In:Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 162–179
Chapter 10Phenomenology
Published online: 5 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.10ost
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.10ost
Abstract
This chapter aims to explore Phenomenology as
a research methodology. To this end, it will first present its
epistemological, ontological, and axiological underpinnings. It
will then briefly explain its theoretical foundations by
explaining the similarities and differences between
transcendental and interpretative Phenomenology. This is
followed by the principles and properties that differentiate
Phenomenology from other modes of qualitative research.
Subsequently, the purpose of this mode of research is clarified
by explaining and exemplifying the types of research questions
it tackles. More practical aspects of this methodology will then be
explored by illustrating how the data are collected and analysed
and how ethical issues are addressed in the research process and
product. Finally, it will present responses to the critiques
levelled against this research methodology before concluding the
chapter.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical foundations
- 3.Methodological orientation
- 3.1Principles and affordances
- 3.2Types of research questions addressed
- 3.3Data collection and analysis procedure
- 3.4Ethical considerations
- 4.Critiques and responses
- 5.Conclusions
References
References (64)
Allison, P., & Pomeroy, E. (2000). How
shall we know? Epistemological concerns in research
in experiential
education. Journal of
Experiential
Education, 23(2), 91–98.
Barclay, M. W. (1992). The
utility of hermeneutic interpretation in
psychotherapy. Theoretical
and Philosophical
Psychology, 12(2), 103–118.
Beck, C. (1993). Qualitative
research: The evaluation of its credibility,
fittingness, and
auditability. Western
Journal of Nursing
Research, 15(2), 263–266.
Breaden, K. (1997). Cancer
and beyond: The question of
survivorship. Journal
of Advanced
Nursing, 26, 978–84.
Breen, L., & Darlaston-Jones, D. (2008). Moving
beyond the enduring dominance of positivism in
psychological research: An Australian
perspective. Paper
presented at the 43rd
Australian Psychological Society Annual
Conference.
Capron, A. M. (1989). Human
experimentation. In R. M. Veatch (Ed.), Medical
ethics (pp. 125–172). Jones & Bartlett.
Cilesiz, S. (2010). A
phenomenological approach to experiences with
technology: Current state, promise, and future
directions for
research. Educational
Technology Research and
Development, 59, 487–510. [URL]
Dahlberg, K., Dahlberg, H., & Nyström, M. (2008). Reflective
lifeworld research (2nd
ed.). Studentlitteratur.
Dowling, M., & Cooney, A. (2012). Research
approaches related to phenomenology: Negotiating a
complex
landscape. Nurse
Researcher, 20(2), 21–27.
(1998). The hermeneutic circle: The elevation of the historicity of understanding to the status of a hermeneutic principle. In L. Alcoff (ed.), Epistemology: The Big Questions (pp. 232–249). Blackwell.
Giorgi, A., & Giorgi, B. (2003). The
descriptive phenomenological psychological
method. In P. Camic, J. Rhodes, & L. Yardley (Eds). Qualitative
research in psychology: Expanding perspectives in
methodology and
design (pp. 243–273). American Philosophical Association.
Greene, M. (1997). The
lived world, literature and
education. In D. Vandenberg (ed.), Phenomenology
and education
discourse (pp. 169–190). Heinemann.
Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code
saturation versus meaning saturation: How many
interviews are
enough? Qualitative
Health
Research, 27(4), 591–608.
(1989). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy-Second Book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Husserl, E. (1970). The
crisis of European sciences and transcendental
phenomenology (D. Carr, Trans). Northwestern University Press.
(2003). Ideas:
General introduction to pure
phenomenology. Translated
by W. R. Boyce Gibson. Routledge.
Hycner, R. H. (1985). Some
guidelines for the phenomenological analysis of
interview data. Human
Studies, 8, 279–303.
Kang, E., & Kwang, H. (2021). Ethical
conducts in qualitative research methodology:
Participant observation and interview
process. Journal of
Research and Publication
Ethics, 2(2021), 5–10.
Koch, T. (1995). Interpretive
approaches in nursing research: The influence of
Husserl and
Heidegger. Journal of
Advanced
Nursing, 21(5), 827–836.
(1996). Implementation
of a hermeneutic inquiry in nursing: Philosophy,
rigor and
representation. Journal
of Advanced
Nursing, 24, 174–184.
Kondowe, C., & Booyens, M. (2014). A
student’s experience of gaining access for
qualitative
research. Social
Work, 50(1), 146–152.
Kvale, S. (1989). To validate is to question. In S. Kvale (Ed.), Issues of validity in qualitative research (pp. 73–92). Student litteratur.
Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic
phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of
historical and methodical
considerations. International
Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 2(3), Article
3.
Lopez, K. A., & Willis, D. G. (2004). Descriptive
versus interpretive phenomenology: Their
contributions to nursing
knowledge. Qualitative
Health
Research, 14(5), 726–735.
McIntyre, R., & Smith, D. W. (1989). Theory of intentionality. In William R. McKenna & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Husserl’s Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America.
Moerer-Urdahl, T., & Creswell, J. (2004). Using
transcendental phenomenology to explore the “ripple
effect’’ in a leadership mentoring
program. International
Journal of Qualitative
Methods, 3(2), 1–28.
Munhall, P. L. (1989). Philosophical
pondering on qualitative research methods in
nursing. Nursing
Science
Quarterly, 2(1), 20–28.
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social
research methods: Qualitative and quantitative
approaches (D. Musslewhite (Ed.), 7th
ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
Norlyk, A., & Harder, I. (2010). What
makes a phenomenological study phenomenological? An
analysis of peer-reviewed empirical
nursing. Qualitative
Health
Research, 20(3), 420–431.
O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards
for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of
recommendations. Academic
Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251.
Osborne, J. (1994). Some
similarities and differences among phenomenological
and other methods of psychological qualitative
research. Canadian
Psychology, 35(2), 167–189.
Pieper, I., & Thomson, C. J. (2016). Beneficence
as a principle in human
research. Monash
Bioethics
Review, 34(2), 117–135.
Punch, K. F. (1998). Introduction
to social research: Quantitative and qualitative
approaches (1st
ed.). Sage.
Rodgers, B. L. (2005). Interpretive
inquiry: The mirror
cracked. In B. L. Rodgers (Ed.), Developing
nursing knowledge: Philosophical traditions and
influences (pp. 145–159). Williams & Wilkins.
Roy, J.-M. (2007). Heterophenomenology
and phenomenological
skepticism. Phenomenology
and the Cognitive
Sciences, 6, 1–20.
Speziale, H. J. S., & Carpenter, D. R. (2007). Qualitative
research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic
imperative (4th
ed.). Williams & Wilkins.
Stewart, D., & Mickunas, A. (1974). Exploring
phenomenology. A guide to the field and its
literature. American Library Association.
Streubert, H., & Carpenter, D. (1995). Qualitative
research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic
imperative. Lippincott.
Villanueva, J. (2014). La
fenomenología como afirmación de un nuevo
humanismo. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos.
Wall, C., Glenn, S., Mitchinson, S., & Poole, H. (2004). Using
a reflective diary to develop bracketing skills
during a phenomenological
investigation. Nurse
Researcher, 11(4), 20–29.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2000). Introducing
communication theory: Analysis and application.
Mountain
View. Mayfield.
