In:Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 246–263
Chapter 15Repertory grids
How grades might be interpreted
Published online: 5 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.15gro
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.15gro
Abstract
Recent literature suggests that
classroom-based assessment should perhaps work from a different
set of assumptions than large-scale testing. This idea is
explored through RGT by asking how seven teachers, each with a
unique approach to teaching and assessment, create their grades
in a multi-faculty undergraduate EFL course in Japan. In an
interview, the researcher asked each teacher to compare a sample
of their own students achieving different grades, demonstrating
the teachers’ constructs for teaching and assessment. These were
then analyzed, and subject to a form of content analysis used in
RGT. The process revealed that, although the assessment approach
used by each teacher differed, the grade reflected similar
underlying teaching values that seemed to be legitimate
expressions of the framework provided by the institution.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.An overview of the study
- 3.Why was repertory grid technique used? How was it implemented?
- 4.What challenges were faced? How were the challenges addressed?
- 5.Insights gained using repertory grid technique
- 6.Conclusions
References
References (25)
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic
analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA
handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2:
Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative,
neuropsychological, and
biological. (pp. 57–71). American Psychological Association.
Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded
theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in
research
practice. Oxford University Press.
Burr, V., King, N., & Butt, T. (2014). Personal
construct psychology methods for qualitative
research. International
Journal of Social Research
Methodology, 17(4), 341–355.
Butler, C. (2018). The
ronin teacher: Making a living as a full-time
part-timer at Japanese
universities. In C. C. Hale & P. Wadden (Eds.), Teaching
English at Japanese
universities (Kindle).
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing
grounded theory: A practical guide through
qualitative analysis (2nd
ed.). Sage.
Denicolo, P., Long, T., & Bradley-Cole, K. (2016). Constructivist
approaches and research methods: A practical guide
to exploring personal
meanings. Sage.
Fransella, F. (2005). Some
skills and tools for personal construct
users. In F. Fransella (Ed.), The
essential practitioner’s handbook of personal
construct
psychology (pp. 41–56). John Wiley & Sons.
Fulcher, G., & Davidson, F. (2007). Language
testing and assessment: An advanced resource
book. Routledge.
Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical
sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded
theory. Sociology Press.
Grogan, M. (2021). Making
the grade: An investigation into the creation and
meaning of grades in university EFL classrooms in
Japan (Unpublished
doctoral
dissertation). Kansai University Graduate School of Foreign Language Education and Research.
Hanks, J. (2017). Exploratory
practice in language teaching: Puzzling about
principles and
practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
Herdenstam, A. P. F., Nilsen, A. N., Öström, Å., & Harrington, R. J. (2018). Sommelier
training – Dialogue seminars and repertory grid
method in combination as a pedagogical
tool. International
Journal of Gastronomy and Food
Science, 13, 78–89.
Honey, P. (1979). The
repertory grid in action: How to use it to conduct
an attitude
survey. Industrial
and Commercial
Training, 11, 452–459.
Kelly, G. (1991). The
psychology of personal constructs, Volume One:
Theory and
personality. Routledge.
MEXT. (2018). Heisei 29-nendo eigodjikara chōsa
kekka (kōkō 3-nensei) no gaiyōHeisei 29-nendo
eigodjikara chōsa kekka (kōkō 3-nensei) no
gaiyō [Outline of Heisei 29 English proficiency research
result (third grade of high
school)]. Retrieved
on 24
July from [URL]
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative
data analysis: A methods
sourcebook. (3rd
ed.). Sage.
Moss, P. A., Pullin, D. C., Gee, J. P., Haertel, E. H., & Young, L. J. (2008). Assessment,
equity, and opportunity to
learn. Cambridge University Press.
Rad, A., Wahlberg, O., & Öhman, P. (2013). How
lending officers construe assessments of small and
medium-sized enterprise loan applications: A
repertory grid
study. Journal of
Constructivist
Psychology, 26(4), 262–279.
Shepard, L. A. (2020). Should
“measurement” have a role in teacher learning about
classroom
assessment? In S. Brookhart & J. A. McMillan (Eds.), Classroom
assessment and educational
measurement (pp. 192–205). Routledge.
Turner, C. E. (2012). Classroom
assessment. In G. Fulcher & L. Harding (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of language
testing (pp. 64–78). Routledge.
WebGrid
Plus. (2020). Retrieved
on 24 July
2023 from [URL]
