In:Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 218–234
Chapter 12Ethical research considerations in classroom and online spaces with bilingual students and their
teachers
Published online: 21 November 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.14wri
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.14wri
Abstract
In this chapter I discuss the macro- and micro-ethical ethical dilemmas I have faced in four past
and current research projects with bilingual students in physical and online learning spaces. These include obtaining
IRB approval, securing informed consent, ensuring participant confidentiality, addressing unanticipated ethical issues
in the field, and making decisions about appropriate public uses of the data. I discuss how research in online
learning spaces can introduce new macro- and micro-ethical issues. To illustrate macro-ethical issues, I will provide
two examples from studies in heritage language programs to demonstrate challenges related to following IRB protocols.
Next, to illustrate micro-ethical issues, I discuss a series of ethical questions which arose during a study of
newcomer ELL students. Finally, I will discuss both macro- and micro-ethics issues myself and members of our larger
research team have addressed or continue to grapple with in a large-scale longitudinal study of ELL and dual language
bilingual education (DLBE) teachers. The chapter concludes by reaffirming the need for ethical reflexivity and
responsible decision making during all phases of the research process, and offers suggestions for doing so.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Conceptualizing ethics
- Ethics in practice
- Study of an after school Khmer heritage language program
- Study of in-school Khmer and Vietnamese heritage language programs
- Study of newcomer ELL students
- Studies on improving instruction in ELL and DLBE classrooms
- Teacher’s understandings of selves as grant vs. research participants
- Classroom observations
- Coaching conversations and coursework as data
- Distance from the participants
- Pandemic shifts and the introduction of new macro- and micro-ethical issues
- Commentary and reflections
Acknowledgements References
References (31)
AAAL Ethics Guidelines Task
Force. (2017). AAAL ethics
guidelines. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
British Association for Applied
Linguistics. (2021). Recommendations on good practice in
applied linguistics. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
Carnegie Council for Ethics in International
Affairs. (2022). Cultural
relativism. Retrieved on 26 June 2024 from [URL]
Chik, C., & Wright, W. E. (2017). Overcoming
the obstacles: Vietnamese and Khmer heritage language programs in
California. In O. Kagan, M. Carreira, & C. Chik (Eds.), A
handbook on heritage language education: From innovation to program
building (pp. 222–236). Routledge.
Choi, W., Kim, W. H., Wright, W. E., & Morita-Mullaney, T. (2022). Improving
English language arts instruction in Indiana dual language bilingual education
classrooms. Language and
Education, 37(2), 151–170.
De Costa, P. I. (2015). Ethics
and applied linguistics research. In P. Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research
methods in applied linguistics: A practical
resource (pp. 245–257). Bloomsbury.
(2016a). Ethics
in applied linguistics research: An
introduction. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics
in applied linguistics: Researcher
narratives (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
De Costa, P. I., Lee, J., Rawal, H., & Li, W. (2020). Ethics
in applied linguistics research. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of research methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 122–130). Routledge.
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics,
reflexivity, and ethically important moments in research. Qualitative
Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280.
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking
research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical
perspectives in situated research. Modern Language
Journal, 92(4), 503–518.
Lee, J. S., & Wright, W. E. (2014). The
rediscovery of heritage and community language education in the United
States. Review of Research in
Education, 38, 137–165.
Morita-Mullaney, T., Renn, J., Garcia, A., & Wright, W. E. (2020). Preparing
K–12 teachers for effective instruction of English learners: The transformation of a Purdue University online
language teacher education program. In H. S. Kang, D. S. Shin, & T. Cimasko (Eds.), Online
education for teachers of English as a global
language (pp. 19–38). Routledge.
National Institutes of
Health. (2020). Responsible conduct of research
training. Retrieved on 26 June 2026 from [URL]
Ortega, L. (2005). Methodology,
epistemology, and ethics in instructed SLA research: An introduction. Modern
Language
Journal, 89(3), 317–327.
Paulus, T. M., & Wise, A. F. (2019). Looking
for insight, transformation, and learning in online
talk. Routledge.
Spilioti, T., & Tagg, C. (2016). The
ethics of online research methods in applied linguistics: Challenges, opportunities, and directions in ethical
decision-making. Applied Linguistics
Review, 8(2–3), 163–167.
Sterling, S., & Gass, S. (2017). Exploring
the boundaries of research ethics: Perceptions of ethics and ethical behaviors in applied linguistics
research. System, 70, 50–62.
Tao, J., Shao, Q., & Gao, X. (2016). Ethics-related
practices in Internet-based applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics
Review, 8(4), 321–353.
Vrikkia, M., Warwicka, P., Vermunta, J. D., Mercera, N., & Van Halemb, N. (2017). Teacher
learning in the context of lesson study: A video-based analysis of teacher
discussions. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 61, 211–224.
Wright, W. E. (2006). Meeting
the needs of newcomer non-Spanish-speaking ELLs: A case study of two Cambodian students in a suburban
intermediate school. In M. Cowart & P. Dam (Eds.), Cultural
and linguistic issues for English language
learners (pp. 108–141). CANH NAM Publishers & Texas Woman’s University.
(2007a). Heritage
language programs in the era of English-only and No Child Left Behind. Heritage
Language
Journal, 5(1), 1–26.
(2007b). The
situation of the Khmer language in the United
States. In J. T. Tsuchida, J. M. Benitez, & D. S. Toji (Eds.), Education,
youth, leadership, labor: Asian Pacific American and Latino
perspectives (pp. 113–150). Center for Asian Pacific American Studies, California State University, Long Beach.
(2010a). Khmer
as a heritage language in the United States: Historical sketch, current realities, and future
prospects. Heritage Language
Journal, 7(1), 117–147.
(2010b). Khmer
language use in Cambodian American
communities. In J. H. X. Lee (Ed.), Cambodian
American experiences: Histories, communities, cultures, and
identity (pp. 162–179). Kendall/Hunt Publishing.
Wright, W. E., & Choi, W. (2024). DLBE
program types for different target
populations. In J. A. Freire, C. Alfaro, & E. de Jong (Eds.), The
handbook of dual language bilingual
education (pp. 94–114). Wiley.
Wright, W. E., & Li, X. (2006). Catching
up in math? The case of newly-arrived Cambodian students in a Texas intermediate
school. TABE
Journal, 9(1), 1–22.
