Cover not available

Article published In: Models of Discourse Units in Romance Languages
Edited by Margarita Borreguero Zuloaga, Vahram Atayan and Sybille Große
[Revue Romane 53:1] 2018
► pp. 6–29

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the syntax of spoken French

Government-Units and Utterance-Units

 | Parole et Langage
Published online: 10 August 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rro.00004.sab
Abstract
This paper gives an account of the research carried out by the Groupe Aixois de Recherche en Syntaxe (GARS, Aix-Marseille University), in the field of spoken French description. Our framework explicitly states the need for two independent but related levels of grammatical description, namely the microsyntactic and macrosyntactic levels. Elaborating a twofold model has allowed us to propose a descriptive method differing from traditional sentence-based analyses, which raise considerable difficulties, especially in the domain of spoken language description. Regarding the “maximal-units” of syntactic description, our framework suggests that two different kinds of units should be postulated: Government-Units and Utterance-Units. The paper illustrates the distinction between the micro- and macro-syntactic components by introducing examples mostly drawn from spoken French corpora.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.On the homology between verbs and sentences
  • 3.Dependency relations and utterance organization
    • 3.1Microsyntax and Government-Units
    • 3.2Macrosyntax and Utterance-Units
      • 3.2.1Unilateral groupings
        • 3.2.1.1Nucleus and satellites
        • 3.2.1.2Introduced nucleus
      • 3.2.2Bilateral groupings
      • 3.2.3Parallel structuring
  • 4.Overlap between macrosyntactic configurations and microsyntactic relationships
    • 4.1Extraction of a governed element as a Nuclus-unit
    • 4.2Extraction of a governed element as a Satellite-unit
    • 4.3Realization of a GU as a sequence of Nucleus-units
  • 5.Synthesis and concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Bally, C. (1932) : Linguistique française et linguistique générale. Leroux, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benzitoun, C. (2006) : Description morphosyntaxique du mot quand en français contemporain. Dissertation, Université de Provence.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D., S. Johansson, G. Leech, S. Conrad, E. Finegan. (1999) : Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman, London.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bilger, M., J. -M. Debaisieux, J. Deulofeu, F. Sabio. (2013) : Le cadre descriptif, in : Debaisieux, J. -M. (dir.), pp. 61–98.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C. (2002) : Macro-syntaxe et micro-syntaxe : les dispositifs de la rection verbale, in : Andersen, H. L. & H. Nølke (eds.) : Macro-syntaxe et macro-sémantique. Peter Lang, Berne, pp. 95–115.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2005) : Le corpus de français parlé du GARS, Groupe Aixois de Recherches en Syntaxe, in : Tradizione & Innovazione. Il parlato: teoria – corpora – linguistica dei corpora. Atti del VI Convegno Internazionale della SILFI. Franco Cesati, Firenze, pp. 57–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010) : Le français – Usages de la langue parlée. Peeters, Paris / Louvain.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., M. Bilger, C. Rouget, K. van den Eynde, P. Mertens. (1990) : Le français parlé, études grammaticales. Éditions du CNRS, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., J. Deulofeu, J. Stéfanini, K. van den Eynde. (1984) : L’approche pronominale et son application au français. Paris, SELAF.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blanche-Benveniste, C., C. Rouget, F. Sabio. (2002) : Choix de textes de français parlé, 36 extraits. Champion, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blasco-Dulbecco, M. (1999) : Les dislocations en français contemporain. Étude syntaxique. Champion, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cresti, E. (1995) : Speech acts and informational units, in : Fava, E. (ed.) : Speech acts and Linguistic research. Proceedings of the Symposium. State University at Buffalo, Padova, Nemo, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debaisieux, J. -M. (2004) : Les conjonctions de subordination : mots de grammaire ou mots de discours : le cas de parce que . Revue de sémantique et pragmatique, 15/161, pp. 51–67.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013) : Autour de parce que et de puisque , in : Debaisieux, J. -M. (dir.), pp. 185–247.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(dir.) (2013) : Analyses linguistiques sur corpus. Subordination et insubordination en français. Lavoisier / Hermes Sciences, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DELIC (2004) : Présentation du Corpus de référence du français parlé. Recherches sur le français parlé, 181, pp. 14–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deulofeu, J. (1991) : La notion de dépendance syntaxique dans l’approche pronominale. L’information grammaticale, 501, pp. 19–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2013) : L’approche macrosyntaxique : sources et controverses, in : Debaisieux, J. -M. (dir.), pp. 427–497.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016) : La macrosyntaxe comme moyen de tracer la limite entre organisation grammaticale et organisation du discours. Modèles linguistiques. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eynde, K. van den & Mertens, P. (2003) : La valence – l’approche pronominale et son application au lexique verbal. French Language Studies, 131, pp. 63–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flaux, N. (1997) : La grammaire. Coll. Que sais-je, PUF, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gardes-Tamine, J. (1988) : La grammaire 2. Armand Colin, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Groupe de Fribourg (2012) : Grammaire de la période. Peter Lang, Berne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Houellebecq, M. (2001): Plateforme. Flammarion, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lafontaine, F. (2015) : Etude micro- et macro-syntaxique de quelques conjonctions à sémantisme oppositif : alors que, bien que, tandis que, au lieu que. Dissertation, Aix-Marseille Université.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lacheret, A., S. Kahane, J. Beliao, A. Dister, K. Gerdes et al. (2014) : Rhapsodie : un Treebank annoté pour l’étude de l’interface syntaxe-prosodie en français parlé. 4e Congrès Mondial de Linguistique Française, pp. 2675–2689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lambrecht, K. (1994) : Information Structure and Sentence Form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, G. (2000) : Grammars of Spoken English: New Outcomes of Corpus-Oriented Research. Language Learning, 50, 4, pp. 675–724. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miller, J. & R. Weinert. (1998) : Spontaneous spoken language. Syntax and Discourse. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morel, M. -A. & L. Danon-Boileau. (1998) : Grammaire de l’intonation. L’exemple du français. Ophrys, Gap / Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perrot, J. (1993) : Structure informative et structure syntaxique. BSL, 88, 1, pp. 49–63.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pietrandrea, P., S. Kahane, A. Lacheret, F. Sabio. (2014) : The notion of sentence and other discourse units in corpus annotation, in : Rasso, T. et H. Mello (eds.) : Spoken corpora and linguistic studies. Benjamins, Amsterdam, pp. 331–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riegel, M., J. -C. Pellat, R. Rioul. (1994) : Grammaire méthodique du français. PUF, Paris.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2011) : Syntaxe et organisation des énoncés, observations sur la grammaire du français parlé. HDR Dissertation, Aix-Marseille Université, unpublished.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(to appear) : About two clause-linkage strategies in French: groupings and parallel structuring. Discourse and interaction. Peter Lang, Berne.
Tanguy, N. (2010) : Étude des compléments différés à l’hral à l’interface syntaxe-prosodie. CMLF Proceedings, pp. 1415–1427.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verstraete, J. -C. (2007) : Rethinking the coordinate-subordinate dichotomy, Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin / New York. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Sabio, Frédéric, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud & Berthille Pallaud
2022. Le début des phrases en français parlé. TIPA. Travaux interdisciplinaires sur la parole et le langage :38 DOI logo
Gao, Jie & Jian Su
2021. Research on Machine Learning-Based Error Correction Algorithm for Spoken French. Security and Communication Networks 2021 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Sabio, Frédéric & Marie-Noëlle Roubaud
2018. The syntactic and discursive status ofc’est comme ça que(this is how) in spoken and written French. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 32 ► pp. 144 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue