Article published In: Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education
Vol. 3:2 (2018) ► pp.220–242
Acquisition of formulaic sequences in a study abroad context
Published online: 12 October 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.17009.qua
https://doi.org/10.1075/sar.17009.qua
Abstract
Research (e.g., (2010a). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. London: Continuum.) suggests that study abroad (SA) and the use of formulaic
language (FL), or sequences of words that tend to go together, aid L2 oral fluency. Nonetheless, there is conflicting evidence
regarding whether quantity of L2 use abroad is a predictor of language outcomes. This article examines the acquisition of FL by US
L2 learners of Spanish (n = 11) who studied abroad in Spain. The study measures the temporal fluency variables
and the formula/run ratio of narrative retell tasks pre- and post-SA by L2 learners and native Spanish speakers. The findings
indicate that regardless of program type and length, learners produce more FL post-SA, but they are still far from target-like
usage. Moreover, participants’ mean length of run is directly related to the formula/run ratio. Lastly, an analysis of language
use shows no direct relationship between L2 use abroad and oral fluency outcomes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Review of previous research
- 2.1Formulaic language and L2 oral fluency
- 2.2Acquisition of formulaic sequences and study abroad
- 3.Method
- 3.1Participants
- 3.2Data collection and procedures
- 3.2.1Narrative retell task
- 3.2.2Bi-weekly language use survey
- 3.3Data analysis
- 3.3.1Oral fluency measures
- 3.4Identifying formulaic sequences
- 3.4.1Formula/run ratio
- 3.4.2N-gram frequency and mutual information (MI)
- 3.5Statistical analysis
- 4.Results
- 4.1Pre- and post-SA oral fluency measures and formula/run ratio
- 4.2L2 learners and NSs
- 4.3Relationship among oral fluency measures
- 4.4Relationship among oral fluency measures, FRR, and Spanish use
- 5.Discussion
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (47)
Baker-Smemoe, W., Dewey, D., Bown, J., & Martinsen, R. (2014). Variables affecting L2 gains during study abroad. Foreign Language Annals, 47, (3) 464–486.
Barlow, M. (2004). Collocate 1.0 Locating collocations and terminology [Computer software]. Houston, TX: Athelstan.
Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., Kappel, J., Stengers, H., & Demecheleer, M. (2006). Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a Lexical Approach to the test. Language Teaching Research, 10(3), 245–261.
Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 45–61.
Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicológica, 321, 133–143.
De Jong, N. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Fluency training in the ESL classroom: An experimental study of fluency development and proceduralization. Language Learning, 61(2), 533–568.
De Jong, N. H., & Wempe, T. (2009). Praat script to detect syllable nuclei and measure speech rate automatically. Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 385–390.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Study abroad as foreign language practice. In R. M. DeKeyser (Ed.), Practice in a second language: Perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology (pp. 208–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ejzenberg, R. (2000). The juggling act of oral fluency: A psycho-sociolinguistic metaphor. In H. Riggenbach (Ed.), Perspectives on fluency (pp. 287–313). Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Ellis, N. C. (2012). Formulaic language and second language acquisition: Zipf and the phrasal teddy bear. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 321, 17–44.
(2015). Cognitive and social aspects of learning from usage. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-based perspectives on second language learning (pp. 49–73). Boston: Mouton De Gruyter.
Freed, B. F. (1995). What makes us think that students who study abroad become fluent? In B. F. Freed. (Ed.), Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 123–148). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Freed, B. F., Dewey, D., Segalowitz, N., & Halter, R. (2004). The Language Contact Profile. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 349–356.
Freed, B. F., Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, D. P. (2004). Context of learning and second language and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275–301.
Groom, N. (2009). Effects of L2 immersion on L2 collocational development. In A. Barfield and H. Gyllstad (Eds.), Researching collocations in another language (pp. 21–33). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hernández, T. A. (2010). The relationship among motivation, interaction, and the development of second language oral proficiency in a study-abroad context. Modern Language Journal, 94, (4) 600–617.
(2011). Enhancing language learning in study abroad. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 58–73.
Lin, P. M. S. (2010). The phonology of formulaic sequences: A review. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 174–193). London: Continuum.
Mason, L., Powers, C., & Donnelly, S. (2015). The Boren Awards: A report of oral language proficiency gains during academic study abroad: A cumulative report over 15 years and 53 languages. Institute of International Education, (September), 1–25; Appendices A–D.
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
Morley, J., & Truscott, S. (2006). Fluency development in advanced language learners. In T. Harden, A. Witte, & D. Köhler, (Eds.), The concept of progression in the teaching and learning of foreign languages (pp. 307–322). Bern: Peter Lang.
Nattinger, J. R., & DeCarrico, J. S. (1992). Formulaic sequences and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In J. C. Richards & R. W. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). New York, NY: Longman.
Sanz, C. (2016, April 10). SLA in study abroad contexts: A researcher-practitioner’s perspective. Address presented at American Association for Applied Linguistics, Orlando, FL.
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 111, 129–158.
Schmitt, N., Dörnyei, Z., Adolphs, S., & Durow, V. (2004). Knowledge and acquisition of formulaic sequences: A longitudinal study. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 55–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2013). Formulaic language in academic study [Powerpoint slides]. Retrieved from <[URL]>
Segalowitz, N., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning Spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 173–199.
Segalowitz, N., Freed, B., Collentine, J., Lafford, B., Lazar, N., & Díaz-Campos, M. (2004). A comparison of Spanish second language acquisition in two different learning contexts: Study abroad and the domestic classroom. Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad, 101, 1–18.
Serrano, R., Stengers, H., & Housen, A. (2015). Acquisition of formulaic sequences in intensive and regular EFL programmes. Language Teaching Research, 19, (1) 89–106.
Stengers, H. F., Boers, F., Eyckmans, J., & Housen, A. (2010). Does chunking foster chunk uptake? In S. De Knop, F. Boers & T. De Rycker (Eds.), Fostering language teaching efficiency through cognitive linguistics (pp. 99–117). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84–119.
Trentman, E. (2013). Imagined communities and language learning during study abroad: Arabic learners in Egypt. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 545–564.
Valls-Ferrer, M., & Mora, J. C. (2014). L2 fluency development in formal instruction and study abroad. In C. Pérez Vidal (Ed.) Language acquisition in study abroad and formal instruction contexts (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Weinert, R. (2010). Formulaicity and usage-based language: Linguistic, psycholinguistic and acquisitional manifestations. In D. Wood (Ed.), Perspectives on formulaic language: Acquisition and communication (pp. 1–22). London: Continuum.
Wood, D. (2007). Mastering the English formula: Fluency development of Japanese learners in a study abroad context. JALT Journal, 29(2), 209–230.
(2010a). Formulaic language and second language speech fluency: Background, evidence, and classroom applications. London: Continuum.
Wood, D., & Namba, K. (2013, April). Focused instruction of formulaic language: Use and awareness in a Japanese university class. Paper presented at the Asian Conference on Language Learning. <[URL]>
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Schwieter, John W., Gabrielle Klassen & Martin Howard
Güvendir, Emre, Judith Borràs & Meltem Acar Güvendir
2024. The effects of study abroad on L2 vocabulary development. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 9:1 ► pp. 26 ff.
Tajeddin, Zia & Neda Khanlarzadeh
Pérez-Vidal, Carmen & Cristina Sanz
2023. Research methods in study abroad. In Methods in Study Abroad Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 4], ► pp. 9 ff.
Tang, Xiaofei, Naoko Taguchi & Shuai Li
2021. Social contact and speech act strategies in a Chinese study abroad context. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education 6:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
