In:Reflexive and Reflective Research Approaches in Applied Linguistics
Edited by Pejman Habibie and Richard D. Sawyer
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 8] 2025
► pp. 61–79
Chapter 4Toward an understanding of currere as a research method
Published online: 3 March 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.04wan
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.8.04wan
Abstract
This chapter introduces and explicates currere as a research method as well as a
key concept in curriculum, which was first invoked by William
Pinar during the 1970s to understand how one’s educational experience can contribute to academic study
and vice versa. The method of currere emphasizes the lived experience of curriculum — to run the
course — but also includes the social, political, and cultural enactment of experience through conversation. Employing
psychoanalytical technique, currere allows one to turn inward. As argued by Pinar (2019), the understanding
of lived experience involves working from within as one encounters self, others, and world. The method of
currere renders self knowledge that is never still, self-identical, making oneself a subject in a
recursive process between self and the world, past and future. Pinar delineates four steps (regression, progression, analysis, and synthesis) to engage the individual
in both temporal and reflective movements, thus enabling one’s understanding of what operatives have been at work in
an individual’s educational experience. Eventually, through understanding oneself, the whole world unfolds in front of
us (Wang,
2020).
Article outline
- Introduction
- Central tenets of currere
- Currere as complicated conversation
- Currere as temporality — past, present, and future
- Currere as lived experience
- Currere as working from within
- Practice and pedagogy of currere
- Currere and curriculum studies
- Currere and other methods
- Difficulties and challenges — is currere solipsistic?
- Ethical issues in currere
- Conclusion
References
References (48)
Adams, T. E., Ellis, C., Jones, S. H. (2017). Autoethnography. In J. Matthes, C. S. Davis, & R. F. Potter, (Eds.), The
international encyclopedia of communication research
methods. Wiley-Blackwell.
Baszile, D. (2015). Critical
race/feminist currere. In M. He, M. Schultz, & W. Schubert (Eds.), The
Sage guide to curriculum in
education (pp. 119–126). Sage.
Carson, T. (2017). Crossing
the continental divide. In M. A. Doll (Ed.), The
reconceptualization of curriculum studies: A festschrift in honor of William F.
Pinar (1st
ed.). Routledge.
Clandinin, D. J., & Rosiek, J. (2007). Mapping
a landscape of narrative inquiry: Borderland spaces and
tensions. In D. J. Clandinin (Ed.), Handbook
of narrative inquiry: Mapping a
methodology (pp. 35–75). Sage.
Connelly, M., & Clandinin, J. (1990). Stories
of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational
Researcher 19(4), 2.14.
Daniel, D. K. (1991). Teaching
as hermeneutics (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Alberta, Canada.
Delmas, P. M., & Giles, R. L. (2023). Qualitative
research approaches and their application in
education. In R. J. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International
encyclopedia of education (4th
ed., pp. 24–32). Elsevier.
Doerr, M. (2004). Currere
and environmental autobiography: A phenomenological approach to the teaching of
ecology. Peter Lang.
Doll, M. (2017). The
mythopoetics of currere: Memories, dreams, and literary texts as teaching avenues to
self-study. Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research
methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed
methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Edgerton, S. (1991). Particularities
of otherness: Autobiography, Maya Angelou, and
me. In J. Kincheloe & W. F. Pinar (Eds.), Curriculum
as social psychoanalysis: The significance of
place (pp. 77–79). State University of New York Press.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2010). Autoethnography:
An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social
Research, 12(1), Art.
10. [URL]
Graham, R. (1991). Reading
and writing the self: Autobiography in education and the curriculum. Teachers College Press.
Grumet, M. (1976). Existential
and phenomenological foundations. In W. Pinar & M. Grumet (Eds.), Toward
a poor
curriculum (pp. 31–50). Kendall/Hunt.
Hyder, T. W. (1998). A
model for remedial writing instruction based on autobiographical theory and informed by critical pedagogy
(community colleges, composition, writing instruction) (Unpublished doctoral
dissertation). University of Virginia, Charlotte.
Kincheloe, J., & Pinar, W. (Eds.), (1991). Curriculum
as social psychoanalysis: The significance of place. State University of New York Press.
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking
research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical
perspectives in situated research. Modern Language
Journal, 92(4), 503–518.
Magrini, J. (2011). Huebner’s
critical encounter with the philosophy of Heidegger in Being and Time: Learning,
understanding, and the authentic unfolding of history in the
curriculum. KRITIKE, 5(2), 123–155.
Miller, J. L. (2010). Autobiographical
theory. In C. Kridel (Ed.), Encyclopedia
of curriculum
studies (pp. 61–65). Sage.
(2017). Generous
interrogations and affirmations: Histories and
trajectories. In M. A. Doll (Ed.), The
reconceptualization of curriculum studies: A festschrift in honor of William F.
Pinar (pp. 103–110). Routledge.
Morris, M. (2015). Currere
as subject matter. In M. F. He, B. D. Schultz, & W. H. Schubert (Eds.), The
Sage guide to curriculum in
education (pp. 103–109). Sage.
Murillo, F. (2019). William
Pinar responding to Elliot Eisner. Encounters in Theory and History of
Education, 20(1), 159–164.
Norris, J., Sawyer, R. D., & Lund, D. (Eds.). (2012). Duoethnography:
Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational
research. Routledge.
(2012b). Endorsement. In J. Norris, R. D. Sawyer, & D. Lund (Eds.), Duoethnography:
Dialogic methods for social, health, and educational research. West Coast Press.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding
curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum
discourse. Peter Lang.
Sawyer, R. & Norris, J. (2012). Duoethnography:
Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Schubert, W. H. (2009). Currere and
disciplinarity in curriculum studies: Possibilities for education
research. Educational
Researcher, 38(2), 136–140.
Shapiro, J. P., & Stefkovich, J. A. (2011). Ethical
leadership and decision making in education: Applying theoretical perspectives to complex dilemmas (3rd
ed.). Routledge.
Wang, W. (2017). Currere,
subjective reconstruction and autobiographical inquiry. Transnational
Curriculum
Inquiry, 14(2), 110–141.
(2020). Chinese
currere, subjective reconstruction and attunement: When calls my
heart. Palgrave Macmillan.
