Cover not available

In:Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXXIV: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Tucson, Arizona, 2020
Edited by Mahmoud Azaz
[Studies in Arabic Linguistics 12] 2023
► pp. 79–102

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Are Arabic listeners “stress deaf” to their own L2 pronunciation?

 | Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University
 | University of Delaware
Published online: 6 January 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/sal.12.04alb
Abstract
This study investigates to what extent Arabic speakers, whose L1 has predictable lexical stress, are “stress deaf” and whether their L1 prosodic properties influence their L2 stress perception. Arabic L2 English speakers and L1 English speakers performed an identification task with English nonce words produced by English and Arabic speakers. The results reveal that the Arabic speakers had more difficulty than the English speakers in identifying stress regardless of whether the words were produced by Arabic or English speakers, confirming their stress deafness in general. The Arabic speakers, nevertheless, exhibited greater sensitivity to stress produced by other Arabic speakers, especially in the position expected for Arabic, indicating further the effect of L1 prosodic properties on their perception of L2 stress.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Perception of L2 stress and L1 prosodic properties
    • 2.1The role of L1 in L2 stress perception
    • 2.2Prosodic properties of stress in English and Arabic
      • 2.2.1English
      • 2.2.2Arabic
  • 3.The present study
    • 3.1Experimental investigation of the perception of English stress by Arabic speakers
    • 3.2Participants
    • 3.3Stimuli: Structure
    • 3.4Stimuli: Recording
    • 3.5Stimuli: Selection
    • 3.6Stimuli: Acoustic properties
    • 3.7Perception task procedure
    • 3.8Data analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (54)
References
Al Amro, M. (2019). Word stress in Saudi Najd Arabic. American International Journal of Social Science, 8(3). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Algahtani, M. (2014). Syllable structure and related processes in optimality theory: An Examination Of Najdi Arabic. Unpublished PhD thesis. Newcastle University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alhammad, R. (2019). The syllabification system and stress pattern of Najd Arabic. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(6). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Almbark, R. (2012). The perception and production of SSBE vowels by Syrian Arabic learners: The foreign language model (Doctoral dissertation, University of York).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, H. (2006). The perception and production of second language stress: A cross-linguistic experimental study University of Delaware.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altmann, H., & Vogel, I. (2002). L2 acquisition of stress: The role of L1. Paper presented at the DGfS Annual Meeting “Multilingualism Today” in Mannheim, Germany.
Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique, 37(3), 301–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Language learnability and L2 phonology: The acquisition of metrical parameters. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. The Acquisition of English Stress by Speakers of Nonaccentual Languages: Lexical Storage Versus Computation of Stress. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beckman, M. E. (1986). Stress and non-stress accent Walter de Gruyter. Dordrecht: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bond, Z. (1999). Slips of the ear: Errors in the perception of casual conversation Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braun, B., Lemhöfer, K., & Mani, N. (2011). Perceiving unstressed vowels in foreign-accented English Acoustical Society of America. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chahal, D. (2003). Phonetic cues to prominence in Lebanese Arabic. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Barcelona, 2067–2070.
Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(4), 1468–1479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Connell, K., Hüls, S., Martínez-García, M. T., Qin, Z., Shin, S., Yan, H., & Tremblay, A. (2018). English learners’ use of segmental and suprasegmental cues to stress in lexical access: An Eye-Tracking study. Language Learning, 68(3), 635–668. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutler, A., Wales, R., Cooper, N., & Janssen, J. (2007). Dutch listeners’ use of suprasegmental cues to English stress. Paper presented at the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 2007), 1913–1916.
Cutler, A., & Otake, T. (1994). Mora or phoneme? Further evidence for language-specific listening. Journal of Memory and Language 33(6): 824–844. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Jong, K., & Zawaydeh, B. A. (1999). Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics, 27(1), 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domahs, U., Genc, S., Knaus, J., Wiese, R., & Kabak, B. (2013). Processing (un-) predictable word stress: ERP evidence from Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(3), 335–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domahs, U., Knaus, J. A., El Shanawany, H., & Wiese, R. (2014). The role of predictability and structure in word stress processing: An ERP study on Cairene Arabic and a cross-linguistic comparison. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastian, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in french? Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness” Acoustical Society of America. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress ‘deafness’: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106(2), 682–706. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, A. (2000). Prosodic features and prosodic structure: The phonology of suprasegmentals. Oxford University Press; New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (2002). Selective attention and the acquisition of new phonetic categories. American Psychological Association. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friederici, A. D., Friedrich, M., & Christophe, A. (2007). Brain responses in 4-month-old infants are already language specific. Current Biology, 17(14), 1208–1211. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1(2), 126–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gay, T. (1978). Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63(1), 223–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English nonwords include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46(4), 403–426. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, C. (2004). The Phonology of Tone and Intonation. Cambridge: University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, B. (1995). Metrical stress theory: Principles and case studies. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, L. (1985). A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. (2006). Word-prosodic typology. Phonology, 23(2), 225–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). How (not) to do phonological typology: The case of pitch-accent. Language Sciences, 31(2–3), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ingvalson, E. M., Holt, L. L., & McClelland, J. L. (2012). Can native japanese listeners learn to differentiate/r–l/on the basis of F3 onset frequency? Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P. K., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kager, R. (2007). Feet and metrical stress. The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, 195–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kijak, A. M. (2009). How stressful is L2 stress? A cross-linguistic study of L2 perception and production of metrical systems Lot.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2014). A course in phonetics Nelson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. I. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mitleb, F. (1981). Timing of English vowels spoken with an Arabic accent. Research in Phonetics, 2, 193–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 39–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nguyễn, T. A., Ingram, C. J., & Pensalfini, J. R. (2008). Prosodic transfer in Vietnamese acquisition of English contrastive stress patterns. Journal of Phonetics, 36(1), 158–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ou, S. (2010). Taiwanese EFL learners’ perception of English word stress. Concentric: Studies in Linguistics, 36(1), 1–23.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pater, J. (1997). Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. Language Acquisition and Language Disorders, 16, 235–262.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress ‘deafness’. Laboratory phonology, 7(2000), 203–240.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3), 422–430. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Heuven, V. J. (2019). 1 acoustic correlates and perceptual cues of word and sentence stress. The Study of Word Stress and Accent: Theories, Methods and Data, 15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vogel, I., Athanasopoulou, A., & Pincus, N. (2017). Acoustic properties of prominence and foot structure in Arabic. Paper presented at the Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XXIX: Papers from the Annual Symposium on Arabic Linguistics, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2015, 5 55.
Wang, Q. (2008). Perception of English stress by mandarin Chinese learners of English: An acoustic study. PhD Dissertation, University of Victoria.
Watson, J. C. (2011a). Word stress in arabic. The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Youssef, A., & Mazurkewich, I. (1998). The acquisition of English metrical parameters and syllable structure by adult native speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene dialect). The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 317–346) Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics 38(2), 260–271.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zuraiq, W., & Sereno, J. A. (2007). English lexical stress cues in native English and non-native Arabic speakers. Ratio, 1(2), 829–832.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue