In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXII: Papers selected from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Tempe, Arizona, 2018
Edited by Elly van Gelderen
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 9] 2020
► pp. 71–108
On the syntax of correlation: Evidence from Egyptian Arabic
Published online: 28 August 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.9.04sol
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.9.04sol
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to describe and analyze the syntax of
two types of correlation structures (CSs) in Egyptian Arabic (EA): A structure
introduced by the quantifier kull (‘every’), and another introduced
by the measure PP ʕalā Ɂadd (literally, ‘on/by amount’). More
specifically, it is shown that both types of structures involve subordination, where
the first clause is subordinate to the second. A syntactic analysis along the lines
of den Dikken (2005) and Taylor (2013) for comparative correlatives is
first shown to account for the main grammatical properties of both types of CSs in
EA. A cartographic implementation of the analysis is then proposed to account for a
wider range of empirical data related to CSs, including their information structure
properties. The data and analysis presented in this paper thus add to the body of
empirical literature on CSs cross-linguistically, while showing that their
grammatical properties do follow under standard syntactic analysis, and that
analyzing such structures as ‘constructional’ primitives of the grammar is
unnecessary.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.The grammatical properties of correlation structures in EA
- 2.1Type A of correlation structures in EA
- 2.2Type B of correlation structures in EA
- 3.The macro-syntax of correlation structures
- 4.The micro-syntax of correlation structures
- 4.1Deriving correlation structures in EA
- 4.2Lexical doubling in CSs as a post-syntactic operation
- 4.3Summary
- 5.A cartographic analysis of the micro-syntax of correlation structures
- 6.Brief remarks on ‘constructions’
- 7.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (41)
Abeillé, A., & Borsley, R. D. (2008). Comparative
correlatives and
parameters. Lingua, 118, 1139–1157.
Al-Khalīl (718–786) & Sībawayh
(ca. 765–796). Al-Kitāb. A 1988
edition. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Khangi Bookshop.
Alqurashi, A. A., & Borsley, R. D. (2014). The
Comparative correlative construction in Modern Standard
Arabic. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings
of the 21st International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar,
University at
Buffalo (pp. 6–26). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Beck, S. (1997). On
the semantics of comparative
conditionals. Linguistics and
Philosophy, 20, 229–271.
Bhatt, R. (2009). Comments
on ‘Comparative correlatives in Greek: The syntax of
oso’. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman, & D. Hill (Eds.), MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics 57: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Greek
Syntax and Semantics at
MIT (pp. 107–122). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
Borgonovo, C., & Valmala, V. (2010). The
syntax of Spanish comparative
correlatives. In B. Hollebrandse, B. Kampers-Manhe, & R. Bok-Bennema (Eds.), Romance
Languages and Linguistic Theory 2008: Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’
Groningen
2008 (pp. 17–35). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Borsley, R. D. (2003). On
the Polish periphery: Comparative correlatives in
Polish. In P. Banski & A. Przepiórkowski (Eds.), GLIP-5:
Proceedings of Fifth Generative Linguistics in Poland
Conference (pp. 15–28). Warsaw, Poland: Polish Academy of Science.
(2004). An
Approach to English Comparative
Correlatives. In S. Müller (Ed.) Proceedings
of the 11th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure
Grammar (pp. 70–92). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
(2011). Constructions,
functional heads, and comparative
correlatives. In O. Bonami & P. C. Hofherr (Eds.), Empirical
Issues in Syntax and Semantics
8 (pp. 7–20). Available
at: [URL]
Chaves, R. (2012). On
the grammar of extraction and
coordination. Natural Language and Linguistic
Theory, 30, 465–512.
(2000). Minimalist
inquiries: The
framework. In M. Roger, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step
by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard
Lasnik (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
(2001). Derivation
by Phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken
Hale: A Life in
Language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Culicover, P. W., & Jackendoff, R. (1999). The
View from the periphery: The English comparative
correlative. Linguistic
Inquiry, 30, 543–571.
Dooley, S. (2014). The
Swedish comparative correlative construction: Ju…
Desto… and
variations. In B. Lyngfelt & C. Wide (Eds.), a
special issue of Constructions. Available
at: [URL]
E,
C. (2014). The Syntax of
comparative correlatives in Mandarin
Chinese. PhD
Dissertation, University of Arizona.
Heim, I. (1982). The
semantics of definite and indefinite noun
phrases. PhD
Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hsiao, S. (2003). On
proportional correlative constructions in Chinese and
Mongolian. Journal of Taiwanese Languages and
Literature, 1, 239–267.
Huber, S. (2007). Comparative
correlatives – The case of
German. In T. Crane, O. David, D. Fenton, H. J. Haynie, S. Katseff, R. Lee-Goldman, R. Rouvier, & D. Yu (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society (pp. 220–231).
Iwasaki, E., & Radford, A. (2009). Comparative
correlatives in English: A minimalist-cartographic
analysis. Essex Research Reports in
Linguistics, Vol. 57.6. University of Essex, Colchester, UK. Available at: [URL]
Jespersen, O. (1961). A
modern English grammar on historical
principles. London: George Allen and Unwin/Copenhagen: Munksgaard.
Kapetangianni, K., & Taylor, H. L. (2009). Comparative
correlatives in Greek: The syntax of
oso. In C. Halpert, J. Hartman, & D. Hill (Eds.), MIT
Working Papers in Linguistics 57: Proceedings of the 2007 Workshop on Greek
Syntax and Semantics at
MIT (pp. 91–105). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.
Leung, T. T-C. (2003). Comparative
correlatives and parallel occurrence of
elements. PhD screening
paper, University of Southern California.
Lewis, D. (1975). Adverbs
of
quantification. In E. Keenan (Ed.), Formal
Semantics of Natural
Language (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lin, J. (2007). On
the semantics of comparative correlatives in Mandarin
Chinese. Journal of
Semantics, 24, 169–213.
McCawley, J. D. (1988). The
comparative conditional constructions in English, German and
Chinese. In S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, & H. Singmaster (Eds.), Proceedings
of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics
Society (pp. 176–187).
Michaelis, L. (1994). A
case of constructional polysemy in Latin. Studies
in
Language, 18, 45–70.
Pesetsky, D. (1987). Wh-in-situ:
Movement and unselective
binding. In E. J. Reuland & A. G. B. ter Meulen (Eds.), The
representation of
(in)definiteness (pp. 98–129). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Rizzi, L. (1997). The
fine structure of the left
periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements
of
Grammar (281–337). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Soltan, U. (2009). Agree
in the functional domain: Evidence from the morphosyntax of positive and
negative imperatives in Standard
Arabic. In A. Ojo & L. Moshi (Eds.), Selected
Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference on African
Linguistics (pp. 86–99). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available at: [URL]
(2011). On
strategies of question-formation and the grammatical status of the Q-particle
huwwa in Egyptian Arabic
wh-questions. In L. Friedman (Ed.), University
of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics Volume 17: Issue 1, Article
24. Available at: [URL]
(2019). On Two Types of Correlation Structures in Egyptian Arabic. In R. Stockwell, M. O’Leary, Z. Xu, and Z. L. Zhou (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 316–325). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. Available at: [URL]
Srivastav, V. (1991). The
syntax and semantics of correlatives. Natural
Language and Linguistic
Theory, 9, 637–686.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
