women: The sequencing of sex-determined noun pairs in American English. In Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 57], Hilde Hasselgård, Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds), 35–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ebeling, Jarle & Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell. 2013. Patterns in Contrast [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 58], Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giammarresi, Salvatore. 2010. Formulaicity and translation: A cross-corpora analysis of English formulaic binomials and their Italian translations. In Perspectives on Formulaic Language: Acquisition and Communications, David Wood (ed.), 257–74. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gustaffson, Marita. 1975. Binomial Expressions in Present-Day English. A Syntactic and Semantic Study. Turku: Turun Yliopisto. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hegarty, Peter, Watson, Nila, Fletcher, Laura & McQueen, Grant. 2011. When gentlemen are first and ladies are last: Effects of gender stereotypes on the order of romantic partners’ names. British Journal of Social Psychology 50(1): 21–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Risto. 1990. Chapters on Legal English: Aspects Past and Present of the Language of the Law. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iliev, Rumen & Smirnova, Anastasia. 2016. Revealing word order: Using serial position in binomials to predict properties of the speaker. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(2): 205–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jerrim, John & Moss, Gemma. 2019. The link between fiction and teenagers’ reading skills: International evidence from the OECD PISA study. British Educational Research Journal 45(1): 181–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jespersen, Otto. 1905. Growth and Structure of the English Language. Leipzig: Teubner. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klégr, Aleš & Čermák, Jan. 2008. Binomials in an historical English literary perspective: Shakespeare, Chaucer, Beowulf. In Shakespeare between the Middle Ages and Modernity: From Translator’s Art to Academic Discourse. A Tribute to Professor Martin Hilský, Aleš Klégr, Jan Čermák & Martin Procházka (eds). Prague: Charles University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kopaczyk, Joanna & Sauer, Hans. 2017. Binomials in the History of English. Fixed and Flexible. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1949. Les Structures élémentaires de la parenté. Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne. 2014. English Coordinate Constructions: A Processing Perspective on Constituent Order. Cambridge: CUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Love, Robbie, Dembry, Claire, Hardie, Andrew, Brezina, Vaclav & McEnery, Tony. 2017. The Spoken BNC2014: Designing and building a spoken corpus of everyday conversations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 22(3): 319–344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lohmann, Arne & Takada, Tayo. 2014. Order in NP conjuncts in spoken English and Japanese. Lingua 152: 48–64. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Malkiel, Yakov. 1959. Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8: 113–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mollin, Sandra. 2014. The (Ir)reversibility of English Binomials [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 64]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moon, Rosamund. 1998. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morgan, Emily & Levy, Roger. 2016. Abstract knowledge versus direct experience in processing of binomial expressions. Cognition 157: 384–402. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Motschenbacher, Heiko. 2013. Gentlemen before ladies? A corpus-based study of conjunct order in personal binomials. Journal of English Linguistics 41(3): 212–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikolajeva, Maria. 2014. Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature [Children’s Literature, Culture, and Cognition 3]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onishi, Kristine H., Murphy, Gregory L. & Bock, Kathryn. 2008. Prototypicality in sentence production. Cognitive Psychology 56(2): 103–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pordány, László. 1986. Irreversible binomials in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 36(1-4): 151–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reynolds, Kim. 2011. Children’s Literature: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: OUP. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siyanova-Chantura, Anna, Conklin, Kathy & van Heuven, Walter J. B. 2011. Seeing a phrase time and again matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 37(3): 776–784. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz. 1993. Unmarked-before-marked as a freezing principle. Language and Speech 36(4): 393–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tachihara, Karina & Goldberg, Adele E. 2019. Cognitive accessibility predicts word order of couples’ names in English and Japanese. Cognitive Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Saundra & Hay, Jennifer. 2002. Fred and Wilma: A phonological conspiracy. In Gendered Practices in Language, Sarah Benor, Mary Rose, Devyani Sharma, Julie Sweetland & Quing Zhang (eds), 175–91. Stanford CA: CSLI. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Saundra K., Hay, Jennifer & Bent, Tessa. 2005. Ladies first? Phonology, frequency, and the naming conspiracy. Linguistics 43(3): 531–561. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Čermáková, Anna & Michaela Mahlberg
2021. The representation of mothers and the gendered social structure of nineteenth-century children’s literature. English Text Construction 14:2 ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue