Cover not available

Article published In: Revue Romane
Vol. 50:2 (2015) ► pp.222–278

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

La coesione testuale dei lanci di agenzia

Uno studio delle anafore di ordine superiore

 | Universität Basel

Article language: Italian

Published online: 10 March 2016
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.50.2.03pec
This study examines forms and functions of higher-order anaphora in a corpus of Italian news reports. Quantitative analysis shows a correlation between the size of the text and the subtype of anaphora (anaphoric encapsulation is more frequent in shorter texts, strict coreference in longer ones). A very common pattern of encapsulation is realised by the clitic lo as the topical object of a verb of saying, with the function of ascribing the news to an external source. As far as lexical encapsulations are concerned, information structure and syntactic form display unexpected results: non-topical and definite NPs outnumber topical and demonstrative ones. Finally, the relation between anaphora and the logical dimension of texts is highlighted through the analysis of relational encapsulations.
References (110)
Andorno, C. (2003): Linguistica testuale. Un’introduzione. Carocci, Roma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D. (1995a): Rôle et fonctionnement de l’anaphore dans la dynamique textuelle. Droz, Genève-Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1995b): Nominalisations, référents clandestins et anaphores atypiques. Travaux neuchâtelois de linguistique (TRANEL), 231, pp. 143–173.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Apothéloz, D. & C. Chanet (1997): Défini et démonstratif dans les nominalisations, in: de Mulder, W., L. Tasmowski-De-Ryck & C. Vetters (éds): Relations anaphoriques et (in)cohérence. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 159–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auricchio, A., C. Masseron & C. Perrin (1995): L’anaphore démonstrative à fonction résomptive. Pratiques, 851, pp. 27–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Authier, J. (1978): Les formes du discours rapporté. Remarques syntax et sémantiques à partir des traitements proposés. Université de Paris VIII, DRLAV (Documentation et Recherche en Linguistique Allemande Contemporaine – Vincennes), Paris, 171, pp. 1–87.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaugrande, R.-A. De & W.U. Dressler (1981): Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Niemeyer, Tübingen (trad. It. (1984): Introduzione alla linguistica testuale. Il Mulino, Bologna). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1991): The Language of News Media. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berretta, M. (1990): Catene anaforiche in prospettiva funzionale: antecedenti difficili. Rivista di Linguistica, 2,1, pp. 91–120.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berruto, G. (1987): Sociolinguistica dell’italiano contemporaneo. La Nuova Italia Scientifica, Roma (nuova edizione, Carocci, Roma, 2012).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. & A. Chervel (1966): Recherches sur le syntagme substantif. Cahiers de lexicologie, IX, 2, pp. 3–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonomi, I. (1993): I giornali e l’italiano dell’uso medio. Studi di Grammatica Italiana, XV1, pp. 181–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2002): L’italiano giornalistico. Dall’inizio del ‘900 ai quotidiani on line. Cesati, Firenze.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2003): La lingua dei quotidiani, in: Bonomi, I., A. Masini & S. Morgana (a cura di): La lingua italiana e i mass media. Carocci, Roma, pp. 127–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010): Giornali, lingua dei, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 580–583.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014): L’italiano giornalistico dalla carta al web: costanti e novità, in: Suomela-Härmä, E. & E. Garavelli (a cura di): Dal manoscritto al web: canali e modalità di trasmissione dell’italiano. Tecniche, materiali e usi nella storia della lingua. Atti del XII Congresso SILFI (Helsinki, 18–20 giugno 2012), Cesati, Firenze, pp. 159–178.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Borreguero Zuloaga, M. (2006): Naturaleza y función de los encapsuladores en los textos informativamente densos (la noticia periodística). Cuadernos de Filología Italiana, 131, pp. 73–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, G. & G. Yule (1983): Discourse Analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calaresu, E. (2004): Testuali parole. La dimensione pragmatica e testuale del discorso riportato. Franco Angeli, Milano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caselli, T. (2009): Using a Generative Lexicon resource to compute bridging anaphora in Italian. Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural, 421, pp. 71–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, W. (1987): Cognitive constraints on information flow, in: Tomlin, R.S. (ed.): Coherence and Grounding in Discourse. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 21–51. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cicalese, A. (1999): Le estensioni di verbo supporto. Uno studio introduttivo. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XXVIII, 3, pp. 447–485.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H. (1975): Bridging, in: Schank, R.C. & B.L. Nash-Webber (eds): Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computing Machinery, New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Consten, M. & M. Knees (2005): Complex anaphors – ontology and resolution, in: Dekker, P. & M. Franke (eds): Proceedings of the Fifteenth Amsterdam Colloquium, December 19-21 2005. ILLC, Amsterdam, pp. 65–70.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conte, M.-E. (1977): Introduzione, in: Conte, M.-E. (a cura di): La linguistica testuale. Feltrinelli, Milano, pp. 9–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1980): Coerenza testuale. Lingua e stile, 151, pp. 135–154 [ora in Conte, M.-E. (1999): Condizioni di coerenza. Ricerche di linguistica testuale. II ed., Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 29-46].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1981): Deissi testuale ed anafora, in: Sull’anafora. Atti del seminario. Accademia della Crusca, 14-16 dicembre 1978. Accademia della Crusca, Firenze, pp. 37–54 [ora in: Conte, M.-E. (1999): Condizioni di coerenza. Ricerche di linguistica testuale. II ed., Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 11-28].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996a): Anaphoric encapsulation, in: De Mulder, W. & L. Tasmowski (eds): Coherence and Anaphora, Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 101, pp. 1–10 [ora in: Conte, M.-E. (1999): Condizioni di coerenza. Ricerche di linguistica testuale. II ed., Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 107-114].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1996b): Dimostrativi nel testo: tra continuità e discontinuità referenziale. Lingua e Stile, 311, pp. 135–145 [ora in Conte, M.-E. (1999): Condizioni di coerenza. Ricerche di linguistica testuale. II ed., Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 97-105].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998): Il ruolo dei termini astratti nei testi, in: Bernini, G., P. Cuzzolin & P. Molinelli (a cura di): Ars Linguistica. Studi per Paolo Ramat. Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 151–160 [ora in: Conte, M.-E. (2010): Vettori del testo. Pragmatica e semantica fra storia e innovazione. Carocci, Roma, pp. 279-288].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cornish, F. (1986): Anaphoric Relations in English and French. A Discourse Perspective. Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999): Anaphora, Discourse, and Understanding. Evidence from English and French. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
D’Addio Colosimo, W. (1984): I nominali incapsulatori anaforici. Un aspetto della coesione lessicale. Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 2, 3, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1988): Nominali anaforici incapsulatori: un aspetto della coesione lessicale, in: De Mauro, T., S. Gensini & M.E. Piemontese (a cura di): Dalla parte del ricevente. Percezione, comprensione, interpretazione. Atti del XIX congresso internazionale di studi della SLI - Società di Linguistica Italiana (Roma, 1985). Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 143–151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dardano, M. (1973): Il linguaggio dei giornali italiani. Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1994): Profilo dell’italiano contemporaneo, in: Serianni, L. & P. Trifone (a cura di): Storia della lingua italiana, vol. II, Scritto e parlato. Einaudi, Torino, pp. 343–430.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cesare, A.-M. (2010): Espositivi, testi, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 1474–1478.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2011): Riassunto Progetto di ricerca Italian Constituent Order in a Contrastive Perspective (ICOCP), on line: [URL], ultimo accesso 16.11.2015.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Cesare, A.-M. & L. Baranzini (2011): La variété syntaxique des dépêches d’agence publiées en ligne. Réflexions à partir d’un corpus de langue italienne, in: Ferrari, A. & L. Lala (éds): Variétés syntaxiques dans la variété des textes online en italien: aspects micro- et macrostructuraux, Verbum, XXXIII/1-21, pp. 247–298.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dik, S.C. (1997a): The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part I: The Structure of the Clause (Kees Hengeveld, ed.). (II ed.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1997b): The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part II: Complex and Derived Structures (Kees Hengeveld, ed.). (II ed.), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin-New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. (1984): Le dire et le dit. Minuit, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. (2002): Valore intrinseco e funzioni testuali della frase nominale, in: Jansen, H., P. Polito, L. Schøsler & E. Strudsholm (a cura di): L’infinito e oltre. Omaggio a Gunver Skytte. Odense University Press, Odense, pp. 171–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009): Quale linguistica del testo? Coerenza, coesione, architettura del testo, in: Fiorentino, G. (a cura di): Perché la grammatica. Didattica della lingua tra scuola e università. Carocci, Roma, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010a): Coesione, procedure di, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 222–225.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010b): Anafora, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 59–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010c): Ellissi, fenomeni di, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 420–422.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010d): Catafora, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 183–186.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014): Linguistica del testo. Principi, fenomeni, strutture. Carocci, Roma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrari, A. & A.-M. De Cesare (2009): La progressione tematica rivisitata. Vox Romanica, 68, pp. 98–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferrari, A., L. Cignetti, A.-M. De Cesare, L. Lala, M. Mandelli, C. Ricci & C.E. Roggia (2008): L’interfaccia lingua-testo. Natura e funzioni dell’articolazione informativa dell’enunciato. Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, G. (1994): Labelling discourse: an aspect of nominal-group lexical cohesion, in: Coulthard, M. (ed.): Advances in Written Text Analysis. Routledge, London, pp. 83–101.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gernsbacher, M.A. (1991): Comprehending conceptual anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6,2, pp. 81–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Givón, T. (1983): Topic continuity in discourse: An introduction, in: Givón, T. (ed.): Topic Continuity in Discourse. A Quantitative Cross-Language Study. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 1–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Ruiz, R. (2008): Las nominalizaciones como estrategia de manipulación informativa en la noticia periodística: el caso de la anáfora conceptual, in: Olza Moreno, I., M. Casado Velarde & R. González Ruiz (eds): Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística (SEL). Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, pp. 247–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gualdo, R. (2007): L’italiano dei giornali. Carocci, Roma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jansen, H. (2003): Densità informativa. Tre parametri linguistico-testuali. Uno studio contrastivo inter- ed intralinguistico. Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010): Preposizionali, locuzioni, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 1149–1151.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ježek, E. (2005): Lessico. Classi di parole, strutture, combinazioni. Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (in stampa): The Lexicon: an Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Kęsik, M. (1989): La cataphore. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, G. (2001): L’anaphore associative. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korzen, I. (1996): L’articolo italiano fra concetto ed entità (2 voll.1). Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2000): Pragmatica testuale e sintassi nominale. Sull’esplicitezza pragma-testuale del sistema nominale in italiano e in danese, in: Korzen, I. & C. Marello (eds): Argomenti per una linguistica della traduzione. Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 81–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001): Anafore e relazioni anaforiche: un approccio pragmatico-cognitivo. Lingua Nostra, 62,3-4, pp. 107–126.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006a): On demonstrative determiners in anaphoric noun phrases, in: Nølke, H., I. Baron, H. Korzen, I. Korzen & H.H. Müller (eds): Grammatica. Festschrift in honour of Michael Herslund. Peter Lang, New York, pp. 261–277.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006b): Tipologia anaforica: il caso della cosiddetta ‘anafora evolutiva’. Studi di grammatica italiana, XXV1, pp. 323–357.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007): Linguistic typology, text structure and anaphors, in: Korzen, I. & L. Lundquist (eds): Comparing Anaphors. Between Sentences, Texts and Languages. Proceedings of the International Symposium held at the Copenhagen Business School September 1st–3rd 2005. Samfundslitteratur, Copenaghen, pp. 93–109.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2009): Anafora associativa: ulteriori associazioni, in: Venier, F. (a cura di): Tra pragmatica e linguistica testuale. Ricordando Maria-Elisabeth Conte. Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 307–326.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Korzen, I. & M. Buch-Kromann (2011): Anaphoric relations in the Copenhagen Dependency Treebanks, in: Dipper, S. & H. Zinsmeister (eds): Proceedings of the Workshop “Beyond Semantics: Corpus-Based Investigations of Pragmatic and Discourse Phenomena”, Göttingen, 23–25 february 2011. Bochumer Linguistische Arbeitsberichte, Göttingen, pp. 83–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruijff-Korbayová, I. & M. Steedman (2003): Discourse and information structure. Journal of Logic, Language and Information: Special Issue on Discourse and Information Structure, 12,3, pp. 249–259. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lala, L. (2004): I Due punti e l’organizzazione logico-argomentativa del testo, in: Ferrari, A. (a cura di): La lingua nel testo, il testo nella lingua. Istituto dell’Atlante Linguistico Italiano, Torino, pp. 143–164.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010a): Testo, tipi di, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 1490–1496.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010b): Incapsulatori, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 641–643.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010c): L’incapsulatore anaforico cosa nell’orale e nello scritto, in: Ferrari, A. & A.-M. De Cesare (a cura di): Il parlato nella scrittura italiana odierna. Riflessioni in prospettiva testuale. Peter Lang, Bern, pp. 57–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994): Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langer, S. (2004): A linguistic test battery for support verb constructions. Lingvisticae Investigationes, 27,2, pp. 171–184. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lepri, S. (1999): Professione giornalista. (2nd ed.). Etas Libri, Milano.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, W.J.M. (1989): Speaking. From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Löbner, S. (1987): Natural language and generalised quantifier theory, in: Gärdenfors, P. (ed.): Generalized Quantifiers. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 93–108. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundquist, L. (2009): L’anaphore résomptive. Navigation textuelle et comparaison discursive, in: Venier, F. (a cura di): Tra pragmatica e linguistica testuale: ricordando Maria-Elisabeth Conte. Edizioni dell’Orso, Alessandria, pp. 379–399.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977): Semantics (2 voll.1). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mastrofini, R. (2004): Classi di costruzioni a verbo supporto in italiano: implicazioni semantico-sintattiche nel paradigma V + N. Studi Italiani di Linguistica Teorica e Applicata, XXXIII, 3, pp. 371–398.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, J.-C. (1982): Ordres et raisons de langue. Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mortara Garavelli, B. (2003): Prontuario di punteggiatura. Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murialdi, P. (1975): Come si legge un giornale. Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palermo, M. (1995): I manuali redazionali e la norma dell’italiano scritto contemporaneo. Studi linguistici italiani, XXI1, pp. 88–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2013): Linguistica testuale dell’italiano. Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panunzi, A. (2010): Copula, in: Simone, R. (a cura di): Enciclopedia dell’Italiano Treccani. Treccani, Roma, pp. 297–299.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papuzzi, A. (2003): Professione giornalista. Tecniche e regole di un mestiere. Donzelli, Roma.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pecorari, F. (2014a): Ai confini dell’incapsulazione anaforica: strategie incapsulative non prototipiche, in: Pîrvu, E. (a cura di): Discorso e cultura nella lingua e nella letteratura italiana . Atti del V Convegno internazionale di italianistica dell’Università di Craiova, 20–21 settembre 2013. Cesati, Firenze, pp. 257–269.
. (2015): Incapsulatori anaforici e discorso riportato nell’italiano giornalistico: sfruttamenti coesivi della dimensione enunciativa, in: Miecznikowski, J., M. Casoni, S. Christopher, A. Kamber, E.M. Pandolfi & A. Rocci (a cura di): Norme linguistiche in contesto / Sprachnormen in Kontext / Normes langagières en contexte / Language Norms in Context. Actes du colloque VALS-ASLA 2014 (Lugano, 12–14 février 2014), Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, numéro spécial (3 voll.), vol. I1, pp. 227–244.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prada, M. (2003): Lingua e web, in: Bonomi, I., A. Masini & S. Morgana (a cura di): La lingua italiana e i mass media. Carocci, Roma, pp. 249–289.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prandi, M. (2002): Sulla frontiera tra frase e testo: prospettive di analisi, in: Jansen, H., P. Polito, L. Schøsler & E. Strudsholm (a cura di): L’infinito e oltre. Omaggio a Gunver Skytte. Odense University Press, Odense, pp. 391–407.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006): Le regole e le scelte. Introduzione alla grammatica italiana. UTET, Torino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reichler-Béguelin, M.-J. (1988): Anaphore, cataphore et mémoire discursive. Pratiques, 571, pp. 15–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sabatini, F. (1985): L’»italiano dell’uso medio»: una realtà tra le varietà linguistiche italiane, in: Holtus, G. & E. Radtke (a cura di): Gesprochenes Italienisch in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Narr, Tübingen, pp. 154–184.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1999): ‘Rigidità-esplicitezza’ vs ‘elasticità-implicitezza’: possibili parametri massimi per una tipologia dei testi, in: Skytte, G. & F. Sabatini (a cura di): Linguistica testuale comparativa. In memoriam Maria-Elisabeth Conte. Museum Tusculanum Press, Copenhagen, pp. 141–172.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salvi, G. (1991): Le frasi copulative, in: Renzi, L., G. Salvi & A. Cardinaletti (a cura di): Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione. Il Mulino, Bologna (3 voll.), vol. II1 ( I sintagmi verbale, aggettivale, avverbiale. La subordinazione ), pp. 163–189.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J.R. (1969): Speech acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simone, R. (1990a): Fondamenti di linguistica. Laterza, Roma-Bari.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1990b): Effetto copia e effetto quasi-copia. AIΩN. Annali del Dipartimento di Studi del Mondo Classico e del Mediterraneo Antico, 121, pp. 69–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonon, D. (2002): La notizia, in: Bruni, F. & T. Raso (a cura di): Manuale dell’italiano professionale. Teoria e didattica. Zanichelli, Bologna, pp. 92–99.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Deemter, K. & R. Kibble (2000): On coreferring: Coreference in MUC and related annotation schemes. Computational Linguistics, 26,4, pp. 629–637. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vieira, R. & M. Poesio (2000): An empirically-based system for processing definite descriptions. Computational Linguistics, 26,4, pp. 539–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vieira, R. & S. Teufel (1997): Towards resolution of bridging descriptions, in: Proceedings of the 35th Joint Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Madrid, pp. 522–524.
Wandruszka, M. (1975): Repetitio e variatio, in: AA.VV.: Attualità della retorica. Atti del I Convegno italo-tedesco (Bressanone 1973). Liviana, Padova, pp. 101–111.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werlich, E. (1976): A Text Grammar of English. Quelle & Meyer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zampese, L. (2005): La struttura informativa degli articoli di cronaca: natura e funzioni dell’Unità di Quadro, in: Ferrari, A. (a cura di): Rilievi. Le gerarchie semantico-pragmatiche di alcuni tipi di testo. Cesati, Firenze, pp. 173–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue