In:Reflexive and Reflective Research Approaches in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Pejman Habibie and Richard D. Sawyer
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 8] 2025
► pp. 120–138
Chapter 7The role of duoethnography in critical ELT research
Reflexivity, ideology critique, and praxis
Published online: 3 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.07low
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.07low
Abstract
Duoethnography is an approach to research often associated with critical projects; that is, with research which is focused on issues of
discrimination, prejudice, and social justice. In recent years, such research has often been aligned theoretically
with post structuralism, which resists theory building,
and instead aims to question and deconstruct dominant power relations. However, there has been a recent move in
critical ELT research towards forms of critique associated with Marxism, critical realism, and critical theory. Building on this structural (re)turn, this chapter
explores the role duoethnography could play in a research program oriented around the post-Marxist critical theory of
the early Frankfurt School. Drawing on a conception of critical theory as a form of self-reflexive social science
focused on ideology critique and emancipatory praxis, this chapter explores how the dialogic nature of duoethnography
could be reconstituted as an engine for theoretical development and consciousness raising. It is suggested that through processes of
immanent critique, duoethnography could be used to evaluate the internal coherence of claims within a critical program
of research in ELT, as well as identifying starting points for ideology critique. Finally, the accessibility of
duoethnographic work is presented as a possible route for transforming research into praxis.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Duoethnography in ELT
- Critical ELT research
- Critical theory
- What role does duoethnography play?
- Reflexivity and critique of the claims of critical ELT
- Ideology critique
- Contributing to praxis
- Limitations and concerns
- Ethical issues
- Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (81)
Abromeit, J. (2011). Max
Horkheimer and the foundations of the Frankfurt School. Cambridge University Press.
Adorno, T. W. (2019). Philosophical
elements of a theory of
society. Polity. (Original work published
1964).
Ahmed, A., & Morgan, B. (2021). Postmemory
and multilingual identities in English language teaching: A duoethnography, The
Language Learning
Journal, 49(4), 483–498.
Antonio, R. (1981). Immanent
critique as the core of critical theory: Its origins and developments in Hegel, Marx and contemporary
thought. The British Journal of
Sociology, 32(3), 330–345.
Bailey, K. (2006). Marketing
the eikaiwa wonderland: Ideology, akogare, and gender alterity in English conversation school advertising in
Japan. Environment and Planning D: Society and
Space, 24, 105–130.
Best, B., Bonefeld, W., & O’Kane, C. (2018). Introduction:
Key texts and contributions to a critical theory of
society. In B. Best, W. Bonefeld, & C. O’Kane (Eds.), The
Sage handbook of Frankfurt School critical
theory (pp.1–16). Sage.
Borg, S. (2009). English
language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied
Linguistics, 30(3), 358–388.
Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Teacher
development in a global profession: An autoethnography. TESOL
Quarterly, 46(2), 258–279.
Copley, K. (2018). Neoliberalism
and ELT coursebook content. Critical Inquiry in Language
Studies, 15(1), 43–62.
Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative
theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL
Quarterly, 29(3), 427–453.
De Costa, P., Park, J., & Wee, L. (2016). Language
learning as linguistic entrepreneurship: Implications for language
education. The Asia-Pacific Education
Researcher, 25, 695–702.
Duran, C. S., & Saenkhum, T. (2022). “Because
she’s not a native speaker of English, she doesn’t have the knowledge”: Positioning NNES scholars in U.S.
higher education, Race Ethnicity and Education.
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling
secrets, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate
others. Qualitative
Inquiry, 13(1), 3–29.
Fallas Escobar, C., & Pentón Herrera, L. J. (2022). Examining
raciolinguistic struggles in institutional settings: A
duoethnography. Linguistics and
Education 67, 101012.
Fox, J., & Gasper, R. (2020). The
choice to disclose (or not) mental health ill-health in UK higher education institutions: A duoethnography by
two female academics. Journal of Organizational
Ethnography, 9(3), 295–309.
Freyenhagen, F. (2018). Critical
Theory: Self-reflexive theorizing and struggles for emancipation. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Retrieved 18 May 2023 from [URL]
Gerald, J. P. B. (2022). Antisocial
language teaching: English and the pervasive pathology of
whiteness. Multilingual Matters.
Golombek, P., & Jordan, S. R. (2005). Becoming
“Black lambs” not “parrots”: A poststructuralist orientation to intelligibility and
identity. TESOL
Quarterly, 39(3), 513–533.
Hammine, M., & Rudolph, N. (2022). Perceiving
and problematizing ‘invisibility’ in English language education and criticality: A duoethnographic
dialogue. Asian
Englishes, 25(3), 311–325.
Held, D. (1980). Introduction
to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. University of California Press.
Holliday, A. (2005). The
struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford University Press.
(2014). Researching
English and culture and similar topics in ELT. The English Foreign Language
Journal, 5(1), 1–15.
Hooper, D., & Iijima, A. (2019). Examining
the “invisible wall” of native-speakerism in Japanese ELT: A duoethnography of teacher
experience. Asian Journal of English Language
Teaching, 28, 1–27.
Hooper, D., Oka, M., & Yamazawa, A. (2020). Not
all eikaiwas (or instructors) are created equal: A trioethnography of ‘native speaker’ and ‘non-native
speaker’ perspectives on English conversation schools in
Japan. In R. J. Lowe & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Duoethnography
in English language teaching: Research, reflection, and classroom
application (pp. 29–49). Multilingual Matters.
Horkheimer, M. (1993). The
present situation of social philosophy and the tasks of an institute for social
research. In M. Horkheimer, Between
philosophy and social science: Selected early
writings (pp.1–14). Continuum. (Original
work published 1931).
(1972a). Traditional
and critical theory. In M. Horkheimer, Critical
theory: Selected
essays. (pp.188–243). Continuum. (Original
work published 1937).
(1972b). Postscript. In M. Horkheimer, Critical
theory: Selected
essays. (pp.244–252). Continuum. (Original
work published 1937).
(1972). The
social function of philosophy. In M. Horkheimer, Critical
theory: Selected
essays. (pp.253–272). Continuum. (Original
work published 1939).
Jay, M. (1973). The
dialectical imagination: A history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute for Social
Research. University of California Press.
Jenkins, S. (2019). Examining
the (im)mobility of African American Muslim TESOL teachers in Saudi
Arabia. Transitions: Journal of Transient
Migration, 3(2), 157–175.
Jordan, G., & Long, M. (2022). English
language teaching now and how it could be. Cambridge Scholars.
Knisely, K., & Paiz, J. M. (2021). Bringing
trans, non-binary, and queer understandings to bear in language
education. Critical Multilingualism
Studies, 9(1), 23–45.
Kubota, R. (1999). Japanese
culture constructed by discourses: Implications for applied linguistic research and English language
teaching. TESOL
Quarterly, 33(1), 9–35.
Kubota, R., & Lin, A. (Eds.). (2009). Race,
culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged
practice. Routledge.
Lawrence, L., & Lowe, R. J. (2020). An
introduction to duoethnography. In R. J. Lowe & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Duoethnography
in English language teaching: Research, reflection, and classroom
application. (pp.1–26). Multilingual Matters.
Lawrence, L., & Nagashima, Y. (2020). The
intersectionality of gender, sexuality, race, and native-speakerness: Investigating ELT teacher identity
through duoethnography. Journal of Language, Identity &
Education, 19(1), 42–55.
Lowe, R. J. (2020). Uncovering
ideology in English language teaching: Identifying the ‘native speaker’
frame. Springer.
(2022). Native-speakerism
among Japanese teacher trainees: Ideology, framing, and counter-framing. JALT
Journal, 44(2), 235–259.
(2023). Frames,
ideologies, and the construction of professional identities among non-Japanese EFL teachers in
Japan. In M. Mielick, R. Kubota, & L. Lawrence (Eds.), Discourses
of identity: Language learning and teaching perspectives in
Japan. (pp.301–319) Palgrave millan
Lowe, R. J., & Kiczkowiak, M. (2016). Native-speakerism
and the complexity of personal experience: A duoethnographic study. Cogent
Education, 3(1), 1264171.
MacDonald, M. N., & O’Regan, J. P. (2013). The
ethics of intercultural communication, Educational Philosophy and
Theory, 45(10), 1005–1017.
Marx, K. (1992). Economic
and philosophical manuscripts. In K. Marx, Early
writings. (pp. 279–400). Penguin. (Original
work published 1844).
McCarthy, T. (1993). The
idea of a critical theory and its relation to
philosophy. In S. Benhabib, W. Bonß, & J. McCole (Eds.), On
Max Horkheimer: New
perspectives (pp.127–152). The MIT Press.
Menken, K., & Sánchez, M. T. (2019). Translanguaging
in English-only schools: From pedagogy to stance in the disruption of monolingual policies and
practices. TESOL
Quarterly, 53(3),741–767.
Moore, A. (2021). A
plea to stop debating and erasing queer lives in ELT. ELT
Journal, 75(3), 362–365.
Morgan, B. (2007). Poststructuralism
and applied linguistics: Complementary approaches to identity and culture in
ELT. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds), International
handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 2,
pp. 949–968). Springer.
Musto, M. (2021). Alienation
redux: Marxian perspectives. In M. Musto (Ed.), Karl
Marx’s writings on
alienation. (pp. 3–48). Palgrave Macmillan.
Nelson, C. (1999). Sexual
identities in ESL: Queer theory and classroom inquiry. TESOL
Quarterly, 33(3), 371–391.
Norris, J., & Sawyer, R. (2012). Toward
a dialogic methodology. In J. Norris, R. Sawyer, & D. E. Lund (Eds.). Duoethnography:
Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational
research (pp. 9–40). Left Coast Press.
Norton, B., & Morgan, B. (2023). Poststructuralism. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The
encyclopedia of applied linguistics.
O’Regan, J. P. (2014). English
as a lingua franca: An immanent critique. Applied
Linguistics, 35(5), 533–552.
Ollman, B. (1976). Alienation:
Marx’s conception of man in capitalist society (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Ramjattan, V. A. (2019). Racializing
the problem of and solution to foreign accent in business. Applied Linguistics
Review, 13(4) 527–544.
Rose, H., & Montakantiwong, A. (2018). A
tale of two teachers: A duoethnography of the realistic and idealistic successes and failures of teaching
English as an international language. RELC
Journal, 49(1), 88–101.
Sawyer, R. D., & Liggett, T. (2012). Shifting
positionalities: A critical discussion of a duoethnographic inquiry of a personal curriculum of
post/colonialism. International Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 11(5), 628–651.
Simpson, W. (2018). Neoliberal
fetishism: The language learner as homo œconomicus. Language and Intercultural
Communication, 18(5), 507–519.
Stanley, P. (2019). Autoethnography
and ethnography in English language
teaching. In A. Gao (Ed.), Second
handbook of English language
teaching (pp. 1071–1090). Springer.
