Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015
Edited by Hamid Ouali
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 5] 2017
► pp. 55–88

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 3
Acoustic properties of prominence and foot structure in Arabic

 | University of Delaware
 | University of Delaware
 | University of Delaware
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.5.04vog
Abstract
The acoustic properties of stress and focus prominence are examined in a large, systematically structured corpus of Arabic collected in Amman, Jordan. A modified version of the Functional Load Hypothesis correctly predicts that duration, a contrastive property of Arabic vowels, will not constitute the main cue of either prominence type as this would obscure its phonemic role. Instead, both Binary Logistic Regression Analyses and descriptive analyses indicate F0 as the main cue for both types of prominence. In addition, duration and F0 patterns reveal word-final lengthening and boundary effects. These lead to a modification of the stress assignment algorithm that permits the construction of uneven trimoraic trochees, as opposed to limiting feet to bimoraic trochees.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Prominence properties in Arabic
    • 2.1Stress assignment and foot structure
    • 2.2Acoustic properties of stress and focus in Arabic
  • 3.Experimental investigation of prominence properties in Arabic
    • 3.1The acoustic properties of prominence in Arabic and the Functional Load Hypothesis
    • 3.2Experimental design
      • 3.2.1Participants
      • 3.2.2Procedure
      • 3.2.3Stimuli
      • 3.2.4Analysis
    • 3.3Analysis of duration and foot structure
  • 4.Results: Acoustic properties of stress and focus
    • 4.1Binary logistic regression analyses
    • 4.2Descriptive results
    • 4.3Discussion of results for the acoustic properties of stress and focus
  • 5.Stress and foot structure revisited
    • 5.1Duration measurements in three syllables
    • 5.2Foot structure revisited: (Trimoraic) trochees
    • 5.3Additional F0 measurements
  • 6.General discussion
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (46)
References
Abdo, D. A. (1969). Stress and Arabic phonology. PhD. Dissertation: University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adank, P., Smits, R., & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of Acoustical Society of America, 116(5), 3099–3107. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ahn, M. J. (2002). Phonetic and functional bases of syllable weight for stress assignment. PhD. Dissertation: University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Mozaini, H. A., Bley-Uroman, R., & McCarthy, J. J. (1985). Stress shift and metrical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 16, 135–144.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angoujard, J. -P. (1990). Metrical structure of Arabic. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berinstein, A. E. (1979). A cross-linguistic study on the perception and production of stress. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 47, 1–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, P. & Weenink, D. (2015). Praat doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] [URL].
Brame, M. K. (1970). Arabic phonology: Implications for phonological theory and historical Semitic. PhD. Dissertation: MIT.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1973). On stress in two Arabic dialects. In S. R. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle (pp. 14–25). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1974). The cycle in phonology: Stress in Palestinian, Maltese and Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 5, 39–60.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broselow, E. (1976). The phonology of Egyptian Arabic. PhD. Dissertation: University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). Parametric variation in Arabic dialect phonology. In M. Eid & J. J. McCarthy (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics, IV (pp. 7–47). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2008). Stress–epenthesis interactions. In B. Vaux & A. Nevins (Eds.), Rules, constraints, and phonological phenomena (pp. 121–148). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Broselow, E., Chen, S. -I., & Huffman, M. (1997). Syllable weight: convergence of phonology and phonetics. Phonology, 14, 47–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chahal, D. (2003). Phonetic Cues to Prominence Levels in Lebanese Arabic. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona. 2067–2070.
Chahal, D. & Hellmuth, S. (2015). Comparing the intonational phonology of Lebanese and Egyptian Arabic. In S. -A. Jun (Ed.), Prosodic Typology, Volume 2 (pp. 365–404). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chávez-Peón, M. (2008). Phonetic cues to stress in a tonal language: Prosodic prominence in San Lucas Quiaviní Zapotec. In S. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. [URL].
(2010). The interaction of metrical structure, tone, and phonation types in Quiaviní Zapotec. PhD Dissertation: University of British Columbia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, K. (1995). The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(1), 491–504. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Jong, K. & Zawaydeh, B. (1999). Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2002). Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 53–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farwaneh, S. (1995). Directionality effects in Arabic dialect syllable structure. PhD. Dissertation: University of Utah.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glover, B. C. (1988). The Morphophonology of Muscat Arabic. PhD. Dissertation: UCLA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Irshied, O. & Kestowicz, M. (1984). Some phonological rules of Bani-Hassan Arabic: A Bedouin dialect. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 14, 109–147.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kager, R. (2009). Stress. In K. Versteegh, M. Eid, A. Elgibali, M. Woidich, & A. Zaborski (Eds.), The encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics, Volume 4 (pp. 344–353). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaye, A. S. (1997). Arabic Phonology. In A. S. Kaye (Ed.), Phonologies of Asia and Africa, Volume 1 (pp. 187–204). Winona Lake: Eiserbrauns.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. (1983). Parametric variation and accent: The Arabic dialects. Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 19, 205–213.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1986). Notes on syllable structure in three Arabic dialects. Revue Quebecoise de Linguistique, 16, 101–128. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kenstowicz, M. & Abu-Karim, K. (1980). Cyclic stress in Levantine Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 10(2), 55–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, R. (1967). Functional load and sound change, Language, 43, 831–852. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. M. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 49, 606–608. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Majdi, B. (1988). Iraqi Arabic morphophonemics. PhD. Dissertation: University of Connecticut.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. (1979). On stress and syllabification. Linguistic Inquiry, 10, 443–465.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1980). A note on the accentuation of Damascene Arabic. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 10, 77–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. & Prince, A. (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 209–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitchell, T. F. (1960). Prominence and syllabification in Arabic. Bulletin of SOAS, 2, 369–389. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitleb, F. (1984). Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: a spectrographic test. Journal of Phonetics, 12, 229–235.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Odden, D. (1989). Aspects of Iraqi Arabic verbal phonology. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 8(1), 137–152.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potisuk, S., Gandour, J., & Harper, M. (1996). Acoustic correlates of stress in Thai. Phonetica, 53, 200–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Remijsen, B. (2002). Lexically contrastive accent and lexical tone in Ma’ya. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology, 7 (pp. 585–614). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, I., Athanasopoulou, A., & Pincus, N. (2015). Acoustic Properties of Prominence in Hungarian and the Functional Load Hypothesis. In É. Dékány, K. É. Kiss, & B. Surányi (Eds.), Approaches to Hungarian, 14 (pp. 267–292). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Prominence, contrast and the functional load hypothesis: An acoustic investigation. J. Heinz, R. Goedemans, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), Dimensions of phonological stress (pp. 123–167). Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watson, J. C. E. (2002). The phonology and morphology of Arabic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Word stress in Arabic. In M. van Ooosterdorp, C. J. Ewen, E. V. Hume, & K. Rice (Eds.), Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Volume 5 (pp. 2990–3019). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winn, M., Blodgett, A., Bauman, J., Bowles, A., Charters, L., Rytting, A., & Shamoo, J. (2008). A comparison of native speaker and American adult learner Vietnamese lexical tones. CASL Technical Report. [URL].
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Albadar, Iman & Irene Vogel
2023. Are Arabic listeners “stress deaf” to their own L2 pronunciation?. In Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIV [Studies in Arabic Linguistics, 12], ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
ATHANASOPOULOU, ANGELIKI, IRENE VOGEL & NADYA PINCUS
2021. Prosodic prominence in a stressless language: An acoustic investigation of Indonesian. Journal of Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 695 ff. DOI logo
Vogel, Irene
2020. Fixed stress as phonological redundancy. In Approaches to Hungarian [Approaches to Hungarian, 16], ► pp. 187 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 december 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue