Article published In: Revue Romane
Vol. 49:1 (2014) ► pp.32–52
Two suppletive adjectives in Megleno-Romanian
Published online: 27 May 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.49.1.02mai
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.49.1.02mai
This study involves the existence in Megleno-Romanian dialects of a lexically suppletive distinction between singular and plural forms of the adjectives meaning ‘small’ and ‘big’. The phenomenon has gone largely unnoticed both by comparative Romance linguists and by morphological theorists yet it is both typologically surprising and theoretically significant. Analysis of a remarkably similar phenomenon in mainland Scandinavian languages led Börjars and Vincent (2011) to propose a considerably attenuated version of Maiden’s claim (2004) that lexical synonymy can drive the diachronic emergence of suppletion. My close investigation of the the source of the suppletion in Megleno-Romanian, and consideration of the Scandinavian facts in the light of the Megleno-Romanian data, will show that in fact the emergence of suppletion in just these adjectives constitutes excellent evidence for the claim that lexical synonymy favours suppletion.
Keywords: size adjectives, plurals, Megleno-Romanian, synonymy, suppletion, Romanian dialects
References (53)
Aski, J. (1995): Verbal suppletion: An analysis of Italian, French, and Spanish to go. Linguistics, 331, pp. 403-432.
Börjars, K. & N. Vincent (2011): The pre-conditions for suppletion, in: Galani, A., G. Hicks & G. Toulas (eds.) Morphology and its interfaces. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 239-265.
Bybee, J. (1985): Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Candrea, I.-A., O. Densuşianu & T. Sperantia (eds.) (1908): Graiul nostru. Texte din toate părţile locuite de români. II. Socec, Bucharest.
Cappellaro, C. (2011): History and development of third person pronouns in Italo-Romance. D. Phil. Thesis, University of Oxford.
Cinque, G. (2005): The dual source of adjectives and phrasal movement in the Romance DP. MS, University of Venice.
Corbett, G., A. Hippisley, D. Brown & Marriott, P. (2001): Frequency, regularity and the paradigm: A perspective from Russian on a complex relation, in: Bybee, J. & P. Hopper (eds.): Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure [Typological Studies in Language 45]. John Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 201–226.
DLR = Iordan, Iorgu, Coteanu, Ion, Graur, Alexandru (eds.) (1965): Dicţionarul limbii române. Academia Republicii Populare Romîne, Institutul de Lingvistică din Bucureti, Bucharest.
Heath, J. (1981): Basic materials in Mara: Grammar, texts and dictionary. Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University, Canberra.
Jørgensen, A.R. (2011): The plural of bihan, byhan ‘little, small’ in Breton and Cornish. Handout from conference Indo-European Matters Even More
, University of Copenhagen, October, 2011.
. (2012): The plural of middle and early modern Breton bihan. Handout from conference Building Blocks of Breton Grammar
, Philipps University of Marburg, April, 2012.
Juge, M. (1999): On the rise of suppletion in verbal paradigms, in: Chang, S., L. Liaw & Ruppenhofer, J. (eds.):
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society
. BLS, Berkeley, pp. 183-94.
Kahl, T. (2006): Islamizarea vlahilor megleniţi meglenoromâni. Satul Nânti (Notia) şi “nântinets” în Turcia de azi, in: Istoria aromânilor. Tritonic, Bucharest, pp. 183-210.
Ledgeway, A. (2011): Syntactic and morphosyntactic typology and change, in: Maiden, M., J.C. Smith & Ledgeway, A. (eds.): The Cambrige history of the romance languages I. Structures. CUP, Cambridge, pp. 382-471.
Maiden, M. (2001): A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441-464.
. (2004): When lexemes become allomorphs: on the genesis of suppletion. Folia Linguistica, 381, pp. 227-256.
. (2006): Accommodating synonymy. How some Italo-Romance verbs react to lexical and morphological borrowings, in: Tosi, A. & A.-L. Lepschy (eds.): Rethinking languages in contact: The case of Italian. Legenda, Oxford, pp. 87-98.
Maiden, M. & C. Robustelli (2007): A reference grammar of modern Italian. (2nd ed.). Hodder, London.
OLD = Glare, P. (ed.) (2012): Oxford Latin Dictionary. (2nd ed.). OUP, Oxford.
Papahagi, T. (1974): Dicționarul dialectului aromân general și etimologic. Editura Academiei Republicii Socialiste România, Bucharest.
Rothe, W. (1957): Einführung in die historische Laut- und Formenlehre des Rumänischen. Niemeyer, Halle.
Saramandu, N. (2005): Atlasul lingvistic român pe regiuni: sinteză. Editura Academiei Române, Bucharest.
Cited by (6)
Cited by six other publications
Bach, Xavier
Kim, Ronald I.
Nurmio, Silva
2017. The development and typology of number suppletion in adjectives. Diachronica 34:2 ► pp. 127 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
