In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXVI: Papers from the annual symposium on Arabic Linguistics. New York, 2012
Edited by Reem Khamis and Karen Froud
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 2] 2014
► pp. 135–160
Cyclic AGREE derives restrictions on cliticization in classical Arabic
Published online: 30 October 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.2.09wal
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.2.09wal
Person based restrictions on clitic combinations serve as testing grounds for theories of syntactic locality and the means of avoiding them as windows into last resort mechanisms. Clitic restrictions in the verbal domain in Classical Arabic can be derived by Cyclic AGREE, rather than (defective) intervention. This offers a unified, syntactic analysis of the ultrastrong Person Case Constraint and restrictions on combinations of third person clitics. The alternative structures used when cliticization is blocked are the PF realization of independently established syntactic relations, not a last resort mechanism. Several properties of person restrictions are shown to follow from the causative structure of double object verbs in Classical Arabic.
References (45)
Adger, D., & Harbour, D. (2007). The syntax and syncretisms of the person case constraint. Syntax, 10, 2–37.
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2003). The syntax of ditransitives: Evidence from clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. (2005). Strong and weak person restrictions: A feature checking analysis. In L. Heggie, & F. Ordóñez (Eds.), Clitic and affix combinations (pp. 199–235). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Béjar, S. (2003). Phi-syntax: A theory of agreement. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
Béjar, S., & ezáč, M. (2003). Person licensing and the derivation of PCC effects. In A.T. Pérez-Leroux, & Y. Roberge (Eds.), Romance linguistics: Theory and acquisition (pp. 49–61). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bobaljik, J.D. (2008). Where’s phi? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Béjar (Eds.), Phi-theory: Phi features across interfaces and modules (pp. 295–328). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
. (1994). The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. In H. Harley, & C. Phillips (Eds.), The morphology-syntax connection, number 22 in MIT working papers in linguistics (pp. 33–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cardinaletti, A., & Starke, M. (1999). The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of the three classes of pronouns. In H. van Riemsdijk (Ed.), Clitics in the languages of Europe (pp. 145–233). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagareka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
. (2001). Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 1–52). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
de Sacy, A.I.S. (1905). Grammaire arabe (Vol. 2, 3rd edn). Société anonyme de l’imprimerie rapide, Tunis, (first edition 1810).
Fassi Fehri, A. (1988). Agreement in Arabic, binding and coherence. In M. Barlow, & C.A. Ferguson (eds.), Agreement in natural language: Approaches, theories, descriptions (pp. 107–158). Stanford, CT: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Halle, M., and Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale, & S. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Harley, H. & Ritter, E. (2002). Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language, 78(3), 482–526.
Howell, M.S. (1880). A grammar of the classical Arabic language in four parts. Allahabad: North-Western Provinces and Oudh Government Press.
Marantz, A. (1991). Case and licensing. In G. Westphal, B. Ao, & H.-R. Chae (Eds.), Proceedings of ESCOL ’91 (pp. 234–253). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Club.
McFadden, T. (2004). The position of morphological case in the derivation: A study on the syntax-morphology interface. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Nevins, A. (2007). The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 273–313.
Ormazabal, J. & Romero, J. (2007). The object agreement constraint. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 25, 315–347.
Perlmutter, D.M. (1971). Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Pesetsky, D. (2012). Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Unpublished manuscript, MIT.
Postal, P.M. (1990). French indirect object demotion. In P. M.Postal, & B.D. Joseph (Eds.), Studies in relational grammar 3 (pp. 104–200). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Preminger, O. (2010). Failure to agree is not a failure: φ -Agreement with post-verbal subjects in Hebrew. In J. van Craenenbroeck, & J. Rooryck (Eds.), Linguistic variation yearbook (Vol. 9, pp. 241–278). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2011b). Asymmetries between person and number in syntax: A commentary on Baker’s SCOPA. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 29, 917–937.
Pylkkänen, L. (2002). Introducing arguments. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
. (2007). Escaping the person case constraint: Reference-set computation in the φ -system. Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 6, 97–138.
. (2008). The syntax of eccentric agreement: The person case constraint and ansolutive displacement in Basque. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 26, 61–106.
Sibawayh, A. i. U. (1881). Le Livre de Ŝıbawaihi, traité Arabe, Volume 1. Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.
van Craenenbroeck, J., & van Koppen, M. (2002). The locality of agreement and the CP-domain. Handout, GLOW 25, April 9–11, 2002.
Walkow, M. (2011). Person effects and the representation of third person: an argument from Barcelońı Catalan. In J. Berns, H. Jacobs, & T. Scheer (Eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’ Nice 2009 (pp. 343–361). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. (2012a). Goals, big and small. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
. (2012b). The syntax of the person case constraint drives morphological impoverishment of clitics. In J. Choi, E.A. Hogue, J. Punske, D. Tat, J. Schertz, & A. Trueman (Eds.), Proceedings of the poster session of 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume 20 of Coyote Papers: Working Papers in Linguistics. Phoenix, AZ: University of Arizona Linguistics Circle.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 january 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
