In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXV: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Washington, D.C., 2022
Edited by Ahmad Al-Qassas
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 14] 2025
► pp. 80–107
Chapter 4Neutralization of voice in colloquial Arabic verbs
Published online: 3 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.14.04pos
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.14.04pos
Abstract
In this paper I propose the concept of neutralization of voice, motivated by certain cases of
intransitive usage of transitive verbs in some Arabic varieties and defined as the omission of coding of a de-transitivizing
valency alternation. I confront the concept with a sample of Arabic verbs
and argue that a class of constructions in a range of Arabic varieties can indeed be accounted for in terms of voice neutralization. I also suggest some factors licensing the phenomenon
and discuss its possible implications for cross-varietal and typological comparison, as well as its validity in terms
of the study of actual language use, including marginal and emergent constructions conditioned by context.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Transitivity alternations and their coding
- Introducing the phenomenon
- The notion of voice neutralization
- 1.Pilot study on the Egyptian usage of ʾibil ‘accept’ and ʾaddim ‘submit’
- 2.Heuristic search for voice-neutralizing verbs
- 3.Description and analysis
- 3.1The “standard” alternative
- 3.2Morphology: The derivational status of the verb
- 3.3Semantics: The type of alternation neutralized
- a.The passive alternation
- b.The reflexive alternation
- c.The IO-passive/reflexive alternation
- 3.4Pragmatics: The degree of conventionalization
- Scale of stability/conventionalization of the neutralized pattern
- 3.5Neutralization of voice observed in the data
- 4.Discussion and open issues
- 4.1Factors licensing voice neutralization
- a.Morphological limitations
- b.The absence of object
- c.The contextual frame and agentivity of the undergoer
- d.Unmarked reflexive or antipassive?
- e.Stylistic and pragmatic aspects (communicative efficiency)
- 4.2The relevance of voice neutralization as a notion
- 4.3The inclusion of IO-passive alternation
- 4.4Alternative approaches to the IO-passive alternation
- 4.5Periphrasis by means of ʕamal ‘do’
- 4.6Cross-varietal diversity and comparison
- 4.7Typological and diachronic implications
- 4.1Factors licensing voice neutralization
- 5.Conclusion
Acknowledgments Notes References
References (22)
Alvarez, González Albert & Navarro Í. (2017). Verb
Valency Changes: Theoretical and Typological
Perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Badawi, E., Hinds, M. (1986). A
Dictionary of Egyptian Arabic:
Arabic-English. Beirut: Librairie du Liban.
Bielický, V. & Smrž, O. (2008). Building
the Valency Lexicon of Arabic
Verbs. In Proceedings of the Sixth International
Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'08), Marrakech,
Morocco. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Brustad, Kristen. (2000). The
Syntax of Spoken Arabic: A Comparative Study of Moroccan, Egyptian, Syrian, and Kuwaiti
Dialects.
Comrie, B. & Polinsky, M. (Eds). (1993). Causatives
and transitivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dixon, R. M. W. & Aikhenvald, A. (2002). Changing
Valency: Case Studies in
Transitivity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
El-Ayoubi, H., Fischer, W. & Langer, M. (2010). Syntax der arabischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Teil II: Die
Verbalgruppe. Wiesbaden: Reichert.
Enfield, N. J. (2014). Natural
causes of language. Frames, biases, and cultural transmission. (Conceptual
Foundations of Language Science
1). Berlin: Language Science Press.
Gil, David. (2008). How
Much Grammar Does It Take to Sail a Boat? (Or, What Can Material Artefacts Tell Us About the Evolution of
Language?). In Andrew D. M. Smith, Kenny Smith & Ramon Ferrer i. Cancho (Ed.), The
Evolution of
Language (pp. 123–130). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Hartmann, I. & Haspelmath, M. & Taylor, B. (Eds.), (2013). Valency Patterns
Leipzig. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL]. (Accessed 2022-09-05.)
Haspelmath, M. (1993). More
on the typology of inchoative/causative verb
alternations. In B. Comrie & P. Polinski (Eds.), Causatives
and
transitivity. (pp. 87–111). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2021). Valency
and voice constructions. Unpublished draft. Version
from August (2022). [URL]. (Accessed 2022-09-05.)
Haspelmath, M., Calude A., Spagnol M., Narrog H. & Bamyaci E. (2014). Coding
Causal–Noncausal Verb Alternations: A Form–Frequency Correspondence
Explanation. Journal of
Linguistics, 50(3), 587–625.
Kász, C. (2015). 11.
Valency properties of verbs in Modern Standard
Arabic. In A. Malchukov & B. Comrie (Ed.), Volume
1 Introducing the Framework, and Case Studies from Africa and
Eurasia (pp. 327–364). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Letuchiy, Alexander. (2017). Arabic
‘labile verbs’ in form III: Theoretical and typological perspectives. .
Mel’čuk, Igor. (1993) The
inflectional category of voice: towards a more rigorous
definition. In B. Comrie & M. Polinsky (Eds). Causatives
and
transitivity. (pp. 1–46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Retsö, Jan. (1983). The
Finite Passive voice in modern Arabic dialects. Orienthalia
Gothoburgensia, 7. Götheborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
Shibatani, M. (1985). Passives
and Related Constructions: A Prototype
Analysis. Language, 61(4), 821–848.
(Ed.), (1988). Passive
and Voice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
