Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015
Edited by Hamid Ouali
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 5] 2017
► pp. 181–204

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
Arabic first conjunct agreement and the interaction between constraints on agree & movement

 | Stanford University
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.5.08cro
Abstract
I argue that Arabic first conjunct agreement (FCA) is the result of interaction between independently motivated constraints on the operation agree and on movement. This analysis compares favorably to recent proposals of FCA that must stipulate that particular syntactic operations may occur late in syntactic derivation. The current proposal renders such assumptions about late operations unnecessary, while also demonstrating that analyses that rely on such operations fail to account for cases in which FCA and full agreement are realized on distinct inflection-bearing elements within the same clause. The analysis presented here is based primarily on data from Lebanese Arabic, although thoughts are also offered on the applicability of the analysis to Standard Arabic.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.First conjunct agreement in Lebanese Arabic
    • 2.1Theoretical assumptions
    • 2.2Assumptions about Arabic clause structure and coordination
    • 2.3The general structure of the analysis
    • 2.4Clauses with no auxiliary
    • 2.5Clauses with an auxiliary
  • 3.Late operations analyses
    • 3.1Overview of “Late Operations” analyses
    • 3.2Late operations and mixed agreement
  • 4.Conclusion
    • 4.1First conjunct agreement in standard Arabic
    • 4.2The cross-linguistic perspective
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Abdou, A. (2012). Arabic Idioms: A Corpus-Based Study. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ackema, P. & Neelman, A. (2003). Context-sensitive spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, (21)(4), 681–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Agreement weakening at PF: A reply to Benmamoun and Lorimor. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(1), 75–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Sportiche, D. (1994). Agreement, word order, and conjunction in some varieties of Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry, 25(2), 195–220.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aoun, J., Benmamoun, E., & Choueiri, L. (2010). The Syntax of Arabic. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. and Pullum, G. K. (1990). A Theory of Command Relations. Linguistics & Philosophy, 13(1), 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barker, C. (2012). Quantificational Binding Does Not Require C-Command. Linguistic Inquiry, 43(4), 614–633.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. (2000). The Feature Structure of Functional Categories. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E., Bhatia, A., & Polinsky, M. (2009). Closest conjunct agreement in head final languages. In Van Craenenbroeck, J. and Rooryck, J. (Eds.) Linguistic Variation Yearbook (Vol. 9). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benmamoun, E. and Lorimor, H. (2006). Featureless expressions: When morphophonological markers are absent. Linguistic Inquiry, 37(1), 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatt, R. and Walkow, M. (2013). Locating agreement in grammar: An argument from agreement in conjunctions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 31(4)L 951–1013. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. (2008). Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Harbour, D., Adger, D., & Béjar, S. (Eds.) Phi theory: Phi-features across modules and inferfaces (pp. 295–328). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bošković, Ž (2007). On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal Theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 38(4), 589–644. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Unifying first and last conjunct agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 27(3), 455–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1993). A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In Hale, K. & Keyser, J. (Eds.) The view from building 20 (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Martin, R., Michaels, D., & Uriagereka, J. (Eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–156). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Derivation by phase. In Kenstowicz, M. (Ed.) Ken Hale: A Life in Linguistics (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doron, E. (2000). VSO and left-conjunct agreement: Biblical Hebrew vs. Modern Hebrew. In Carnie, A. and Guilfoyle, E. (Eds.) The Syntax of Verb Initial Languages (pp. 75–96). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, J. (1978). The verbal complex V′-V in French. Linguistic Inquiry, 9(2), 151–175.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, A. (1993). Issues in the Structure of Arabic Clauses and Words. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, D. & Nissenbaum, J. (1999). Extraposition and scope: a case for overt QR. In Bird, S., Carnie, A., Haugen, J., & Norquest, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 18. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harbert, W. and Bahloul, M. (2002). Postverbal subjects in Arabic and the theory of agreement. In Ouhalla, J. & Shlonsky, U. (Eds.) Themes in Arabic and Hebrew Syntax (pp. 45–70). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hornstein, N. (2009). A Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayne, R. (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Koppen, M. (2005). One Probe – Two Goals: Aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects (Doctoral dissertation). Landelijke Onderzoekschool Taalwetenschap, Utrecht.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). The distribution of phi-features in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 30(1), 135–177. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larson, B. (2013). Arabic conjunct-sensitive agreement and primitive operations. Linguistic Inquiry, 44(4), 611–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lebeaux, D. (1988). Language acquisition and the form of grammar (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
LeTourneau, M. (2003). Interpretability, feature strength, and impoverished agreement in Arabic. In Parkinson, D. & Farwaneh, S. (Eds.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (Vol. 15). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marantz, A. (1984). On the Nature of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, J. (1986). Inflection and conjunction in modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 4(2), 245–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merchant, J. (2011). Aleut case matters. In Yuasa, E., Bagchi, T., & Beals, K. (Eds.) Pragmatics and Autolexical Grammar: In honor of Jerry Sadock (pp. 382–411). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munn, A. (1993). Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999). First conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry, 30(4), 643–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nevins, A. (2004). Derivations without the activity condition. In MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 49 (pp. 287–310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouali, H. (2014). Multiple agreement in Arabic. In Khamis-Dakwar, R. & Froud, K. (Eds.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (Vol. 26). New York: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E. (2007). The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Karimi, S., Samiian, V., & Wilkins, W. (Eds.) Phrasal and Clausal Architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation in honor of Joseph E. Emonds (pp. 262–294). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pollack, J. -Y. (1989). Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(3), 365–424.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preminger, O. (2014). Agreement and Its Failures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (1976). The Syntactic Domain of Anaphora (Doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ross, J. (1967). Constraints on Variables in Syntax (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soltan, U. (2007). On Agree and postcyclic merge in syntractic derivations: First conjunct agreement in Standard Arabic. In Benmamoun, E. (Ed.) Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics (Vol. 19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). On issues of Arabic syntax: An essay in syntactic argumentation. Brill’s Annual of Afroasiatic Language and Linguistics, 3, 236–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tucker, M. (2011). The morphosyntax of the Arabic verb: Toward a unified syntax-prosody. In Morphology at Santa Cruz: Papers in Honor of Jorge Hankamer. Santa Cruz, CA: Linguistics Research Center Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (2002). Pure adjuncts. University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walkow, M. (2013). When Can You Agree with a Closest Conjunct? In Santana-LaBarge, R. (Ed.) Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 31. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2010). There is only one way to agree. Paper presented at the 33rd GLOW Colloquium. Wroclaw, Poland.
Zoener, C. (1995). Coordination: The Syntax of &P (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Albaty, Yasser & Hamid Ouali
2018. Restructuring and control in Arabic. Brill’s Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 10:2 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue