Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp.115–143
Register variation in L1 and L2 student writing
A multidimensional analysis
Published online: 3 June 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20012.gou
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20012.gou
Abstract
While there have been many studies describing L2 academic writing, most of these studies have used corpora of
first year or assessment writing (Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 166–178. ; Weigle & Friginal 2014). The
present study seeks to describe linguistic variation in L2 writing for content classes and to compare these linguistic patterns to
those found in L1 writing. A multi-dimensional (MD) analysis was conducted in two corpora, BAWE and BrAWE, extracting five
dimensions. The L2 corpus contained 379 texts written by Brazilian students doing part of their undergrad in the UK and the L1
corpus contained 395 texts from BAWE. The results of this study indicate that L1 and L2 writers use similar linguistic resources
to convey the purpose of university registers, with the exception of case studies, designs, exercises and research reports. This
linguistic variation between L1 and L2 writers might be explained by students’ interpretation of these registers’ communicative
purposes.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Multi-dimensional analyses of university student writing
- 3.Corpora used in the study
- 4.Multi-dimensional analysis
- 5.Results and discussion
- 5.1Linguistic features in the university writing dimensions
- 5.2Dimension 1: Expression of personal opinion vs compressed procedural information
- 5.3Dimension 2: Expression of possibility vs account of completed actions
- 5.4Dimension 3: Informational density vs engaging presentation
- 5.5Dimension 4: Involved academic narrative vs elaborate description
- 5.6Dimension 5: Stance towards the work of others
- 6.Conclusion
- Note
References
References (16)
Alsop, S., & Nesi, H. (2009). Issues in the development of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) corpus. Corpora, 4(1), 71–83.
(1992). On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis. Discourse Processes, 15(2), 133–163.
(2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers (Vol. 231). John Benjamins Publishing.
Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 166–178.
Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 261, 80–95.
Gardner, S., & Nesi, H. (2013). A classification of genre families in university student writing. Applied linguistics, 34(1), 25–52.
Gardner, S., Nesi, H., & Biber, D. (2019). Discipline, level, genre: Integrating situational perspectives in a new MD analysis of university student writing. Applied Linguistics, 40 (4), 646–674.
Goulart, L. (2017). Compilation of a Brazilian academic written English corpus. Revista e-scrita: Revista do Curso de Letras da UNIABEU, 8(2), 32–47.
Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Hardy, J. A., & Friginal, E. (2016). Genre variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 221, 119–131.
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge University Press.
Pan, F. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of L1–L2 differences across three advanced levels. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 36(2), 117–131.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Ansarifar, Ahmad, Hesamoddin Shahriari, Shelley Staples & Mohammad Ghazanfari
Goulart, Larissa & Tülay Dixon
2025. The relative influence of language backgrounds, communicative text types, and disciplines in undergraduate student
writing. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 11:1 ► pp. 178 ff.
Smirnova, Elizaveta
Wu, Kan & Defeng Li
Xu, Qin, Tomoji Tabata & Yu Zhu
Zhao, Xinyu, William J. Crawford & Hua Chen
Goulart, Larissa
Özkan Miller, Vildan & Tove Larsson
2024. The effect of linguistic and extralinguistic features on EFL adverb placement. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 338 ff.
Zhang, Yujiao
Candarli, Duygu
Larsson, Tove, Randi Reppen & Tülay Dixon
Staples, Shelley & Karin Puga
2022. Integrating fluency and prosody into multidimensional analysis. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:2 ► pp. 190 ff.
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
