Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 6:2 (2024) ► pp.99–127
And tonight, shocking revelations about TV news broadcasts
A hybrid spoken/written register, or a unique register?
Published online: 24 February 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.24005.bib
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.24005.bib
Abstract
TV news broadcasts (TVNBs) represent an unusual mix of
oral/literate situational characteristics. In addition, TVNBs have shifted
historically to become increasingly focused on ‘soft’ human-interest stories.
Thus, we have good reason to predict that present-day TVNBs will incorporate a
hybrid blend of oral and literate lexico-grammatical characteristics.
The present study explores this possibility through a
corpus-based analysis of TVNBs compared to conversation and newspaper writing.
In part, the results confirm these prior expectations. Surprisingly, though, a
more detailed analysis shows that this mixture of situational characteristics
has given rise to a unique grammatical style of discourse rather than a hybrid
style. In particular, TVNBs can be analyzed to a large extent as main clauses
where the finite verb has been deleted. This discourse style is interesting
because it cannot be attributed to challenging production circumstances. Rather,
the functional motivation seems related to creating a perception of urgency and
excitement.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Background: Situational/communicative characteristics of Television News Broadcasts (TVNBs)
- 3.Methods
- 4.Quantitative-linguistic analysis of TV News Broadcasts
- 5.Non-Canonical Reduced Structures in TVNBs: The rest of the story
- 6.Discussion: Functional motivations of the unique grammatical characteristics of TVNBs
- Notes
References
References (33)
Arbaoui, B., De Swert, K. & van der Brug, W. (2020). Sensationalism
in news coverage: A comparative study in 14 television
systems. Communication
Research, 47(2), 299–320.
(1992). On
the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional
analysis. Discourse
Processes, 151, 133–163.
(2006). University
language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written
registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2009). Are
there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of
language use in speech and
writing. In David R. Olson & Nancy Torrance (Eds.), Cambridge
handbook of
literacy, (pp. 75–91). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2014). Using
multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of
register variation. Languages in
Contrast, 14(1).7–34.
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift
and the evolution of English style: A history of three
genres. Language, 651, 487–517.
(2001). Diachronic
relations among speech-based and written registers in
English. In S. Conrad and D. Biber (Eds.), Variation
in English: Multi-Dimensional
studies, (pp. 66–83). London: Longman.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical
complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in
writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S. & Egbert, J. (2022). The
Register-Functional approach to grammatical complexity: Theoretical
foundation, descriptive research findings,
applications. New York: Routledge.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (2021). Grammar
of spoken and written
English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Biber, D., & Vásquez, C. (2008). Writing
and
speaking. In C. Bazerman (Eds.), Handbook
of research on
writing (pp. 535–548). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Biber, D., Larsson, T. & Hancock, G. R. (2024). Dimensions
of text complexity in the spoken and written modes: A comparison of
theory-based models. Journal of English
Linguistics, 521.
Biber, D., Wizner, S. & Reppen, R. (Forthcoming). The
President wide awake at 3:14 AM tweeting about CNN:
Informational non-canonical reduced structures in TV news
broadcasts. In S. Leuckert and T. Pham (Eds.), Non-Canonical
English syntax: concepts, methods, and
approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruthiaux, P. (1996). The
discourse of classified advertising: Exploring the nature of linguistic
simplicity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2023). Key
feature analysis — A simple, yet powerful method for comparing text
varieties. Corpora, 18(1), 121–133.
Ferguson, C. A. (1982). Simplified
registers and linguistic
theory. In L. Obler & L. Menn, eds., Exceptional
language and linguistics. New York: Academic Press, 49–66.
(1983). Sports
announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register
variation. Language in
Society 121, 153–72.
Glogger, I. (2019). Soft
spot for soft news? Influences of journalistic role conceptions on hard and
soft news coverage. Journalism
Studies, 201, 2293–2311.
Grabe, M. E., Zhou, S. & Barnett, B. (2001). Explicating
sensationalism in television news: content and the bells and whistles of
form. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic
Media, 451, 635–655.
Hutchby, I. (2003). Conversation
analysis and the study of broadcast
talk. In R. Sanders & K. Fitch (Eds.), Handbook
of language and social
interaction, (pp. 437–460). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kleemans, M., & Vettehen, P. H. (2009). Sensationalism
in television news: A
review. In R. P. Konig, P. W. M. Nelissen, & F. J. M. Huysmans (Eds.), Meaningful
media: Communication research on the social construction of
reality (pp. 226–243). Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Tandem Felix.
Larsson, T., Biber, D., & Hancock, G. R. (in
press). On the role of cumulative knowledge
building and specific hypotheses: The case of grammatical
complexity. Corpora, 19(3).
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change
in contemporary English: A grammatical
study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Otto, L., Glogger, I. & Boukes, M. (2017). The
softening of journalistic political communication: A comprehensive framework
model of sensationalism, soft news, infotainment, and
tabloidization. Communication
Theory, 271, 136–155.