Cover not available

Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.168–198

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Register in English for Academic Purposes and English for Specific Purposes

 | Portland State University
Published online: 26 April 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18008.con
Abstract
Susan Conrad, Professor of Applied Linguistics at Portland State University (USA), contributes this article on the applications of register research to English for Academic Purposes (EAP) and English for Specific Purposes (ESP). Her research focuses on topics including academic register variation, discipline-specific language, student and workplace writing, and grammar and writing pedagogy. Since the 1990s, her work has advocated for and exemplified the ways in which register-based descriptions can facilitate language teaching, including building awareness of register variation in learners and novice writers themselves. This focus is illustrated in her book Real Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to English (Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (2009). Real grammar: A corpus-based approach to English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, Pearson Longman), which takes many of the major register-based patterns of variation in English grammar (described in the Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English, Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar) and translates them into practical grammar lessons for language learners, making explicit how grammar use is mediated by register. Her applied focus is also evident in her work as Principal Investigator for the Civil Engineering Writing Project <http://​www​.cewriting​.org/>. The project, funded by the National Science Foundation, addresses the writing needs of Civil Engineering students through corpus-based register comparisons (of university student writing, practitioner workplace writing, and published academic writing), applying the results to the development and evaluation of pedagogical materials that improve students’ preparation for writing in the workplace.
Article outline
  • 1.How is register conceptualized in the field of EAP/ESP?
  • 2.How does register relate to the research goals within EAP/ESP?
  • 3.What are the major methodological approaches that are used to analyze or account for register in EAP/ESP?
  • 4.What does a typical register study look like in EAP/ESP?
    • 4.1Methodology
    • 4.2Findings
  • 5.What are the most promising areas of future register research in EAP/ESP?
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (105)
References
Atkinson, D. (1992). The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985: The case of the Edinburgh Medical Journal . Applied Linguistics, 13(4), 337–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1996). The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675–1975: A sociohistorical discourse analysis. Language in Society, 25(3), 333–371. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baffy, M. (2017). Shifting frames to construct a Legal English class. English for Academic Purposes, 251, 58–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banks, D. (2008). The development of scientific writing: Linguistic features and historical context. London: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Banset, E., & Parsons, G. (1989). Communications failure in Hyatt Regency disaster. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering, 115(3), 273–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barber, C. (1962). Some measurable characteristics of modern scientific prose. In F. Behre (Ed.), Contributions to English syntax and philology (pp. 21–43). Gothenborg: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beer, D., & McMurrey, D. (2014). A guide to writing as an engineer, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. (1993). Analysing genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhatia, V., & Bremner, S. (2012). English for business communication. Language Teaching, 45(4), 410–445. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 62(2), 384–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 8(1), 9–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in press). Register, genre, style, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V. (2004). If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistic, 25(3), 371–405. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2016). Register variation on the searchable web. Journal of English Linguistics, 44(2), 95–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Finegan, E. (1989). Styles of stance in English: Lexical and grammatical marking of evidentiality and affect. Text, 9(1), 93–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Diachronic relations among speech-based and written registers in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 66–83). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(1), 2–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), 5–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cao, Y., & Xiao, R. (2013). A multi-dimensional contrastive study of English abstracts by native and non-native writers. Corpora, 8(2), 209–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M. (2006). Phraseological patterns in reporting clauses used in citation: A corpus-based study of theses in two disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 25(3), 310–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charles, M., & Pecorari, D. (2016). Introducing English for academic purposes. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, S., Boyajian, D., & Inyang, H. (2011). SLSE damage detection technique for foundation strengthening using plates. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29(3), 237–248. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chen, Y., & Baker, P. (2010). Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 30–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, W., Greaves, C., & Warren, M. (2008). A corpus-driven study of discourse intonation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S. (2015). Register variation. In D. Biber & R. Reppen (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics (pp. 309–329). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). A comparison of practitioner and student writing in civil engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(2), 191–217. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2018). The use of passives and impersonal style in civil engineering writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(1), 38–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S., & Biber, D. (2001). Multi-dimensional methodology and the dimensions of register variation in English. In S. Conrad & D. Biber (Eds.), Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies (pp. 13–42). Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S. & Biber, D. (2009). Real grammar: A corpus-based approach to English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conrad, S., Kitch, W., Pfeiffer, T., Smith, T., & Tocco, J. (2015). Students writing for professional practice: A model for collaboration among faculty, practitioners and writing specialists. Proceedings of the 2015 American Society for Engineering Education Conference, Seattle, Washington. <[URL]>
Conrad, S., Lamb, K., & Pfeiffer, T. (2018). Where grammar, content, and professional practice meet: The case of the passive voice. Proceedings of the 2018 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. <[URL]>
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013). The purpose of this study is to: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couture, B. (1992). Categorizing professional discourse: Engineering, administrative, and technical/professional writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 6(1), 5–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213–238. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Csomay, E., & Prades, A. (2018). Academic vocabulary in ESL student papers: A corpus-based study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 331, 100–118. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ding, D. (2002). The passive voice and social values in science. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 32(2), 137–154.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyfus, S., Humphrey, S., Mahboob, A., & Martin, J. (2016). Genre pedagogy in higher education. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Egbert, J. (2014). Student perceptions of stylistic variation in introductory university textbooks. Linguistics and Education, 251, 64–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
English for Specific Purposes: An international research journal. (2018). <[URL]>
Ferguson, C. (1983). Sports announcer talk: Syntactic aspects of register variation. Language in Society, 12(2), 153–72. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fouché, I., van Dyk, T., & Butler, G. (2017). An “enlightening course that empowers first years”?: A holistic assessment of the impact of a first-year academic literacy course. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 271, 14–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, E., Li, M., & Weigle, S. (2014). Revisiting multiple profiles of learner compositions: A comparison of highly rated NS and NNS essays. Journal of Second Language Writing, 231, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Friginal, E., & Mustafa, S. (2017). A comparison of U.S.-based and Iraqi English research article abstracts using corpora. English for Academic Purpose, 251, 45–57. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, D., & Davies, M. (2014). A new academic vocabulary list. Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 305–327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardner, S. (2012). Genres and registers of student report writing: An SFL perspective on texts and practices. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 52–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gollin-Kies, S., Hall, D., & Moore, S. (2015). Language for specific purposes. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gries, S. (2008). Dispersions and adjusted frequencies in corpora. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 13(4), 403–437. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gwiasda, K. (1984). Of classrooms and contexts: Teaching engineers to write wrong. IEEE Transactions on Education, E-27, 148–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1993). Some grammatical problems in scientific English. In M. Halliday & J. Martin (Eds.), Writing science (pp. 69–85). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar, 3rd ed. London: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Handford, M. (2010). The language of business meetings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardy, J., & Römer, U. (2013). Revealing disciplinary variation in student writing: A multi-dimensional analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 8(2), 183–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirvela, A. (2013). ESP and reading. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 76–94). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hunston, S. (2013). Systemic functional linguistics, corpus linguistics, and the ideology of science. Text & Talk, 331, 617–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 71, 173–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. (2017). Profiling maritime communication by non-native speakers: A quantitative comparison between the baseline and standard marine communication phraseology. English for Specific Purposes, 471, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2007). Rhetorical moves in biochemistry research articles. In D. Biber, U. Connor, & T. Upton (Eds.), Discourse on the move (pp. 73–103). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knuttson, O., Blåsjö, M., Hållsten, S., Karlström, P. (2012). Identifying different registers of digital literacy in virtual learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(4), 237–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, D. (2001). Genres, registers, text types, domains, and styles: Clarifying the concepts and navigating a path through the BNC jungle. Language Learning & Technology, 5(3), 37–72.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, J., & Casal, J. (2014). Metadiscourse in results and discussion chapters: A cross-linguistic analysis of English and Spanish thesis writers in engineering. System, 461, 39–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lessard-Clouston, M. (2010). Theology lectures as lexical environments: A case study of technical vocabulary use. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 308–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. (2006). Professional academic writing by multilingual scholars. Written Communication, 23(1), 3–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matthiessen, C. (2019). Register in systemic functional linguistics. Register Studies, 1(1), 10–14 (this issue). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauranen, A. (2011). English as a lingua franca of the academic world. In D. Belcher, A. Johns, & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 143–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGrath, L. (2016). Self-mentions in anthropology and history research articles: Variation between and within disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 211, 86–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mudraya, O. (2006). Engineering English: A lexical frequency instructional model. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 235–256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Myers, G. (2010). The discourse of blogs and wikis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nature (2017, March). Fake news: Science journalism can be evidence-based and compelling but still get it wrong [Editorial]. Nature, 5431 (7644) 1501.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nelson, M. (2006). Semantic associations in Business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 25(2), 217–234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nesi, H., & Gardner, S. (2012). Genres across the disciplines: Student writing in higher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Northcott, J. (2013). Legal English. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 214–226). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (Eds.) (2013). The handbook of English for Specific Purposes. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parfitt, M. & Parfitt, E. (2007). Failures education: The key to better engineering design. Structure Magazine, January 2007, 10–12.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, J. (2013). English for science and technology. In B. Paltridge & S. Starfield (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 155–173). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 141, 48–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pessoa, S., Miller, R., & Kaufer, D. (2014). Students’ challenges and development in the transition to academic writing at an English-medium university in Qatar. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 52(2), 127–156. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reave, L. (2004). Technical communication instruction in engineering schools. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 18(4), 452–490. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Research Centre for Professional Communication in English (2017). Mission. <[URL]>
Römer, U., & O’Donnell, M. (2011). From student hard drive to web corpus (part 1): The design, compilation and genre classification of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-level Student Papers (MICUSP). Corpora, 6(2), 159–77. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sageev, P., & Romanowski, C. (2001). A message from recent engineering graduates in the workplace: Results of a survey on technical communication skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(4), 685–693. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sales, H. (2006). Professional communication practices in engineering. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spector, T. (1994). Writing a scientific manuscript: Highlights for success. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(1), 47–50. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staples, S. (2016). Identifying linguistic features of medical interactions: A register analysis. In L. Pickering, E. Friginal & S. Staples (Eds.), Talking at work: Corpus-based explorations of workplace discourse (pp. 179–208). London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tardy, C. (2011). ESP and multi-method approaches to genre analysis. In D. Belcher, A. Johns & B. Paltridge (Eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research (pp. 143–173). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomas, S., Tucker, R., & Kelly, W. (1998). Critical communication variables. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(1), 58–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, P., Hunston, S., Murakami, A., & Vajn, D. (2017). Multi-dimensional analysis, text constellations, and interdisciplinary discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 22(2), 153–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, S., Morton, T., & O’Keeffe, A. (2011). Analysing university spoken interaction: A CL/CA approach. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 16(3), 325–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. (1998). Communication and community: The pragmatics of ESP. English for Specific Purposes, 17(1), 3–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wingate, U. (2015). Academic literacy and student diversity: The case for inclusive practice. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. (2009). How technical communication textbooks fail engineering students. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 351–375. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Woodrow, L. (2017). Introducing course design in English for specific purposes. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Liu, ZuoYuan, Ainash Alzhanova, Aizhan Smailova, Olga Pavlovskaya & Olga Sakhno
2025. Studying English Among Economics Students in the Context of Global Cross-Cultural Communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication ► pp. 250 ff. DOI logo
Zitha, Innocent & Matodzi Nancy Lambani
2024. Register competence in academic writing of student teachers specialising in English didactics at the University of Venda. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 42:sup1 DOI logo
Marko, Karoline, Margit Reitbauer & Georg Pickl
2022. Same person, different platform. Register Studies 4:2 ► pp. 202 ff. DOI logo
Meyer, David & Verena Pietzner
2022. Reading textual and non-textual explanations in chemistry texts and textbooks – a review. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23:4 ► pp. 768 ff. DOI logo
Jeaco, Stephen
2021. Exploring register withThe Prime Machine. Register Studies 3:2 ► pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2025. Corpus Linguistics for Language Learning Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 12], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue