Article published In: Second language pragmatic development in study abroad contexts
Edited by Ariadna Sánchez-Hernández
[Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 7:1] 2022
► pp. 152–175
The impact of predeparture instruction on pragmatic development during study abroad
A learning strategies perspective
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.
For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.
Published online: 19 April 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.21006.mat
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.21006.mat
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of a predeparture intervention on developing pragmatic knowledge in a study abroad context. The study included 66 university-level Japanese learners of English who participated in a four-month study abroad program in Canada. The intervention consisted of the implicit-inductive, explicit-deductive, and explicit-inductive methods of instruction on speech acts. Pragmatic development was measured by gain scores on a written a discourse completion test requiring realization of apologies. Results of the analysis of covariance, controlling for levels of English proficiency, revealed that the explicitly taught groups had significantly larger gains in pragmatic knowledge than the implicitly taught group, and that when comparing the deductive and inductive approaches in the explicit instruction, the two groups did not differ significantly. Follow-up interviews using extreme-case sampling revealed that the metacognitive strategies they had acquired at the predeparture stage contributed to the gains. Implications for maximizing pragmatic development during study abroad are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background
- 2.1Predeparture instruction on L2 pragmatics
- 2.2Methods of pragmatics instruction
- 2.3Research questions
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Settings of the predeparture orientation course
- 3.3Treatment procedure
- 3.4Quantitative phase
- 3.4.1Data collection
- 3.4.2Instrument
- 3.4.3Data analysis
- 3.5Qualitative phase
- 3.5.1Data collection
- 3.5.2Data analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Descriptive statistics
- 4.2Analysis of covariance
- 4.3Analysis of the interview data
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Notes
References
References (40)
Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Pragmatic learning and study abroad: Effects of instruction and length of stay. System, 481, 62–74.
Bennett, J. M. (2008). On becoming a global soul: A path to engagement during study abroad. In V. Savicki (Ed.), Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education (pp. 13–31). Stylus.
Cohen, A. D. (2005). Strategies for learning and performing L2 speech acts. Intercultural Pragmatics, 2–31, 275–301.
(2020). Considerations in assessing pragmatic appropriateness in spoken language. Language Teaching, 531, 183–202.
Cohen, A. D., & Shively, R. L. (2007). Acquisition of requests and apologies in Spanish and French: Impact of study abroad and strategy-building intervention. The Modern Language Journal, 911, 189–212.
Cohen, A. D., & Sykes, J. M. (2013). Strategy-based learning of pragmatics for intercultural education. In F. Dervin, & A. Liddicoat (Eds.), Linguistics for intercultural education in language learning and teaching (pp. 87–111). John Benjamins.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16–29.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Blackwell.
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2008). Teaching Spanish pragmatics in the classroom: Explicit instruction of mitigation. Hispania, 911, 477–492.
Fordyce, K. (2014). The differential effects of explicit and implicit instruction on EFL learners’ use of epistemic stance. Applied Linguistics, 351, 6–28.
Glaser, K. (2013). The neglected combination: A case for explicit-inductive instruction in teaching pragmatics in ESL. TESOL Canada Journal, 301, 150–163.
(2016). News from the pragmatics classroom: Contrasting the inductive and the deductive approach in the teaching of pragmatic competence. Intercultural Pragmatics, 13(4), 529–561.
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2017). Explicit instruction of spoken requests: An examination of predeparture instruction and the study abroad environment. System, 681, 26–37.
Henery, A. (2015). On the development of metapragmatic awareness abroad: Two case studies exploring the role of expert-mediation. Language Awareness, 241, 316–331.
Hernández, T. A., & Boero, P. (2018). Explicit intervention for Spanish pragmatic development during short-term study abroad: An examination of learner request production and cognition. Foreign Language Annals, 511, 389–410.
Hirschberg, J. (2006). Pragmatics and intonation. In L. Horn, & G. Ward (Eds.), The handbook of pragmatics (pp. 515–537). Blackwell.
Ishihara, N., & Cohen, A. D. (2010). Teaching and learning pragmatics: Where language and culture meet. Routledge.
Kinginger, C. (2011). English language learning in study abroad. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 58–73.
Martínez-Flor, A., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2007). Developing pragmatic awareness of suggestions in the EFL classroom: A focus on instructional effects. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 101, 47–76.
Matsumura, S. (2003). Modelling the relationships among interlanguage pragmatic development, L2 proficiency, and exposure to L2. Applied Linguistics, 241, 465–491.
Nguyen, M. T. T. (2017). Using conversation tasks and retrospective methodology to investigate L2 pragmatics development: The case of EFL criticisms and responses to criticisms. The Language Learning Journal, 45(3), 399–417.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2020). Education at a glance 2020: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing.
Paige, R. M., Cohen, A. D., & Shively, R. L. (2004). Assessing the impact of strategies-based curriculum on language and culture learning abroad. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 101, 253–276.
Pérez Vidal, C., & Shively, R. L. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 355–371). Routledge.
Rogosa, D. (1988). Myths about longitudinal research. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. M. Meredith, & S. C. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 171–209). Springer.
Shively, R. L. (2010). From the virtual world to the real world: A model of pragmatics instruction for study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 431, 105–137.
(2011). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad: A longitudinal study of Spanish service encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 431, 1818–1835.
Simin, S., Eslami, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Ketabi, S. (2014). The effects of explicit teaching of apologies on Persian EFL learners’ performance: When e-communication helps. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 31, 71–84.
Sykes, J. M., & Cohen, A. D. (2018). Strategies and interlanguage pragmatics: Explicit and comprehensive. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 381–402.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson International Education.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 481, 1–50.
(2018). Pragmatic competence in foreign language education: Cultivating learner autonomy and strategic learning of pragmatics. In I. Walker, D. K. G. Chan, M. Nagami, & C. Bourguignon (Eds.), New perspectives on the development of communicative and related competence in foreign language education (pp. 53–69). Mouton De Gruyter.
Taguchi, N., & Sykes, J. M. (2013). Technology in interlanguage pragmatics research and teaching. John Benjamins.
Takahashi, S. (2010). The effect of pragmatic instruction on speech act performance. In A. Martínez-Flor, & E. Usó-Juan (Eds.), Speech act performance: Theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues (pp. 127–142). John Benjamins.
Takimoto, M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction on the development of language learners’ pragmatic competence. The Modern Language Journal, 921, 369–386.
Cited by (11)
Cited by 11 other publications
Liu, Xiaowen
2025. “Shall we talk? Everyone is talking”. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 10:2 ► pp. 225 ff.
Chen, Junming & Martin Howard
Devlin, Anne Marie, Annarita Magliacane & Michał B. Paradowski
Jin, Tinghe & John P. O’Regan
Seabela, Marcia M. & Thobeka Ncanywa
Tajeddin, Zia & Neda Khanlarzadeh
Derakhshan, Ali & Farzaneh Shakki
Shively, Rachel L.
Shively, Rachel L.
Shakki, Farzaneh
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
