Cover not available

In:Ethical Issues in Applied Linguistics Scholarship
Edited by Peter I. De Costa, Amr Rabie-Ahmed and Carlo Cinaglia
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 7] 2024
► pp. 87–109

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Transcription as ethics

(Re)Presenting young children’s complex communicative repertoires in Applied Linguistics research

 | Arizona State University
 | University of Georgia
 | Stanford University
Published online: 21 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.7.06ber
Abstract
What are a researcher’s ethical obligations when creating transcripts that represent young children’s complex communicative repertoires? How do those obligations shape transcription choices, such as which codes and modes are represented and how? In this chapter, we draw on our collective years of ethnographic research with young children in diverse language settings to argue for viewing transcription choices as ethical considerations. We share three vignettes from our own research with young children with complex communicative repertoires, including multilingualism, signed languages, and augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices. In each case, we share our transcription dilemmas, the decisions we ultimately made, and the ideas that informed those decisions. We end with guiding questions to help researchers make transcription decisions that are not just technically and theoretically sound, but also ethically sound.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • What do we mean by research ethics?
  • Transcription
    • Transcription as technique
    • Transcription as theory
    • Transcription as ethics
  • Transcription as ethics (of care)-in-practice: Three vignettes
    • Vignette 1: Why transcribe multilingual, multimodal repertoires in a study of English learning? (Katie A. Bernstein)
      • Recording decisions
      • Perceiving decisions
      • Representing decisions
    • Vignette 2: Transcribing co-participation and embodied layers
      of sign-speech in classroom interactions between deaf and hearing children (Jennifer Johnson)
      • Recording decisions
      • Perceiving decisions
      • Representing decisions
    • Vignette 3: Transcribing multimodal speech in a significant disability/rare disease context (Usree Bhattacharya)
  • Discussion: What do these three cases reflect?
  • (Some) reflection questions to guide ethical transcription
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (34)
References
Bhattacharya, K. (2007). Consenting to the consent form: What are the fixed and fluid understandings between the researcher and the researched? Qualitative Inquiry, 13(8), 1095–1115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Othering research, researching the other: De/colonizing approaches to qualitative inquiry. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 105–150). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, U. (2011). The “West” in literacy. Berkeley Review of Education, 2(2), 179–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, U. & Pradana, W. (2022). Exploring literacy engagement in a significant disability context. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernstein, K. A. (2019). Ethics in practice and answerability in complex, multi-participant studies. In D. S. Warriner & M. Bigelow (Eds.), Critical reflections on research methods: Power and equity in complex multilingual contexts (pp. 127–142). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). (Re)defining success in language learning: Positioning, participation and young emergent bilinguals at school. Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blee, K. M., & Currier, A. (2011). Ethics beyond the IRB: An introductory essay. Qualitative Sociology, 34(3), 401–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439–1465. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2007). Variation in transcription. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 784–808. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2023). A decolonial crip linguistics. Applied linguistics, 44(1), 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Costa, P. I. (2016). Ethics in applied linguistics research: An introduction. In P. I. De Costa (Ed.), Ethics in applied linguistics: Researcher narratives (pp. 1–11). Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: Some research procedures and their rationales. In J. Green, G. Camilli, & P. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp.177–191). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, J., Franquiz, M., & Dixon, C. (1997). The myth of the objective transcript: Transcribing as a situated act. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 172–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, J. L., & Stewart, A. (2012). Linguistic perspectives in qualitative research in education: A brief history. In S. Delamont (Ed.), Handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 61–81). Edgar Elgar Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guillemin, M., & Gillam, L. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 261–280. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henner, J., & Robinson, O. (2021, July 8). Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: Imaging a crip linguistics. Retrieved on 25 April 2024 from. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). Unsettling languages, unruly bodyminds: A crip linguistics manifesto. Journal of Critical Study of Communication & Disability, 1(1), 7–37.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jenks, C. J. (2013). Working with transcripts: An abridged review of issues in transcription. Language and Linguistics Compass, 7(4), 251–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, J. T. (2017). Performing deafness: Symbolic power as embodied by deaf and hearing preschoolers. L2 Journal, 9(2). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knapton, O. (2013). Publishing in multimodal formats: Opportunities and challenges. TESOL Quarterly, 47(4), 856–866. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kouritzin, S., & Nakagawa, S. (2018). Toward a non-extractive research ethics for transcultural, translingual research: Perspectives from the coloniser and the colonised. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(8), 675–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. The Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R. & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, E. (2011). Ethical issues in addressing inequity in/through ESL research. TESL Canada Journal 28(5), 31–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2007). Commentary: Transcript variations and the indexicality of transcribing practices. Discourse Studies, 9(6), 809–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs & B. B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, D. (1982). ‘Ritin folklower daun ‘rong. Journal of American Folklore, 95, 304–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1985). The Li’l Abner syndrome: Written representations of speech. American Speech, 60, 328–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (1997). Transcribing talk: Issues of representation. TESOL Quarterly, 31(1), 167–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rymes, B. (2014). Communicating beyond language: Everyday encounters with diversity. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoen Simmons, E. (2021). Vocalization. In F. R. Volkmar (Ed.), Encyclopedia of autism spectrum disorders (pp. 5150–5151). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seibert, A. D. (2022). Transparency with second language and multilingual transcription. TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 499–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sis Invalid. (n.d.). Sis Ivalid.org. Retrieved 25 April 2024 from [URL]
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Gao, Xuesong (Andy) & Runhan Zhang
2025. Ethical research practices with young language learners. In Child-centered Approaches to Applied Linguistic Research [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 13], ► pp. 96 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue