Article published In: Register Studies
Vol. 1:1 (2019) ► pp.42–75
Text-linguistic approaches to register variation
Published online: 26 April 2019
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib
https://doi.org/10.1075/rs.18007.bib
Abstract
Douglas Biber, Regents’ Professor of Applied Linguistics at Northern Arizona University, authors this article
exploring the connections between register and a text-linguistic approach to language variation. He has spent the last 30 years
pursuing a research program that explores the inherent link between register and language use, including at the phraseological,
grammatical, and lexico-grammatical levels. His seminal book Variation across Speech and Writing ( (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. , Cambridge University Press) launched multi-dimensional (MD) analysis, a
comprehensive framework and methodology for the large-scale study of register variation. This approach was innovative in taking a
text-linguistic approach to characterize language use across situations of use through the quantitative and functional analysis of
linguistic co-occurrence patterns and underlying dimensions of language use. MD analysis is now used widely to study register
variation over time, in general and specialized registers, in learner language, and across a range of languages. In 1999, the
Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English (Biber et al.) became the first comprehensive descriptive
reference book to systematically consider register variation in describing the grammatical and lexico-grammatical patterns of use
in English. Douglas Biber’s quantitative linguistic research has consistently demonstrated the importance of register as a
predictor of language variation. In his own words, “register always matters” (Gray, B. (2013). Interview with Douglas Biber. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(4), 359–379. : 360, Interview with Douglas Biber, English Language & Linguistics).
Article outline
- 1.How is register conceptualized in text linguistics and in the text-linguistic approach to register variation?
- 2.What are the research goals of the text-linguistic approach to register variation?
- 3.What are the major methodological approaches that are used to analyze or account for register in the text-linguistic approach?
- 4.What does a typical study of register variation look like in the text-linguistic approach?
- 5.What are the most promising areas of future research on register variation from a text- linguistic perspective?
References
References (49)
Baker, P., & Egbert, J. (Eds.). (2016). Triangulating methodological approaches in corpus linguistic research. New York: Routledge.
Barbieri, F., & Wizner, S. (in press). Appendix A: Annotations of major register and genre studies. In D. Biber & S. Conrad. Register, genre, and style, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bernstein, B. (1970). Class, codes, and control, Vol. I: Theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge.
Biber, D. (1986). Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language, 621, 384–414.
(1995). Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2006). University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
(2012). Register as a predictor of linguistic variation. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 81, 9–37.
(2014). Using multi-dimensional analysis to explore cross-linguistic universals of register variation. Languages in Contrast, 14(1), 7–34.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multi-dimensional comparison. TESOL Quarterly 361, 9–48.
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Davies, M. (2015). Exploring the composition of the searchable web: A corpus-based taxonomy of web registers. Corpora, 10(1), 11–45.
Biber, D., Egbert, J., Gray, B., Oppliger, R., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2016). Variationist versus text-linguistic approaches to grammatical change in English: Nominal modifiers of head nouns. In M. Kytö & P. Pahta (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of English historical linguistics, pp. 351–375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Egbert, J., & Keller, D. (under review). Reconceptualizing register in a continuous situational space. Ms.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics, 151, 223–250.
(2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 411, 104–134.
(2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., & Gray, B. & K. Poonpon. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 451, 5–35.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). The Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
Biber, D., & Jones, J. K. (2009). Quantitative methods in corpus linguistics. In A. Lüdeling & M. Kytö (Eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook (pp. 1286–1304). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 241, 199–208.
Brown, P., & Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In K. R. Scherer & H. Giles (Eds.), Social Markers in Speech (pp. 33–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carroll, J. B. (1960). Vectors of prose style. In T. A. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 283–292). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Chafe, W. L. (1982). Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature. In D. Tannen (Ed.) Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 35–54). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Chafe, W. L., & Danielewicz, J. (1986). Properties of spoken and written language. In R. Horowitz & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 82–113). New York: Academic Press.
Conrad, S., & D. Biber (Eds.). (2001). Variation in English: Multi-dimensional studies. London: Longman.
Eckert, P., & Rickford, J. R. (Eds.). (2001). Style and sociolinguistic variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Egbert, J., & Biber, D. (2016). Do all roads lead to Rome?: Modeling register variation with factor analysis and discriminant analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 14(2), 233–273.
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1972). On sociolinguistic rules: Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 213–250). New York: Holt.
Ferguson, C. A. (1994). Dialect, registers, and genre: Working assumptions about conventionalization. In Biber, D. & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 15–30). New York: Oxford University Press.
Finegan, E., & Biber, D. (1994). Register and social dialect variation: An integrated approach. In D. Biber & E. Finegan (Eds.), Sociolinguistic perspectives on register (pp. 315–347). New York: Oxford University Press.
(2001). Register variation and social dialect variation: The register axiom. In P. Eckert & J. R. Rickford (Eds.), Style and sociolinguistic variation (pp. 235–267). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
(2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy, (Ed.). Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic feature (pp. 162–178). London: Pinter.
(1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Irvine, J. (1979). Formality and informality in communicative events. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.) Language in use: Readings in sociolinguistics (pp. 211–228). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Ochs, E. (1979). Planned and unplanned discourse. In T. Givón (Ed.) Discourse and syntax (pp. 51–80). New York: Academic Press.
Cited by (45)
Cited by 45 other publications
Andersson, Marta & Dan McIntyre
Asiri, Ali & Shanshan Xiao
Biber, Douglas & Tove Larsson
Cheung, Lisa
Curry, Niall & Pascual Pérez-Paredes
Cvrček, Václav & Martina Berrocal
Marklová, Anna, Chris Demian, Roland Meyer, Luka Szucsich & Olga Buchmüller
Polzenhagen, Frank
Skantsi, Valtteri & Veronika Laippala
Zhao, Xinyu, William J. Crawford & Hua Chen
Berber Sardinha, Tony
BIBER, DOUGLAS, BENEDIKT SZMRECSANYI, RANDI REPPEN & TOVE LARSSON
Egbert, Jesse, Douglas Biber, Daniel Keller & Marianna Gracheva
Gerosa, Marco, Bianca Trinkenreich, Igor Steinmacher & Anita Sarma
Jacobson, Holly E.
Kang, Mengchao, Tan Jin, Xiaofei Lu & Haomin Zhang
Rosmawati & Wander Lowie
Rosseel, Laura, Eline Zenner, Fabian Faviana & Bavo Van Landeghem
Seoane, Elena & Lucía Loureiro-Porto
2024. A diachronic corpus-pragmatic approach to democratization. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 25:2 ► pp. 215 ff.
Biber, Douglas & Jesse Egbert
Delfino, Maria Claudia Nunes, Tony Berber Sardinha & Joseph Glynn Collentine
Egbert, Jesse & Marianna Gracheva
Egbert, Jesse, Bethany Gray & Tove Larsson
Marklová, Anna, Olga Buchmüller, Christoph Demian, Roland Meyer & Luka Szucsich
Pescuma, Valentina N., Dina Serova, Julia Lukassek, Antje Sauermann, Roland Schäfer, Aria Adli, Felix Bildhauer, Markus Egg, Kristina Hülk, Aine Ito, Stefanie Jannedy, Valia Kordoni, Milena Kuehnast, Silvia Kutscher, Robert Lange, Nico Lehmann, Mingya Liu, Beate Lütke, Katja Maquate, Christine Mooshammer, Vahid Mortezapour, Stefan Müller, Muriel Norde, Elizabeth Pankratz, Angela G. Patarroyo, Ana-Maria Pleşca, Camilo R. Ronderos, Stephanie Rotter, Uli Sauerland, Gohar Schnelle, Britta Schulte, Gediminas Schüppenhauer, Bianca Maria Sell, Stephanie Solt, Megumi Terada, Dimitra Tsiapou, Elisabeth Verhoeven, Melanie Weirich, Heike Wiese, Kathy Zaruba, Lars Erik Zeige, Anke Lüdeling & Pia Knoeferle
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
Vandeweerd, Nathan, Alex Housen & Magali Paquot
Xu, Ya & Yi Zhang
Chaves, Ana Paula, Jesse Egbert, Toby Hocking, Eck Doerry & Marco Aurelio Gerosa
Chaves, Ana Paula & Marco Aurelio Gerosa
Chen, Heng & Haitao Liu
Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
Fang, Zhihui, Valerie Gresser, Peijuan Cao & Huibin Zhang
Marko, Karoline, Margit Reitbauer & Georg Pickl
Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert, Daniel Keller & Stacey Wizner
2021. Extending text-linguistic studies of register variation to a continuous situational space. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 19 ff.
Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert, Daniel Keller & Stacey Wizner
Crawford, William J. & Meixiu Zhang
2021. How can register analysis inform task-based language teaching?. Register Studies 3:2 ► pp. 180 ff.
Engel, Alexandra, Jason Grafmiller, Laura Rosseel, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Freek Van de Velde
2021. How register-specific is probabilistic grammatical knowledge?. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 51 ff.
Neumann, Stella & Stefan Evert
2021. A register variation perspective on varieties of English. In Corpus-based approaches to register variation [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 103], ► pp. 143 ff.
Biber, Douglas, Jesse Egbert & Daniel Keller
Goulart, Larissa, Bethany Gray, Shelley Staples, Amanda Black, Aisha Shelton, Douglas Biber, Jesse Egbert & Stacey Wizner
Seoane, Elena & Cristina Suárez-Gómez
2020. Elaboration, compression and explicitness across sub-registers of popular and academic writing in Hong Kong English. Register Studies 2:2 ► pp. 275 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
