Article published In: Revue Romane
Vol. 57:1 (2022) ► pp.86–115
Articles linguistiques
Overlapping subjunctive forms in Gallo- and Ibero-Romance verb paradigms
Published online: 28 October 2020
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.20009.esh
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.20009.esh
Abstract
In several varieties of Catalan, Valencian and Occitan, inflectional exponents originating in the imperfect
subjunctive (reflex of Latin pluperfect subjunctive) are analogically extended into the first and second person plural present
subjunctive forms, resulting in syncretism between present and imperfect subjunctive forms for the relevant persons. The scope and
directionality of such extensions are remarkably consistent, and are indicative of a change driven by the structure of the
inflectional paradigm in the relevant varieties. A significant consequence of this development, which fits into a general Romance
tendency for analogical remodelling of first and second person plural forms, is alignment between previously overlapping
distributions of stem allomorphs and stress placement, and thus greater predictability of inflected forms.
Keywords: syncretism, analogical change, verb inflection, Occitan, Catalan, Valencian
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Present and imperfect subjunctives in the diachrony of Romance metamorphomes
- 2.1Romance metamorphomes involving the present and imperfect subjunctives
- 2.2Clash, coalescence and shared exponents
- 3.Analogical extension of root allomorphs and stem formatives
- 3.1Spread of a thematic velar consonant
- 3.2Summary
- 4.Importation and syncretism
- 4.1Importation with syncretism, affecting prs.sbjv.1pl and prs.sbjv.2pl
- 4.1.1Overview of importation with syncretism
- 4.1.2Interaction with conjugation class and root allomorphy
- 4.1.3Existing approaches to the actuation and directionality of importation with syncretism
- 4.2Importation without syncretism, affecting prs.sbjv.1pl and prs.sbjv.2pl
- 4.3Importation and category loss
- 4.4Summary
- 4.1Importation with syncretism, affecting prs.sbjv.1pl and prs.sbjv.2pl
- 5.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
References
References (56)
Ackerman, F., J. P. Blevins & R. Malouf. (2009): Parts and wholes: Implicative patterns in inflectional paradigms, in: Blevins, J. P. & J. Blevins (eds.): Analogy in grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 54–82.
Alcover, A. & F. de B. Moll. (1929–1933): La flexió verbal en els dialectes catalans. Anuari de l’Oficina romànica de lingüística i literatura 21, pp. 79–184, 31, pp. 73–168, 41, pp. 9–104, 51, pp. 9–72.
Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett. (2005): The Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Study of Syncretism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Bonami, O. (2014): La structure fine des paradigmes de flexion. HDR dissertation, Université Paris Diderot, Paris.
Bonami, O. & G. Boyé (2002): Suppletion and stem dependency in inflectional morphology, in: Van Eynde, F., L. Hellan & D. Beerman (eds.): Proceedings of the HPSG ’01 Conference. SCLI Publications, Stanford, pp. 51–70.
(2003): Supplétion et classes flexionnelles dans la conjugaison du français. Langages, 1521, pp. 102–126.
Brun-Trigaud, G. (1990): Le Croissant: le concept et le mot. Doctoral dissertation, Université Lyon III, Lyon.
Camproux, C. (1962): Essai de géographie linguistique du Gévaudan. Presses Universitaires de France, Montpellier.
Casagrande, S. (2011): L’unité et la diversité des systèmes verbaux en langue d’oc et dans les aires limitrophes. Essai de reconstruction. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Nice, Nice.
Enger, H.-O. (2014): Reinforcement in inflection classes: Two cues may be better than one. Word Structure, 7, 2, pp. 153–181.
Esher, L. (2015): Morphomes and predictability in the history of Romance perfects. Diachronica, 32, 4, pp. 494–529.
(2016): Morphomic distribution of augments in varieties of Occitan. Revue Romane, 51, 2, pp. 271–306.
(2020): Syncretism and metamorphomes in northern Occitan (Lemosin) varieties, in: Wolfe, S. & M. Maiden (eds.): Variation and change in Gallo-Romance grammar. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 364–384.
Guerrero, A. (2011): Verbal inflection in central Catalan: A realisational analysis. Lingue e linguaggio, 101, pp. 265–282.
(2014): Analyse thématique de la flexion en catalan central standard. Doctoral dissertation, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse.
Hinzelin, M.-O. (2011a): Syncretism and suppletion in Gallo-Romance verb paradigms, in: Maiden, M., J. C. Smith, M. Goldbach & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 287–310.
(2011b): La morphologie verbale du nord-occitan dans l’ensemble gallo-roman, in: Rieger, A. & D. Sumien (eds.): L’Occitanie invitée de l’Euregio. Liège 1981 – Aix-la-Chapelle 2008. Bilan et perspectives. Actes du Neuvième Congrès International de l’AIEO, Aix-la-Chapelle, 24–31 août 2008. Vol. II. Shaker, Aachen, pp. 719–732.
(2012): Verb morphology gone astray: Syncretism patterns in Gallo-Romance, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 55–81.
Juge, M. (2013): Analogy as a source of suppletion, in: Kikusawa, R. & L. A. Reid (eds.): Historical Linguistics 2011. Selected papers from the 20th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Osaka, 25–30 July 2011. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 175–197.
Koschwitz, E. (1973 [1894]): Grammaire historique de la langue des Félibres. Slatkine Reprints, Genève.
Maiden, M. (2000): Di un cambiamento intramorfologico: Origini del tipo dissi dicesti ecc., nell’italoromanzo. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 85, 2, pp. 137–171.
(2001): A strange affinity: perfecto y tiempos afines. Bulletin of Hispanic Studies, 581, pp. 441–464.
(2004): Verb augments and meaninglessness in Romance morphology. Studi di grammatica italiana, 221, pp. 1–61.
(2009a): From pure phonology to pure morphology. The reshaping of the Romance verb. Recherches linguistiques de Vincennes, 381, pp. 45–82.
(2009b): Un capitolo di morfologia storica del romeno: preterito i tempi affini. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, 1251, pp. 273–309.
(2012): A paradox? The morphological history of the Romance present subjunctive, in: Gaglia, S. & M.-O. Hinzelin (eds.): Inflection and Word Formation in Romance Languages. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 27–54.
(2013): The Latin ‘third stem’ and its Romance descendants. Diachronica, 301, pp. 492–530.
(2016a): Morphomes, in: Ledgeway, A. & M. Maiden (eds.): The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 708–721.
(2016b): Some lessons from history. Morphomes in diachrony, in: Luís, A. & R. Bermúdez-Otero (eds.): The Morphome Debate. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 33–63.
Martin, G. & B. Moulin. (2007): Grammaire provençale et cartes linguistiques, deuxième édition revue et corrigée. Comitat Sestian d’Estudis Occitans, Aix-en-Provence.
Meul, C. (2010): The intra-paradigmatic distribution of the infix -I/ESC- from Latin to Modern Romance: morphomic patterning and beyond. Morphology, 201, pp. 1–40.
(2013). The Romance reflexes of the Latin infixes -I/ESC- and -IDI-: restructuring and remodeling processes. Buske, Hamburg.
Milizia, P. (2016): Sincretismo compensativo ed esponenza semiseparata in alcuni paradigmi verbali del dominio italo-romanzo centromeridionale. Archivio Glottologico Italiano, 101, 1, pp. 88–119.
O’Neill, P. (2014): The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology, 241, pp. 25–70.
Quint, N. (ms.): Azérables: morphologie verbale. Unpublished fieldwork notes.
Ronjat, J. (1937): Grammaire istorique des parlers provençaux modernes, vol. III. Société des Langues Romanes, Montpellier.
Round, E. R. (2015): Rhizomorphomes, meromorphomes, and metamorphomes, in: Baerman, M., D. Brown & G. Corbett (eds.): Understanding and measuring morphological complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 29–52.
Savinian [= Lhermitte, J.] (1978 [1882]): Grammaire provençale: précis historique de la langue d’oc. Marcel Petit, Raphèle-lès-Arles.
Sibille, J. (2015): Description de l’occitan parlé à Sénaillac-Lauzès (Lot) et dans les communes voisines. Lambert Lucas, Limoges.
Smith, J. C. (2013): The morphome as a gradient phenomenon: Evidence from Romance, in: Cruschina, S., M. Maiden & J. C. Smith (eds.): The Boundaries of Pure Morphology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 247–261.
Wheeler, M. (1993): Changing inflection: verbs in North West Catalan, in: Mackenzie, D. & I. Michael (eds.): Hispanic Linguistic Studies in honour of F. W. Hodcraft. Dolphin, Llangrannog, pp. 171–206.
Cited by (5)
Cited by five other publications
Herce, Borja & Bogdan Pricop
Round, Erich, Louise Esher & Sacha Beniamine
ESHER, LOUISE
Esher, Louise
2025. Dissimilatory constraints discriminate between variants in analogical change. In Historical Linguistics 2022 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 369], ► pp. 110 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
