In:Time in Languages, Languages in Time
Edited by Anna Čermáková, Thomas Egan, Hilde Hasselgård and Sylvi Rørvik
[Studies in Corpus Linguistics 101] 2021
► pp. 9–38
Slavery and Britain in the 19th century
Published online: 17 September 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.101.02mce
https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.101.02mce
Abstract
This study uses a corpus of just under two billion words from one historic British newspaper, the Liverpool
Mercury, to explore shifting attitudes to slavery in Britain in the nineteenth century in the context of a port
city that benefitted from the trade. In doing so, we explore three methodological issues – how to explore concepts in
large corpora, how to do this over time and how to deal with poor quality data. Our approach to the study of concepts through
time uses a new approach to looking at word usage change over time, Usage Fluctuation Analysis (McEnery, Brezina & Baker 2019). Our exploration of the issue of poor quality data is motivated
by the variable quality of the OCR texts which constitute our nineteenth-century newspaper corpus data. Problems in data
quality bedevil work on large-scale text collections of historic material. In this paper we will show that collocation, the
core technique of UFA, can be used on such data if appropriate settings are chosen that minimise the problems arising from
poor quality electronic text, permitting the exploration of corpus data at scale.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Data and data quality
- 3.Scale
- 4.Liverpool and the slave trade
- 5.The Liverpool Mercury
- 6.Analysis
- 6.1The cessation of the slave trade
- 6.2Discussion and location
- 6.3Persistence of the slave trade
- 6.4Condemnation, opposition and support of the slave trade
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (41)
Alex, Beatrix & Burns, John. 2014. Estimating
and rating the quality of optically character recognised
text. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on
Digital Access to Textual Cultural Heritage, Madrid, Spain, Apostolos Antonacopoulos & Klaus U. Schulz (eds), 97–102. New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Anon. 1884. Liverpool and the
Slavery: An Historical Account of the Liverpool-African Slave Trade by a Genuine Dicky
Sam. Liverpool: A. Bowker and Son.
Baggett, Florence. 2014. The
Slaving Capital in the Era of Abolition: Liverpool’s Silent Rejection of the Slave Trade,
1787–1807. Master’s Thesis, Victoria University of Wellington.
Baker, Paul & Egbert, Jessie. 2016. Triangulating
Methodological Approaches in Corpus Linguistic Research. New York NY: Routledge.
Balk, Hildelies & Conteh, Aly. 2011. IMPACT:
Centre of competence in text digitisation. In
HIP ’11: Proceedings of the 2011 Workshop on Historical Document Imaging and
Processing, 155–160. Beijing,
China.
Baron, Alistair. 2011. Dealing
with Spelling Variation in Early Modern English Texts. PhD
dissertation, Lancaster University.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman
Grammar of Spoken and Written
English. Harlow: Pearson.
Brooke, Richard. 1853. Liverpool
as it was During the Last Quarter of the Eighteenth Century,
1775–1800. Liverpool: J. Mawdsley and Son.
Brookes, Gavin & McEnery, Tony. 2019. The
utility of topic modelling for discourse studies: A critical evaluation. Discourse
Studies 21(1): 3–21.
Desagulier, Guillaume. 2019. Can
word vectors help corpus linguistics? Studia
Neophilologica 91(2): 219–240.
Drescher, Seymour. 1994. Whose
abolition? Popular pressure and the ending of the British slave trade. Past and
Present 143: 136–166.
Egbert, Jessie & Baker, Paul. 2019. Using
Corpus Methods to Triangulate Linguistic Analysis. New York NY: Routledge.
Evershed, John & Fitch, Kent. 2014. Correcting
noisy OCR: context beats confusion. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the First
International Conference on Digital Access to Textual Cultural
Heritage, 45–51, Madrid,
Spain.
Flory, Céline. 2016. Between
indenture and slavery? African indentured laborers in the French West Indies
(1852–1862). Francophone Africa: Critical
Perspectives, University of Portsmouth. <[URL]> (16 January
2020).
Hitchcock, Tim. 2013. Confronting
the digital: Or how academic history writing lost the plot. Cultural and Social
History 10(1): 9–23.
Holley, Rose. 2009. How
good can it get? Analysing and improving OCR accuracy in large scale historic newspaper digitisation
programs. D-Lib
Magazine, 15(3–4). [URL] (31 March 2021).
Howman, Brian. 2007. Abolitionism
in Liverpool. In Liverpool and Transatlantic
Slavery, David Richardson, Suzanne Schwarz & Anthony Tibbles (eds), 277–296. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Huzzey, Richard. 2010. Free
trade, free labour, and slave sugar in Victorian Britain. The Historical
Journal 53(2): 359–379.
Joulain, Amelia T. 2017. Corpus Linguistics for
History: The Methodology of Investigating Place-name Discourses. PhD
dissertation, Lancaster University.
Kaufmann, Chaim D. & Pape, Robert A. 1999. Explaining
costly international moral action: Britain’s sixty-year campaign against the Atlantic slave
trade. International
Organisation 53(4): 631–668.
King, Edmund. 2005. Digitisation
of newspapers at the British Library. The Serials
Librarian 49(1): 165–181.
Loy, Wesley. 1997. 10
Rumford Place: Doing confederate business in Liverpool. South Carolina Historical
Society 98(4): 349–374.
McEnery, Tony & Baker, Helen. 2017. Corpus
Linguistics and 17 th Century
Prostitution. London: Bloomsbury.
McEnery, Tony, Baker, Helen & Dayrell, Carmen. 2019. Working
at the interface of hydrology and corpus linguistics: Using corpora to identify unrecorded droughts in
nineteenth-century Britain. In Using Corpus Methods to
Triangulate Linguistic Analysis, Jessie Egbert & Paul Baker (eds), 52–84. New York NY: Routledge.
McEnery, Tony, Brezina, Vaclav & Baker, Helen. 2019. Usage
fluctuation analysis: A new way of analysing shifts in historical
discourse. International Journal of Corpus
Linguistics 24(4): 413–414.
Morgan, K. 2007. Liverpool’s
dominance in the British slave trade, 1740–1807. In Liverpool
and Transatlantic Slavery, David Richardson, Suzanne Schwarz & Anthony Tibbles (eds), 14–42. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Mulligan, William. 2009. The
fugitive slave circulars, 1875–76. Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth
History 37(2): 183–205.
Partington, Alan. 2003. The
Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf Pack at the White
House. London: Routledge.
Partington, Alan, Duguid, Alison & Taylor, Charlotte. 2013. Patterns
and Meanings in Discourse Theory and Practice in Corpus-assisted Discourse Studies
(CADS) [Studies in Corpus Linguistics
55]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Prescott, Andrew. 2014. I’d
rather be a librarian: A response to Tim Hitchcock, confronting the digital. Cultural
and Social
History 11(3): 335–341.
Sherwood, Marika. 2007. After
Abolition: Britain and the Slave Trade since
1807. London: I.B. Tauris.
Sherwood, Marika & Sherwood, Kim (2007). Britain,
the Slave Trade and Slavery, from 1562 to the
1880s. Kent: Savannah Press.
Smithers, Henry. 1825. Liverpool,
its Commerce, Statistics, and Institutions: with a History of the Cotton
Trade. Liverpool: Thomas Kaye.
Smitterberg, Erik. 2014. Syntactic
stability and change in nineteenth-century newspaper
language. In Late Modern English
Syntax, Marianne Hundt (ed.), 311–330. Cambridge: CUP.
Tanner, Simon, Muñoz, Trevor & Ros, Pich H. 2009. Measuring mass
text digitization quality and Usefulness. D-Lib
Magazine 15 (7–8): 1082–9873. <[URL]> (31
March 2021).
Temperley, Howard. 1972. British
Antislavery, 1833–1870. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Baker, Helen & Tony McEnery
2025. Transformations and the dynamics of memory. In News with an Attitude [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 105], ► pp. 82 ff.
Caple, Helen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
