Cover not available

Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 2:1 (2020) ► pp.72101

References (50)
References
Axelsson, K. (2009). Research on fiction dialogue: Problems and possible solutions. In A. H. Jucker, D. Schreier and M. Hundt (Eds.), Corpora: Pragmatics and discourse. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 189–201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, Genre, and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barlow, M. (2016). WordSkew. Linking corpus data and discourse structure. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 21(1), 105–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (2014). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 8(4), 243–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2018). Register variation online. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1994). Multi-dimensional analyses of authors’ styles: Some case studies from the eigtheenth century. In D. Ross & D. Brink (Eds.), Research in humanities computing (pp. 3–17). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66–83). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burrows, J. F. (1987). Computation into criticism: A study of Jane Austen’s novels and an experiment in method. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clarke, I., & Grieve, J. (2017). Dimensions of abusive language on Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Abusive Language Online (pp. 1–10), Vancouver, Canada (August 4, 2017). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (2001). Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, J. & Kytö, M. (2010). Early modern English dialogues: Spoken interactions as writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, M., & Gardner, D. (2010). A frequency dictionary of contemporary American English. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, P. (1996). More on the language of dialogue in fiction. ICAME Journal, 201, 23–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Davies, M. (2015). Developing a bottom-up, user-based method of web register classification. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(9): 1817–1831. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J., & Schnur, E. (2018). Missing the trees for the forest: The role of the text in corpus and discourse analysis. In A. Marchi & C. Taylor (Eds.), Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review. New York, NY: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, L. (2003). A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problem-solution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gavins, J. (2007). Text world theory. An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gray, B. (2011). Exploring academic writing through corpus linguistics: When discipline tells only part of the story (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northern Arizona University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoey, M. (2001). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse anlaysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hubbard, E. H. (2002). Conversation, characterization and corpus linguistics: Dialogue in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility . Literator, 23(2), 67–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. & Short, M. (2007). Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edition. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kyto, M., Rudanko, J., & Smitterberg, E. (2000). Building a bridge between the present and the past: A corpus of 19th-century English. ICAME journal, 241, 85–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M. (2013). Corpus stylistics and Dickens’s fiction. London: Routledge.. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M & Stockwell, P (2016). Point and CLiC: Teaching literature with corpus stylistic tools. In M. Burke, O. Fialho & S. Zyngier (Eds.), Scientific approaches to literature in learning environments (pp. 251–267). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Stockwell, P., de Joode, J., Smith, C., & O’Donnell, M. Brook. (2016). CLiC Dickens – Novel uses of concordances for the integration of corpus stylistics and cognitive poetics. Corpora, 11(3), 433–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Stockwell, P., & A. Hennessey. (2019a). Speech-bundles in the 19th-century English Novel. Language and Literature, 28(4), 326–353. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Lentin, J., et al. (2019b). CLiC User Guide v2.0.1 documentation. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (19, August 2019).
Mooi, E., & Sarstedt, M. (2010). Data. In R. Stahlbock, S. F. Crone, & S. Lessmann (Eds.), A concise guide to market research (pp. 25–44). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, J. (2015). Discriminant analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Donnell, M. B., Scott, M., Mahlberg, M., & Hoey, M. (2012). Exploring text-initial words, clusters and concgrams in a newspaper corpus. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 73–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oostdijk, N. (1990). The language of dialogue in fiction. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 5(3), 235–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Page, N. (1988). Speech in the English novel. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B. (1996). Genre, text type, and the language learning classroom. ELT Journal, 50(3), 237–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poulsen, J., & French, A. (2008). Discriminant function analysis. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (23 October 2017).
Rosso, M. A. (2008). User-based identification of web genres. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(7), 1053–1072. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, E., & Short, M. (2004). Corpus stylistics: Speech, writing and thought presentation in a corpus of English writing. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S., & Biber, D. (2015). Cluster analysis. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorensen, K. (1989). Narration and speech-rendering in Dickens. Dickens Quarterly, 6(4), 131.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (22)

Cited by 22 other publications

Sun, Yifeng & Kanglong Liu
2025. Stylistic nuances through syntactic complexity: A corpus-assisted study of narration and dialogue in two english translations of Hongloumeng. Applied Corpus Linguistics 5:2  pp. 100125 ff. DOI logo
Chou, Isabelle & Kanglong Liu
2024. Style in speech and narration of two English translations of Hongloumeng . Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 36:1  pp. 76 ff. DOI logo
Chou, Isabelle, Zhangyujie Xiang & Kanglong Liu
2024. Unravelling the stylistic nuances: a comparative multidimensional analysis of amateur and professional translations of Legends of the Condor Heroes. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Demir, Nur Yağmur, Ryan Bartholomew & Tove Larsson
2024. “I’m on retreat and will respond to messages after 7/6”. Register Studies 6:2  pp. 175 ff. DOI logo
Ebeling, Signe Oksefjell
Ehret, Katharina, Laurens Bosman, Aminat Babayode, Nicole Chan, Ivan Fong, Noelle Harris, Alissa Hewton, Danica Reid, Rebekah Wong & Maite Taboada
2024. Podcasts as an emerging register of computer-mediated communication. Register Studies 6:2  pp. 128 ff. DOI logo
Li, Jialei
2024. Colloquialism and genre variation in Chinese. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 15:1  pp. 73 ff. DOI logo
Rosmawati & Wander Lowie
2024. Multifractal Analysis of the Distribution of Three Grammatical Constructions in English Texts. Journal of Quantitative Linguistics 31:1  pp. 19 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Zhongliang & Kanglong Liu
2024. Linguistic Variations Between Translated and Non-Translated English Chairman’s Statements in Corporate Annual Reports: A Multidimensional Analysis. Sage Open 14:2 DOI logo
Woodin, Greg & Bodo Winter
2024. Numbers in Context: Cardinals, Ordinals, and Nominals in American English. Cognitive Science 48:6 DOI logo
Woodin, Greg, Bodo Winter, Jeannette Littlemore, Marcus Perlman & Jack Grieve
2024. Large-scale patterns of number use in spoken and written English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:1  pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Egbert, Jesse & Marianna Gracheva
2023. Linguistic variation within registers: granularity in textual units and situational parameters. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 19:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Gast, Volker, Christian Wehmeier & Dirk Vanderbeke
2023. A Register-Based Study of Interior Monologue in James Joyce’s Ulysses. Literature 3:1  pp. 42 ff. DOI logo
Kuzai, Einat & Hagit Shefer
2023. Pragmatic overlap and consecutive change: The case of Hebrew (inter)subjective markers yeʃ/en matsav/sikuy. Journal of Pragmatics 207  pp. 17 ff. DOI logo
Mohseni, Mahdi, Christoph Redies & Volker Gast
2023. Comparative Analysis of Preference in Contemporary and Earlier Texts Using Entropy Measures. Entropy 25:3  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Pescuma, Valentina N., Dina Serova, Julia Lukassek, Antje Sauermann, Roland Schäfer, Aria Adli, Felix Bildhauer, Markus Egg, Kristina Hülk, Aine Ito, Stefanie Jannedy, Valia Kordoni, Milena Kuehnast, Silvia Kutscher, Robert Lange, Nico Lehmann, Mingya Liu, Beate Lütke, Katja Maquate, Christine Mooshammer, Vahid Mortezapour, Stefan Müller, Muriel Norde, Elizabeth Pankratz, Angela G. Patarroyo, Ana-Maria Pleşca, Camilo R. Ronderos, Stephanie Rotter, Uli Sauerland, Gohar Schnelle, Britta Schulte, Gediminas Schüppenhauer, Bianca Maria Sell, Stephanie Solt, Megumi Terada, Dimitra Tsiapou, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Melanie Weirich, Heike Wiese, Kathy Zaruba, Lars Erik Zeige, Anke Lüdeling & Pia Knoeferle
2023. Situating language register across the ages, languages, modalities, and cultural aspects: Evidence from complementary methods. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Le Foll, Elen
2021. Register variation in school EFL textbooks. Register Studies 3:2  pp. 207 ff. DOI logo
Neumann, Stella & Stefan Evert
2021. A register variation perspective on varieties of English. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Granger, Sylviane & Marie-Aude Lefer
2020. Introduction. Languages in Contrast 20:2  pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue