Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXV: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Washington, D.C., 2022
Edited by Ahmad Al-Qassas
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 14] 2025
► pp. 180–200

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
On the additive focus particle kamaan in Hijazi Arabic

 | The University of Manchester | Taibah University
Published online: 3 March 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.14.08ala
Abstract
This paper explores the semantic properties of the Hijazi Arabic focus particle kamaan. The paper presents original new data of kamaan on four possible interpretations of the particle; an additive interpretation that may translate to English also, a scalar interpretation that may translate to even, a repetitive interpretation that may translate to again, and a quantity-related interpretation that may translate to more. The paper argues that the different interpretations do not result from a case of lexical ambiguity, but rather a uniform analysis for kamaan is possible, under which kamaan is always an additive focus particle.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
    • The puzzle
    • Methodological remarks
    • Structure of the paper
  • 2.Background
    • Focus-marking in Hijazi Arabic
    • The semantics of focus
    • Focus-marking
    • Context dependency
    • Focus-sensitive operators
  • 3.kamaan: An additive focus particle
    • Remarks about the syntax of Kamaan
    • Focus sensitivity
    • The additive presupposition
  • 4.The different interpretations of kamaan
    • The scalar interpretation of Kamaan
    • The repetitive interpretation of Kamaan
    • The quantity-related interpretation
  • 5.A uniform analysis for kamaan
  • 6.Conclusion and outlook
  • Notes
  • References
References (20)
References
Alahmadi, S. (2023). A unified semantics for KAMAN in Hijazi Arabic. In Proceedings of the 9th TripleA workshop for semantic fieldworkers & 29th annual meeting of the Austronesian Formal Linguistics Association (TripleAFLA) (pp.1–16). London, ON: University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alzaidi, M. (2014). Information structure and intonation in Hijazi Arabic. Ph.D. diss., University of Essex at Colchester.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alzaidi, M., Xu, Y., & Xu, A. (2019). Prosodic encoding of focus in Hijazi Arabic. Speech Communication, 106, 127–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, D. & Clark, B. (2008). Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, S. (2006). Focus on again. Linguistics & Philosophy, 29(3), 277–314. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Focus-sensitive operators. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 227–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2000). Meaning and grammar: An introduction to semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, M. (2020). The many functions of Cuzco Quechua =pas: Implications for the semantic map of additivity. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 5(1), 34. 1–36.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Féry, C. (2009). Postponed auch: Where does its accent come from. Snippets, 20, 23–27.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hohaus, V. & Bowler, M. (2022). Crosslinguistic formal pragmatics. In Y. Miyamoto, M. Koizumi, H. Ono, & U. Sauerland (Eds.), Key concepts of experimental pragmatics (pp. 120–159). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Howell, A., Hohaus, V., Berezovskaya, P., Sachs, K., Braun, J., Durmaz, Ş., & Beck, S. (2022). (No) Variation in the grammar of alternatives. Linguistic Variation, 22(1), 1–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kadmon, N. (2001). Formal pragmatics: Semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karttunen, L. (1973). Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(2), 169–193.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthewson, L. (2004). On the methodology of semantic fieldwork. International Journal of American Linguistics, 70(4), 369–451. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011). Methods in crosslinguistic formal semantics. In C. Maienborn, K. von Heusinger & P. H. Portner (Eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, Volume 1 (pp. 268–284). Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Ph.D. diss., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1992). A Theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Alternative semantics. In C. Féry & S. Ishihara (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of information structure (pp. 19–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. A. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory (pp. 550–569). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Prosody, focus, and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue