Cover not available

Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 2:2 (2020) ► pp.275–305

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Elaboration, compression and explicitness across sub-registers of popular and academic writing in Hong Kong English

ORCiD logo with link | Universidad de Vigo
 | University of the Balearic Islands
Published online: 7 August 2020
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.19007.seo
Abstract
In this study we examine elaboration, compression and explicitness in academic and popular writing in an Outer Circle variety of English, that of Hong-Kong, as represented in the International Corpus of English corpus. As (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English. Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar show, contemporary academic discourse is structurally compressed at NP level (rather than elaborated) and inexplicit in the expression of meaning. The linguistic features selected for analysis are short passives, which are compressed and inexplicit, and adnominal relative clauses, which represent the opposite tendency, that towards elaboration and explicitness. We focus on register variation through analyzing, first, differences between academic and popular writing, and second, interdisciplinary variation in four sub-registers: humanities, social sciences, natural sciences and technology.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: A register approach to Hong Kong English
    • 2.1Popular and academic writing in the International Corpus of English: Context, function and sub-disciplinary areas
    • 2.2Adnominal relative postmodifiers and passives clauses
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Passives in HKE academic and popular writing
    • 4.2Relative clauses in HKE academic and popular writing
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (44)
References
Baratta, A. (2009). Revealing stance through passive voice. Journal of Pragmatics, 411, 1406–1421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Egbert, J. and Zhang, M. (2018). Using corpus-based analysis to study register and dialect variation on the searchable web. In E. Friginal (ed.), Studies in Corpus-Based Sociolinguistics, 83–111. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre and style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 91, 2–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English. Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (eds.) (2001). Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1996). Inferring identifiability and accessibility. In T. Fretheim & J. K. Gundel (Eds.), Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and points of view (pp. 37–46). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dorgeloh, H., & Wanner, A. (2010). Introduction. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 1–26). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2016). Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 14(2), 233–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 301, 5–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, B. (2013). More than discipline: uncovering multi-dimensional patterns of variation in academic research articles. Corpora, 8(2), 153–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015a). On the complexity of academic writing: Disciplinary variation and structural complexity. In V. Cortes & E. Csomay (Eds.), Corpus-based research in applied linguistics. In honor of Douglas Biber (pp. 49–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, S. (1996). Comparing English worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habibie, P., & Hyland, K. (Eds.), (2019). Novice writers and scholarly publication. authors, mentors, gatekeepers. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, M. (2015). World Englishes. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 381–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hundt, M., Schneider, G., Seoane, E. (2016). The use of the be-passive in academic Englishes: Local vs global usage in an international language. Corpora, 11(1), 29–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2006). Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses. In K. Hyland & M. Bondi (Eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines (pp. 17–45). Frankfurt: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015). Genre, discipline and identity. English for Academic Purposes, 191, 32–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Imo, W. (2010). Mein Problem ist/mein Thema ist (‘My problem is/my topic is’): How syntactic patterns and genres interact. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 141–166). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. International Corpus of English ([URL]).
Irvine, J. (2001). ‘Style’as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 21–43). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning the language and literatures (pp. 11–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). A multifactorial analysis of contact-induced change in speech reporting in written White South African English (WSAfE). English Language and Linguistics. E-pub before print. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G., M. Hundt, C. Mair & N. Smith. (2009). Change in contemporary English. A grammatical style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondorf, B. (2010). Genre effects in the replacement of reflexives by particles. In H. Dorgeloh & A. Wanner (Eds.), Syntactic variation and genre (pp. 219–245). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Neumann, S. (2013). Contrastive register variation: A quantitative approach to the comparison of English and German. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, E. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seoane, E. (2006). Changing styles: On the recent evolution of scientific British and American English. In C. Dalton-Puffer, D. Kastovsky, N. Ritt & H. Schendl (Eds.), Syntax, style and grammatical norms: English from 1500–2000 (pp. 191–211). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Givenness and word order: A study of long passives in Modern and Present-Day English. In A. Meurman-Solin, M. J. López-Couso & B. Los (Eds.), Information structure and syntactic change in the history of English (pp. 139–163). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seoane, E., & Hundt, M. (2018). Styling academic Englishes: authorial presence across disciplines. Journal of English Linguistics, 46(1), 3–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Setter, J., Wong, C. S. P., Chan, B. H. S. (2010). Hong Kong English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suárez-Gómez, C. (2014). Relative clauses in Asian Englishes. Journal of English Linguistics, 42(3), 245–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tarone, E., Dwyer, S., Gillette, S., & Icke, V. (1998). On the use of the passive and active voice in astrophysics journal papers: With extensions to other languages and other fields. English for Specific Purposes, 17(1), 113–132. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tse, P. & K. Hyland. (2010). Claiming a territory: Relative clauses in journal descriptions. Journal of Pragmatics, 421, 1880–1889. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Rooy, B., Terblanche, L., Haase, C. & Schmied, J. (2010). Register differentiation in East African English: A multidimensional study. English World-Wide, 31(3), 311–349.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wood, A. (2001). International scientific English: The language of research scientists around the world. In J. Flowerdew & M. Peacock (Eds.), Perspectives on English for academic purposes (pp. 71–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiao, R. (2009). Multidimensional analysis and the study of World Englishes. World Englishes, 28(4), 421–450. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Batchelor, Jordan
2023. Scientists say: Patterns of attribution in popular and professional science writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 65 ► pp. 101273 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue