In:Reflexive and Reflective Research Approaches in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Pejman Habibie and Richard D. Sawyer
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 8] 2025
► pp. 248–266
Chapter 14Contemporary Applied Linguistics Research
Between reflection and reflexivity
Published online: 3 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.14pri
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.14pri
Abstract
In this commentary, I will offer some thoughts on the preceding chapters and their contributions
to reflective and reflexive research in Applied Linguistics. We must, of course, first acknowledge that contemporary
Applied Linguistics is a multidisciplinary field — no longer confined to linguistics, nor reducible to second (i.e.,
additional or foreign) language acquisition or English Language
Teaching (ELT). I will begin with a brief historical snapshot
of developments across the field to locate this volume in relation to ongoing scholarly conversations. I then examine
some of the ways reflection and reflexivity have been defined and applied in qualitative inquiry, before concluding
with some suggestions for advancing both theory and practice.
Article outline
- Reflections on applied linguistics
- Four dialogic approaches
- Reflections on reflexivity
- First-order reflexivity
- Second-order reflexivity
- Reflexivity for…what?
- Reflexivity and research practices
- Reflexivity and educational institutions
- Reflexivity and society
- Concluding reflections
Notes References
References (64)
Ashmore, M. (1989). The
reflexive thesis: Wrighting sociology of scientific knowledge. The University of Chicago Press.
Avineri, N., & Martinez, D. C. (2021). Applied
linguists cultivating relationships for justice: An aspirational call to
action. Applied
Linguistics, 42(6), 1043–1054.
Back, L. (2007). Politics,
research and understanding. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative
research
practice (pp. 249–264). Sage.
Basturkmen, H., & Elder, C. (2004). The
practice of LSP. In A. Davies & C. Elder (Eds.). The
handbook of applied
linguistics (pp. 672–694). Blackwell.
Benesch, S., & Prior, M. T. (2023). Rescuing
“emotion labor” from (and for) language teacher emotion
research. System, 113, 1–10.
Block, D. (2007). The
rise of identity in SLA research, post Firth and Wagner (1997). The Modern
Language Journal, 91 [Focus
issue], 863–876.
Bochner, A. P., & Ellis, C. (2016). Evocative
autoethnography: Writing lives and telling
stories. Routledge.
Bygate, M. (2005). Applied
linguistics: A pragmatic discipline, a generic discipline? Applied
Linguistics, 26(4), 568–581.
Clegg, S. (1999). Professional
education, reflective practice and feminism. International Journal of Inclusive
Education, 3(2), 167–179.
Consoli, S. (2022). Life
capital: An epistemic and methodological lens for TESOL research. TESOL
Quarterly, 56(4), 1397–1409.
Consoli, S., & Ganassin, S. (2023). Reflexivity
in applied linguistics: Opportunities, challenges, and
suggestions. Routledge.
Coupland, N., Sarangi, S., & Candlin, C. (Eds.). (2001). Sociolinguistics
and social theory. Pearson.
Davies, B., Browne, G., Honan, E., Laws, C., Mueller-Rochstroh, Bendix Petersen, E. (2004). The
ambivalent practices of reflexivity. Qualitative
Inquiry, 10(3), 360–389.
De Costa, P. I. (Ed.). (2016). Ethics
in applied linguistics research: Language researcher
narratives. Routledge.
De Costa, P. I., & Norton, B. (2017). Introduction:
Identity, transdisciplinarity, and the good language teacher. The Modern
Language
Journal, 101(Supplement), 3–14.
Douglas Fir
Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a
multilingual world. Modern Language
Journal, 100 (Supplement), 19–47.
Edwards, J. (2021). Ethical
autoethnography: Is it possible? International Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 20, 1–7.
Haynes, K. (2012). Reflexivity
in qualitative research. In C. Cassell, & G. Symon (Eds.), The
practice of qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current
challenges (pp. 72–89). Sage.
Jamieson, M. K., Govaart, G. H., & Pownall, M. (2023). Reflexivity
in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner’s guide. Social and
Personality Psychology
Compass, 17(4).
Kenway, J., & McLeod, J. (2004). Bourdieu’s
reflexive sociology and ‘spaces of points of view’: whose reflexivity, which
perspective? British Journal of Sociology of
Education, 25(4), 525–544.
Kester, K. (2022). Global
citizenship education and peace education: Toward a postcritical
praxis. Educational philosophy and
theory, 55(1), 45–56.
Kubota, R. (2019). Confronting
epistemological racism, decolonizing scholarly knowledge: Race and gender in applied
linguistics. Applied
Linguistics, 41(5), 712–732.
Leung, C., Harris, R., & Rampton, B. (2004). Living
with inelegance in qualitative research, in B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical
pedagogies and language
learning (pp. 242–267). Cambridge University Press.
Li, S., & Prior, M. T. (2022). Research
methods in applied linguistics: A methodological imperative. Research Methods
in Applied
Linguistics, 1(1), 1–6.
Lynch, M. (2000). Against
reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory,
Culture &
Society, 17(3), 26–54.
Maton, K. (2003). Reflexivity,
relationism & research: Pierre Bourdieu and the epistemic conditions of social scientific
knowledge, Space &
Culture, 6, 52–65.
McKinley, J. & Rose, H. (Eds.) (2017). Doing
research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and
solutions. Routledge.
Motha, S. (2020). Is
an antiracist and decolonizing applied linguistics possible? Annual Review of
Applied
Linguistics, 40, 128–133.
Ortega, L. (2005). For
what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed
SLA. Modern Language
Journal, 89, 427–443.
(2017). New
CALL-SLA research interfaces for the 21st century: Towards equitable
multilingualism. Calico
Journal, 34(3), 285–316.
Pavlenko, A. (2007). Autobiographic
narratives as data in applied linguistics. Applied
Linguistics, 28(2), 163–188.
(2013). The
affective turn in SLA: From ‘affective factors’ to ‘language desire’ and ‘commodification of
affect.’ In D. Gabrys-Barker & J. Bielska (Eds.), The
affective dimension in second language
acquisition (pp. 3–28). Multilingual Matters.
Pennycook, A. (2017). The
cultural politics of English as an international language. Taylor & Francis.
Prior, M. T. (2019). Elephants
in the room: An “affective turn,” or just feeling our way? The Modern Language
Journal, 103, 517–527.
(2017). Managing
researcher dilemmas in narrative interview data and
analysis. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), Doing
research in applied linguistics: Realities, dilemmas, and
solutions (pp. 172–181). Routledge.
Prior, M. T., & Talmy, S. (2021). A
discursive constructionist approach to narrative in language teaching and learning
research. System, 102, 1–11.
Rosa, J., & Flores, N. (2017). Unsettling
race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in
Society, 46, 621–647.
Sharma, B. K. (2021). Reflexivity
in applied linguistics research in the tourism workplace. Applied
Linguistics, 42(2), 230–251.
Talmy, S. (2014). Toward
an interpretivist turn in L2 Studies: Reflexivity, the cognitive/social divide, and
beyond. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 36, 36–43.
Ushioda, E. (2020). Language
learning motivation: An ethical agenda for research. Oxford University Press.
Walsh, S., & Mann, S. (2017). Reflective
practice in English language teaching: Research-based principles and
practices. Taylor & Francis.
Walsh, W. D., & Mignolo, C. E. (2018). On
decoloniality: Concepts, analytics, and praxis. Duke University Press.
Warriner, D., & Bigelow, M. (2019). Critical
reflections on research methods: Power and equity in complex multilingual
contexts. Multilingual Matters.
Wei, L. (2023). Afterword.
Journey into applied linguistics: Reflecting on reflexivity and
positionality. In S. Consoli & S. Ganassin (Eds.), Reflexivity
in applied linguistics: Opportunities, challenges, and
suggestions (pp. 207–210). Routledge.
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
Consoli, Sal & Sara Ganassin
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
