Cover not available

Article published In: Les prépositions complexes dans les langues romanes
Edited by Benjamin Fagard, José Pinto De Lima and Dejan Stosic
[Revue Romane 54:1] 2019
► pp. 3961

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (23)
Bibliographie
Anscombre, J.-C. (2007): Les indicateurs aspectuels de déroulement processif : en cours de, en passe de, en train de, en voie de . Cahiers de lexicologie, 901, pp. 41–74.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baldinger, K. (1968): Die Bezeichnungen für ‘Weg’ im Galloromanischen, in: Baehr, R. & K. Wais (éds.): Serta Romanica. Festschrift für Gerhard Rohlfs zum 75. Geburtstag. Max Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 89–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boye, K. & P. Harder. (2012): A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88,1, pp. 1–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Mulder, W. & D. Amiot. (2013): En : de la préposition à la construction. Langue française, 178,2, pp. 21–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Smet, H. & O. Fischer. (2017): The role of analogy in language change. Supporting constructions, in: Hundt, M., S. Mollin & S. E. Pfenninger (éds.): The Changing English Language. Psycholinguistic perspectives. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 240–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Detges, U. (1996): Nominalprädikate. Eine Valenztheoretische Untersuching der französischen Funktionsverbgefüge des Paradigmas « être Präposition Nomen » und verwandter Konstruktionen. Niemeyer, Tübingen. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1999): Wie entsteht Grammatik ? Kognitive und pragmatische Determinanten der Grammatikalisierung von Tempusmarkern, in: Lang, J. & I. Neumann-Holzschuh (éds.): Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen. Niemeyer, Tübingen, pp. 31–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Do-Hurinville, D. T. (2010): Etude sémantique et syntaxique de en voie de (nom), en voie de (verbe) . Le français moderne, 78,2, pp. 236–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Godefroy, Frédéric. (1891–1902): Dictionnaire de l’ancienne langue française du IXe siècle au XVe siècle. Vieweg, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, A. E. (1995): Constructions : A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006): Constructions at Work : The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gougenheim, G. (1971): Étude sur les périphrases verbales de la langue française. Librairie A.-G. Nizet, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grevisse, M. (1980): Le Bon usage, 11e édition. Duculot, Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilpert, M. (2014): Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh University Press, Edimbourg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, P., K. Davidse & T. Van Rompaey. (2012): On ways of being on the way. Lexical, complex preposition and aspect marker uses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 17,2, pp. 229–258. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, M., J.-C. Pellat & R. Rioul. (1994): Grammaire méthodique du français. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Robert Historique: Rey (2000): Le dictionnaire historique de la langue française. Le Robert, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schøsler, L. (2004). « Tu eps l’as deit » / « Tut s’en vat declinant »: Grammaticalisation et dégrammaticalisation dans le système verbal du français illustrées par deux évolutions, celle du passé composé et celle du progressif. Aemilianense, 11, pp. 517–568.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Togeby, K. (1982): Grammaire française. Akademisk Forlag, Copenhague.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderheyden, A. & W. De Mulder. (2008): Grammaticalisation et évolution du verbe aller : inférence, métonymie ou métaphore?, in: Fagard, B., S. Prévost, B. Combettes & O. Bertrand (éds.): Evolutions en français : études de linguistique diachronique. Peter Lang, Berne, pp. 21–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Werner, E. (1980): Die Verbalperiphrase im Mittelfranzösischen. Eine semantisch-syntaktische Analyse. Lang, Francfort.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilmet, M. (1997): Grammaire critique du français. Duculot, Louvain-la-Neuve.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Feltgen, Quentin
2019. Diachronic Emergence of Zipf-like Patterns in Construction-Specific Frequency Distributions: A Quantitative Study of the Way Too Construction. Lexis :16 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue