Cover not available

Article published In: Revue Romane
Vol. 54:2 (2019) ► pp.257–277

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Articles Linguistiques

Degrees of grammaticalization and measure constructions in Italian

ORCiD logo with link | University of Pavia
Published online: 5 February 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.16015.gia
Abstract
Against the background of recent debate on Grammaticalization Theory, this study will provide an overview of some Italian quantifying expressions whose original head is a measure noun. The binominal expressions analysed indicate a quantity, either large or small; as such, they can be substituted by canonical quantifiers such as molto “much” or un po’ “a little”. I claim that their functioning as quantifier is the result of a process of grammaticalization, through which the original head noun of the complex construction has been reanalysed as quantifier. At a closer look, however, the degrees of grammaticalization appear different for specific items, as well as the sources providing the recruitment of new quantifiers. The specific collocational patterns that trigger the pragmatic inferences prior to their semanticization and reanalysis have not as yet received sufficient attention. Adopting a diachronic Construction Grammar approach, the paper discusses various case studies and provides a number of descriptive and theoretical insights concerning the rise of distinct grammaticalization patterns.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical and methodological questions
    • 2.1Data
  • 3.The construction un sacco di between lexical uses and grammaticalization paths
  • 4.Other size nouns reanalyzed as quantifiers
    • 4.1 Un mucchio di
    • 4.2 Un monte di, una montagna di “a mountain of”, “a heap of”
    • 4.3 Un mare di / una marea di
    • 4.4 Una valanga di
    • 4.5A look at historical attestations
  • 5.Small size nouns
    • 5.1 Briciolo and briciola
    • 5.2Further cases
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (32)
References
Aarts, B. (1998): Binominal noun phrases in English. Transactions of the Philological Society, 961, pp. 117–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, J., E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea (2015): Diachronic Construction Grammar, Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brems, L. (2007): The grammaticalization of small size nouns. Reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics. 34 (4), pp. 293–324. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010): Size nouns constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics, 14.1, pp. 83–109 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clerck, B. & T. Colleman (2013): From noun to intensifier: massa and massa’s in (Flemish) varieties of Dutch. Language Sciences. 361, pp. 147–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Clerck, B. & L. Brems (2016): Size noun matter: a closer look at mass(es) of and extended uses of SNs. Language Sciences, 531, pp. 160–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denison, D. (2002): History of the sort of construction family. Paper presented at ICCG2: Second International Conference on Construction Grammar, Helsinki
(2005): The grammaticalisations of sort of, kind of and type of in English. Paper presented at New Reflections on Grammaticalization 3, University of Santiago de Compostela.
Diewald, G. (2002): A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization, in: Wischer, I. & G. Diewald (Eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 103–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A. (2015): Un sacco di…. ed altre espressioni di quantità nella prospettiva della grammaticalizzazione, in: Busà, M. G. & S. Gesuato (a cura di): Lingue e Contesti. Studi in onore di Alberto M. Mioni. Padova: CLEUP, pp. 583–596.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giacalone Ramat, A., C. Mauri & P. Molinelli (2013): Synchrony and diachrony. A dynamic interface. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (2006): Constructions at work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B. (2002): On the role of context in grammaticalization, in: Wisher, I. & G. Diewald (Eds.): New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Amsterdam, New York: John Benjamins, pp. 83–101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, B., U. Claudi & F. Hünnemeyer (1991): Grammaticalization. A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N. (2004): Lexicalization and grammaticalization: Opposite or orthogonal? in: Bisang, W., N. Himmelmann & B. Wiemer (Eds): What Makes Grammaticalization? A Look from its Fringes and its Components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 19–40.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, P. H. & E. C. Traugott (2003): Grammaticalization, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Israel, M. (2004): The pragmatics of polarity, in: Horn, L. R. & G. Ward: The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 701–722.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, C. (1995 [1982]): Thoughts on grammaticalization: a Programmatic Sketch. Arbeiten des Kölner Universalien Projektes, Nr. 48. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Reprinted: München, 1995: LINCOM EUROPAGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masini, F. (2016): Binominal constructions in Italian of the NP1-di-NP2 type: towards a typology of Light Noun Constructions. Language Sciences, 531, pp. 99–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1912): L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia 12, no.26. Reprinted in Meillet, A. (1958): Linguistique historique et linguistique générale, Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, W. (2016): Type-noun binominals in four Romance languages. Language Sciences, 531, pp. 136–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mirto, I. & H. Necker (2007): Complex Nominal Determiners, in: Ramat, P. & E. Roma (Eds.): Europe and the Mediterranean as Linguistic Areas. Convergencies from a historical and typological perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 215–243. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech & J. Svartvik (1985): A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rohlfs, G. (1969): Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. (2008): The grammaticalization of NP of NP constructions, in: Bergs, A. & G. Diewald (Eds.), Constructions and Language Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010): (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification. A reassessment, in: Davidse, K., L. Vandelanotte & H. Cuyckens (Eds.): Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and grammaticalization. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 29–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2015): Toward a coherent account of grammatical constructionalization, in: Barðdal, J., E. Smirnova, L. Sommerer & S. Gildea: Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 51–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & R. B. Dasher (2002): Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, E. C. & G. Trousdale (2010): Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trousdale, G. (2014): On the relationship between grammaticalization and constructionalization. Folia Linguistica, 48/2, pp. 557–77 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verveckken, K. (2016): Binominal quantifiers in Spanish: syntagmatic and paradigmatic analogy in interaction. Language Sciences, 531, pp. 114–135 Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Mengden, F. & H. J. Simon (2014): What is it then, this Grammaticalization? Folia Linguistica, 48/2, pp. 347–360Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Cotta Ramusino, Paola Maria & Tatsiana Maiko
2025. Binominal Constructions of Small Quantity in Russian, Belarusian, and Ukrainian*. Scando-Slavica 71:1 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo
Feltgen, Quentin
2025. Entre monticule et grammaire : histoire contrariée d’un quantifieur. Linx 89 DOI logo
Kolyaseva, Alena
2023. From size measurement to simultaneity: the case of Russian po mere ‘by measure’. Language Sciences 95 ► pp. 101513 ff. DOI logo
Herda, Damian
2022. On the Gradience of English Size Nouns: frequency, productivity, and expansion . Baltic Journal of English Language, Literature and Culture 12 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Herda, Damian
2025. On the Grammaticalization of Polish Partitive Nouns into Vague Quantifiers: A Corpus Study. Studies in Polish Linguistics 20:2 ► pp. 79 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue