Cover not available

Article published In: Register and social media
Edited by Isobelle Clarke and Jack Grieve
[Register Studies 4:2] 2022
► pp. 263–287

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Do registers have different functions for text length?

A case study of Reddit

ORCiD logo with link | University of Helsinki
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.22007.lii
Abstract
Similar to lexical and grammatical choices, the length of a text is also guided by situational constraints and functional needs. Consequently, texts of different lengths are associated with different communicative functions. This study explores the role of register in the functions which are associated with comment lengths on the social media platform Reddit. Since registers differ in their functional and situational makeup, the same text length may also have different functions in different registers. By analyzing variation in the frequencies of register features across comment lengths in a number of popular subreddits in a large-scale dataset of Reddit comments, I show that the functional associations of text length can differ greatly between subreddits, and that comments of the same length can even have virtually opposite functions in different subreddits. Furthermore, some subregisters are clearly differentiated not only by their feature makeup but also by the length of their comments.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Data and Methods
    • 2.1Data
    • 3.2Methods
      • 2.2.1Text-linguistic register framework
      • 2.2.2Lengthwise analysis
  • 3.Analysis
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Baumgartner, J., Zannettou, S., Keegan, B., Squire, M., & Blackburn, J. (2020). The Pushshift Reddit Dataset. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 14(1), 830–839. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berber Sardinha, T., & Veirano Pinto, M. (2014). Multi-dimensional analysis, 25 years on: A tribute to Douglas Biber. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1994). An analytical framework for register studies. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 31–56). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Introduction: Multi-dimensional analysis and the study of register variation. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 3–12). Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Csomay, E., Jones, J. K., & Keck, C. (2004). A corpus linguistic investigation of vocabulary-based discourse units in university registers. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (Eds.), Applied Corpus Linguistics: A Multidimensional Perspective (pp. 53–72). Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(2), 95–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M. (2015). Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10(1), 11–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D. (2020). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 16(3), 581–616. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. The Journal of English Linguistics, 411, 104–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Kurjian, J. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of web registers and text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In M. Hundt, N. Nesselhauf, & C. Biewer (Eds.), Corpus linguistics and the web (pp. 109–132). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2017). Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Z. Waseem, W. Hui Kyong, D. Hovy, & J. Tetreault (Eds.), Proceedings of the first workshop on abusive language online (pp. 1–10). Vancouver: Association for Computational Linguistics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). Stylistic variation on the Donald Trump Twitter account: A linguistic analysis of tweets posted between 2009 and 2018. PLoS ONE, 14(9). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (Eds.). (2001). Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010). Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type-token ratio (MATTR). Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 17(2), 94–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. (2015). Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(9), 1817–1831. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, E. (Ed.) (2013). Twenty-five ears of Biber’s multi-dimensional analysis [Special issue]. Corpora, 8(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grieve, J., Biber, D., Friginal, E., & Nekrasova, T. (2011). Variation among blog text types: A multi-dimensional analysis. In A. Mehler, S. Sharoff, & M. Santini (Eds.), Genres on the web: Corpus studies and computational models (pp. 302–322). New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, C. W., Haug, H. T., & Landry, R. G. (1989). The reliability of type-token ratios for the oral language of school age children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 321, 536–540. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hess, C. W., Sefton, K. M., & Landry, R. G. (1986). Sample size and type-token ratios for oral language of preschool children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 291, 129–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubát, M., & Milička, J. (2013). Vocabulary richness measure in genres. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 20(4), 339–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Using lengthwise scaling to compare feature frequencies across text lengths on Reddit. In S. Rüdiger & D. Dayter (Eds.), Corpus approaches to social media (pp. 111–130). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, C. D., Surdeanu, M., Bauer, J., Finkel, J., Bethard, S. J., & McClosky, D. (2014). The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (pp. 55–60). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shi, Y., & Lei, L. (2020). Lexical richness and text length: An entropy-based perspective. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics, 29(1), 62–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Titak, A., & Roberson, A. (2013). Dimensions of web registers: An exploratory multi-dimensional comparison. Corpora, 8(2), 239–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Erten-Johansson, Selcen & Veronika Laippala
2025. 33Utilizing Text Dispersion Keyness on Turkish web registers: The case of Informational Description and Opinion. In Exploring digitally-mediated communication with corpora, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Messerli, Thomas C, Daria Dayter, Sven Leuckert, Aatu Liimatta, Hanna Mahler, Axel Bohmann, Gustavo Kozma & Rafaela Tosin
2025. Digital debating cultures: communicative practices on Reddit. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 40:1 ► pp. 227 ff. DOI logo
Erten-Johansson, Selcen, Valtteri Skantsi, Sampo Pyysalo & Veronika Laippala
2024. Linguistic variation beyond the Indo-European web. Register Studies 6:1 ► pp. 60 ff. DOI logo
Hiltunen, Turo
2024. Early newspapers as data for corpus linguistics (and Digital Humanities). In Challenges in corpus linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 118], ► pp. 68 ff. DOI logo
Liimatta, Aatu
2024. Text length and short texts. In Challenges in corpus linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 118], ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue