Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXV: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Washington, D.C., 2022
Edited by Ahmad Al-Qassas
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 14] 2025
► pp. 137–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Doubling unconditionals in Arabic

 | Charles University
 | Charles University
 | LLING/Nantes Université | LUCL/Leiden University
Published online: 3 March 2025
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.14.06sim
Abstract
We discuss wh-based unconditionals in Arabic (‘wherever she went, she was followed by photographers’), with special attention paid to the so-called doubling unconditionals in whose antecedents the predicate/clause is reduplicated (lit. ‘wher(ever) she went she went, she was followed by photographers’). We propose that the doubling unconditionals can be treated on a par with canonical unconditionals once one recognizes that the wh-introduced structure within the antecedent (‘wher(ever) she went’) is a focused free relative. We discuss the benefits, problems, and various open issues of this analysis. The paper constitutes the first in-depth discussion of the syntax and semantics of wh-based unconditionals in Arabic, drawing evidence primarily from Syrian Arabic.
Article outline
  • 2.Introduction
  • 3.Background on unconditionals
  • 4.Analysis
  • 5.Supporting evidence
    • Free relatives in Arabic
    • Contrastive focus on the free relative
    • TAM-restrictions in doubling unconditionals
  • 6.Problems and open issues
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
References (43)
References
Alazzawie, A. (2019). On topic and focus in Standard Arabic. Heliyon, 5(8), e02190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Al-Horais, N. (2017). On negation and focus in Standard Arabic: Interface-based approach. Journal of Universal Language, 18(1), 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aloni, M. (2007). Free choice and exhaustification: An account of subtrigging effects. In E. Puig-Waldmüller (Ed.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 11 (pp. 16–30). Barcelona: Pompeu Fabra University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butler, J. (2004). Phase structure, phrase structure, and quantification. Doctoral disseration, University of York.
Caponigro, I. (2021). Introducing headless relative clauses and the findings from Mesoamerican languages. In I. Caponigro, H. Torrence, & R. Z. Maldonado (Eds.), Headless relative clauses in Mesoamerican languages (pp. 1–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chierchia, G. (2013). Logic in grammar: Polarity, free choice, and intervention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalism in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Comrie, B. (1986). Conditionals: A typology. In E. C. Traugott, A. ter Meulen, J. S. Reilly, & C. A. Furguson (Eds.), On Conditionals (pp. 77–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1998). Rethinking the typology of relative clauses. Language Design, 1, 59–85. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dayal, V. (1997). Free relatives and ever: Identity and free choice readings. In A. Lawson (Ed.), SALT 7: Proceedings from the 7th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 99–116). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
El Zarka, D. (2013). On the interaction of information structure and prosody: The case of Egyptian Arabic. Habilitation thesis, University of Graz. [URL]
(2017). Arabic intonation. In Oxford handbooks online (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fӑlӑuş, A. & Nicolae, A. (2022). Additive free choice items in unconditionals. Natural Language Semantics, 30(2), 185–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fassi Fehri, Abdelkader. (1993). Issues in the structure of Arabic clauses and words. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, K. (2000). Whatever. In B. Jackson & T. Matthews (Eds.), SALT 10: Proceedings from the 10th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 27–39). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Gullì, A. (2003). Phrasal reduplication in syntax. Doctoral disseration, New York University.
Haegeman, L. (2003). Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind & Language, 18(4), 317–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagstrom, P. (1998). Decomposing questions. Doctoral disseration, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [URL]
Hamblin, C. L. (1973). Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language, 10(1), 41–53. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hewitt, S. (2006). Arabic: Verb–subject–object or verb–given–new? Implications for word order typology. In Conference on Communication and Information Structure in Spoken Arabic. College Park, MD: Center for Advanced Study of Language.
Horvath, J. (2010). “Discourse features”, syntactic displacement, and the status of contrast. Lingua, 120(6), 1346–1369. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacobson, P. (1995). On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer & B. Partee (ed.), Quantification in natural languages, Vol II (pp. 451–486). Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karawani, H. (2014). The real, the fake, and the fake fake in counterfactual conditionals, crosslinguistically. Doctoral disseration, University of Amsterdam. [URL]
Kratzer, A. & Shimoyama, J. (2002). Indeterminate pronouns: The view from Japanese. In Y. Otsu (Ed.), Proceedings of the Third Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics (pp. 1–25). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
Kratzer, A. (2012). Modals and conditionals: New and revised perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1984). Der Relativsatz. Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ouhalla, J. (1994). Focus in Standard Arabic. Linguistics in Potsdam, 1, 65–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Remarks on focus in Standard Arabic. In M. Eid & R. R. Radcliffe (Eds.), Perspectives on Arabic linguistics X: Papers from the 10th Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics (pp. 9–45). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pancheva Izvorski, R. (2000). Free relatives and related matters. Doctoral disseration, University of Pennsylvania. [URL]
Quer, J. (1998). Mood at the interface. Doctoral disseration, Utrecht University.
Rawlins, K. (2013). (Un)conditionals. Natural Language Semantics, 40(2), 111–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Doctoral disseration, University of Massachusetts. [URL]
(1992). A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1), 75–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sadler, L. & Camilleri, M. (2018). Free relatives in Maltese. Brill's Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics, 10(1), 115–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Šimík, R. (2020). Doubling unconditionals and relative sluicing. Natural Language Semantics, 28(1), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). Free relatives. In D. Gutzmann, L. Matthewson, C. Meier, H. Rullmann, & T. E. Zimmermann (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to semantics, Vol. 2 (pp. 1033–1070). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Soltan, U. (2019). On two types of correlation structures in Egyptian Arabic. In R. Stockwell, M. O'Leary, Z. Xu, & Z. L. Zhou (Eds.), WCCFL 36: Proceedings of the 36th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 316–325). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project. [URL]
Srire, M. (2023). Unconditionals, Correlatives and Relatives in Libyan Arabic. Bachelor thesis, Charles University.
Sulaiman, M. (2016). The syntax of wh-questions in Syrian Arabic. Doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yanovich, I. (2005). Choice-functional series of indefinites and Hamblin semantics. In E. Georgala & J. Howell (Eds.), SALT 15: Proceedings from the 15th Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory (pp. 309–326). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
Zaefferer, D. (1990). Conditionals and unconditionals in universal grammar and situation semantics. In R. Cooper, K. Mukai, & J. Perry (Eds.), Situation theory and its applications I (pp. 471–492). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeijlstra, H. (2004). Sentential negation and negative concord. Doctoral disseration, University of Amsterdam. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue