Cover not available

Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 3:1 (2021) ► pp.33–87

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Diachronic register change

A corpus-based study of Australian English, with comparisons across British and American English

ORCiD logo with link | University of NSW
 | Macquarie University
 | Utrecht University
 | Macquarie University
 | Renmin University of China
Published online: 3 June 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.20003.col
Abstract
A number of studies have found that grammatical differences across registers are more extensive than those across dialects. However, there is a paucity of research examining intervarietal register change, exploring how registers change differently over time in different regional varieties. The present study addresses this diachronic deficit, focusing on grammatical developments – from the early 20th to the early 21st century – in corpora representing three written registers and two speech-based registers in Australian, British and American English. We conducted a factor analysis on 68 lexicogrammatical features to identify six dimensions of register variation, and subsequently investigated the diachronic change of the five registers across these dimensions. We interpret our findings in terms of the differential effects of broad social changes on individual registers, in light of existing findings on trends of change in different registers and varieties.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Historical sketch of Australian English in the 20th century
  • 3.Situational characteristics of the five registers
  • 4.The data
  • 5.The grammatical features
  • 6.Methodology
    • 6.1Factor analysis: Identifying dimensions
    • 6.2Regression analysis: Dimension scores across registers, varieties, and time
  • 7.Results
    • 7.1Factor analysis: Identifying dimensions
      • 7.1.1Dimension 1: Information presentation/elaboration and stance marking under production pressure
      • 7.1.2Dimension 2: Personal-active versus impersonal-informational-compressed discourse
      • 7.1.3Dimension 3: Unmarked/non-perspectival versus perspectivally marked information presentation
      • 7.1.4Dimension 4: Comparison and intensification (without stance marking)
      • 7.1.5Dimension 5: Contextualised speech reporting
      • 7.1.6Dimension 6: Descriptive specification of past events
    • 7.2Regression analysis: Registers across varieties and time
      • 7.2.1Dimension 1: Information presentation/elaboration and stance marking under production pressure
      • 7.2.2Dimension 2: Personal-active versus impersonal-informational-compressed discourse
      • 7.2.3Dimension 3: Unmarked/non-perspectival versus perspectivally marked information presentation
      • 7.2.4Dimension 4: Comparison and intensification (without stance marking)
      • 7.2.5Dimension 5: Contextualised speech reporting
      • 7.2.6Dimension 6: Descriptive specification of pastevents
  • 8.Summary and interpretation of findings
    • 8.1Synthesis of findings
    • 8.2Observable trends
  • 9.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Corpora
  • References
References (33)
References
Aarts, B., Close, J., Leech, G., & Wallis, S. (2013). The verb phrase in English: Investigating recent language change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, D. (2001). Scientific discourse across history: A combined multi-dimensional/rhetorical analysis of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (pp. 45–65). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Drift and the evolution of English style: A history of three genres. Language 65(3), 487–517. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multidimensional studies (pp. 66–83). London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blair, D. (1993). Australian English and Australian national identity. In G. Schulz (Ed.), The languages of Australia (pp. 62–70). Canberra: Highland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, P. (2015). Diachronic variation in the grammar of Australian English: Corpus-based explorations. In P. Collins (Ed.), Grammatical change in English world-wide (pp. 15–42). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). AusBrown: A new diachronic corpus of Australian English. ICAME Journal 431, 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Desmond, V. (1911). The awful Australian. Sydney: Shepherd: J. Andrews and Co.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fritz, C. 2007a. From Plato to Aristotle – investigating early Australian English. Australian Journal of Linguistics 241: 57–97. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007b. From English in Australia to Australian English: 1788–1900. Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6(1), 1–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Röthlisberger, M., & Seoane, E. (2019). Predicting voice alternation across academic Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. Ahead of print Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Schneider, G., & Seoane, E. (2016). The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local vs global usage in an international language. Corpora 11(1), 29–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruger, H., & Smith, A. (2018). Colloquialisation versus densification in Australian English: A multidimensional analysis of the Australian Diachronic Hansard Corpus (ADHC). Australian Journal of Linguistics 38(3), 293–328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruger, H., Van Rooy, B., & Smith, A. (2019). Register change in the British and Australian Hansard (1901–2015), Journal of English Linguistics. 47(3), 183–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., Hundt, M., Mair, C., & Smith, N. (2009). Change in contemporary English: A grammatical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mollin, S. (2007). The Hansard hazard: Gauging the accuracy of British parliamentary transcripts. Corpora 2(2), 187–210. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moore, B. (2008). Speaking our language: The story of Australian English. Sydney: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [URL]
Reeve, J. (1989). Community attitudes to Australian English. In P. Collins & D. Blair (Eds.) Australian English: The language of a new society (pp. 111–126). Brisbane: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Revelle, W. (2018). Psych: Procedures for personality and psychological Research. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA, [URL] Version = 1.8.12.
Schneider, E. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seal, G. (1999). The lingo: Listening to Australian English. Sydney: UNSW Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westin, I. (2002). Language change in English newspaper editorials. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkes, G. (1978). A dictionary of Australian colloquialisms. Sydney: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yao, X., & Collins, P. (2019). Developments in Australian English grammar from 1931 to 2006: A comparative, aggregate approach to dialectal variation and change. Journal of English Linguistics 47(2), 120–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Shen, Lin & Haidee Kotze
2025. Linguistic indicators differentiating translated and untranslated diplomatic discourse: A diachronic analysis of the United Nations General Debate (1946–2022). Lingua 320 ► pp. 103933 ff. DOI logo
Borges, Robert & Margot van den Berg
2023. Language variation in parliamentary speech in Suriname. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111], ► pp. 277 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue