In:Less Frequently Used Research Methodologies in Applied Linguistics
Edited by A. Mehdi Riazi
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 6] 2024
► pp. 127–148
Chapter 8Grounded Theory
Published online: 5 January 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.08had
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.6.08had
Abstract
This chapter explores the underutilized
Grounded Theory Methodology (GTM) in applied linguistics,
detailing its procedures, objectives, benefits, and limitations
from a post-positivist perspective. It suggests ways for
educators and scholars to apply GTM to generate insightful
social interaction theories within classrooms and discusses the
role of technology in data collection. The text addresses
critiques and ethical questions associated with GTM. When implemented rigorously, GTM can enhance not
only teaching practices within applied linguistics but also
offer fresh insights to scholarly communities beyond this
field.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical foundations
- 2.1American pragmatism
- 2.2Symbolic interactionism
- 2.3Empirical sociology
- 2.4Emergence of the grounded theory methodology
- 3.Methodological orientation
- 3.1Principles and affordances
- 3.2Types of research questions addressed by the GTM
- 3.3Procedures of data collection and analysis
- 3.4Ethical issues
- 4.Critiques and responses
- 5.Conclusions
References
References (73)
Akcan, S., Aydin, B., Karaman, C., Seferoğlu, G., Korkmazgil, S., Özbilgin, A., & Selvi, A. (2017). Qualities
and qualifications of EFL professionals: What do
intensive english program administrators
think? TESOL
Journal, 8(3), 675–699.
Allan, G. (2003). A
critique of using grounded theory as a research
method. Electronic
Journal of Business Research
Methods, 2(1), 1–10. Retrieved 18 March
2021 from [URL]
Annells, M. (1996). Grounded
theory method: Philosophical perspectives, paradigm
of inquiry, and
postmodernism. Qualitative
Health
Research, 6(3), 379–393.
(1997). Grounded
theory method, part 1: Within the five moments of
qualitative
research. Nursing
Inquiry, 4(2), 120–129.
Backman, K., & Kyngas, H. (1999). Challenges
of the grounded theory approach to a novice
researcher. Nursing
and Health
Sciences, 1, 147–153.
Bell, J. (2005). Doing
your research project: A guide for first-time
researchers in education, health and social
science (4th
ed.). Open University Press & McGraw-Hill Education.
Benson, P. (2018). Narrative
analysis. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The
palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research
methodology (pp. 595–613). Palgrave Macmillan.
Blumer, H. (1969/1998). Symbolic
interactionism: Perspective and
method. University of California Press.
Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded
theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in
research
practice. Oxford University Press.
Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded
theory research: Methods and
practices. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The
SAGE handbook of grounded
theory (pp. 1–28). Sage.
Burawoy, M. (1991). The
extended case
method. In M. Burawoy, A. Burton, A. Ferguson, K. Fox, J. Gamson, N. Gartrell, L. Hurst, C. Kurzman, L. Salzinger, J. Schiffman, & S. Ui (Eds.), Ethnography
unbound: Power and resistance in the modern
metropolis (pp. 271–287). The University of California Press.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative
action research for english language
teachers. Cambridge University Press.
Canagarajah, A. (1999). Resisting
linguistic imperialism in english
teaching. Oxford University Press.
Charmaz, K. (1983). The
grounded theory method: An explication and
interpretation. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary
field
research (pp. 109–126). Little, Brown, and Company.
(2009). Shifting
the grounds: Constructivist grounded theory
methods. In J. Morse, P. Stern, J. Corbin, B. Bowers, K. Charmaz, & A. Clarke (Eds.), Developing
grounded theory: The second
generation (pp. 127–154). Left Coast Press.
(2014). Constructing
grounded theory: A practical guide through
qualitative analysis (2nd
ed.). Sage.
Cheek, J. (2005). The
practice and politics of funded qualitative
research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The
SAGE handbook of qualitative
research (3rd
ed., pp. 381–409). Sage.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics
of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded
theory (3rd
ed.). Sage.
(2015). Basics
of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures
for developing grounded
theory (4th
ed.). Sage.
Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative
inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five
traditions. Sage.
Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). Introduction:
Entering the field of qualitative
research. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The
landscape of qualitative research: Theories and
issues (pp. 1–34). Sage.
Geertz, C. (1973). Thick
description: Toward an interpretive history of
culture. In C. Geertz (Ed.), The
interpretation of
cultures (pp. 3–30). Basic Books.
Gerhardt, U. (2000). Ambivalent
interactionist: Anselm Strauss and the “schools” of
Chicago
sociology. The
American
Sociologist, 31(4), 34–64.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical
sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded
theory. Sociology Press.
(2002). Constructivist
grounded
theory? Forum
Qualitative Social
Research, 3(3). Retrieved 22 October
2006 from [URL]
Glaser, B., & Holton, J. (2004). Remodeling
grounded
theory. Forum
Qualitative Social
Research, 5(2). Retrieved 9 October
2006 from [URL]
(1967/1999). The
discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for
qualitative
research. Aldine de Gruyter.
Griffiths, C., Oxford, R., Kawai, Y., Kawai, C., Park, Y. Y., Ma, X., Meng, Y., & Yang, N.-D. (2014). Focus
on context: Narratives from east
asia. System, 43, 50–63.
Hadley, G. (2015). English
for academic purposes in neoliberal universities: A
critical grounded
theory. Springer.
(2017a). The
games people play: A critical study of ‘resource
leeching’ among ‘blended’ english for academic
purpose professionals in neoliberal
universities. In M. Flubacher & A. Del Percio (Eds.), Language,
education, and neoliberalism: Critical studies in
sociolinguistics (pp. 184–203). Multilingual Matters.
(2019a). Critical
grounded
theory. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The
SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded
theory (pp. 564–592). Sage.
(2019b). Grounded
theory
method. In J. McKinley & H. Rose (Eds.), The
Routledge handbook of research methods in applied
linguistics (pp. 264–275). Routledge.
Hallberg, L. (2010). Some
thoughts about the literature review in grounded
theory
studies. International
Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and
Well-Being, 5(3).
Hammersley, M., & Traianou, A. (2012). Ethics
in qualitative research: Controversies and
contexts. Sage.
Harklau, L. (2005). Ethnography
and ethnographic research on second language
teaching and
learning In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook
of research in second language teaching and
learning (pp. 179–194). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Harry, B., Sturges, K., & Klingner, J. (2005). Mapping
the process: An exemplar of process and challenge in
grounded theory
analysis. Educational
Researcher, 34(2), 3–13.
Holton, J. (2011). The
autonomous creativity of Barney Glaser: Early
influences in the emergence of classic grounded
theory
methodology. In V. G. Martin, A. (Ed.), Grounded
theory: The philosophy, method and work of barney
glaser (pp. 201–223). BrownWalker Press.
QSR
International Pty
Ltd. (2018). NVIVO
qualitative data analysis software
12.0. QSR International.
Kalan, A. (2016). Teaching
anglo-american academic writing and intercultural
rhetoric: A grounded theory study of practice in
ontario secondary
schools. Current
Studies in Comparative Education, Science and
Technology, 3, 57–75.
Layder, D. (1982). Grounded
theory: A constructive
critique. Journal for
the Theory of Social
Behaviour, 12(1), 103–122.
Lazarsfeld, P. (1962). The
sociology of empirical social
research. American
Sociological
Review, 27(6), 757–767.
Legewie, H., & Sherivier-Legewie, B. (2004). “Research
is hard work, it’s always a bit suffering. Therefore
on the other side it should be fun.” Anselm Strauss
in conversation with Heiner Legewie and Barbara
Schervier-Legewie. Forum
Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative
Social
Research, 53(22). Retrieved 17 January
2021 from [URL]
Lincoln, Y. (2005). Institutional
review boards and methodological conservatism: The
challenge to and from phenomenological
paradigms. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The
SAGE handbook of qualitative
research (3rd
ed., pp. 165–181). Sage.
McCallin, A. (2003). Grappling
with the literature in a grounded theory
study. Contemporary
Nurse, 15(1–2), 61–69.
Miller, S., & Fredericks, M. (1999). How
does grounded theory
explain? Qualitative
Health
Research, 9(4), 538–551.
Nagle, J. (2011). Saxe’s
aphorism (book review of legislation and regulation
by John F. Manning and Matthew C. Stephenson.
Foundation press
2010). George
Washington Law
Review, 79, 1505.
Rose, H., McKinley, J., & Briggs Baffoe-Djan, J. (2019). Data
collection research methods in applied
linguistics. Bloombury.
Ruhe, J., & Nahser, F. B. (2001). Putting
American pragmatism to work in the
classroom. Journal of
Business
Ethics, 34(3), 317–330.
Schenk, A., Hunziker, M., & Kienast, F. (2007). Factors
influencing the acceptance of nature conservation
measures--a qualitative study in
Switzerland. Journal
of Environmental
Management, 83(1), 66–79.
Scientific
Software Development,
GmbH. (2020). Atlas.Ti
9.0. (Version
9.0) Scientific Software Development.
Sikolia, D., Biros, D., Mason, M., & Weiser, M. (2013). Trustworthiness
of grounded theory methodology research in
information systems The
8th Annual MWAIS
Conference, Normal, IL
(USA). Retrieved
on 24 July
2023 from [URL]
Silva, T. (2005). On
the philosophical bases of inquiry in second
language writing: Metaphysics, inquiry paradigms,
and the intellectual
zeitgeist. In P. Matsuda (Ed.), Second
language writing research: Perspectives on the
process of knowledge
construction (pp. 3–16). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
(1994). Grounded
theory methodology: An
overview. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook
of qualitative
research (pp. 273–285). Sage.
Tarp, G. (2006). Student
perspectives in short-term study programmes abroad:
A grounded theory
study. Multilingual Matters.
VERBI
Software. (2019). MAXQDA
2020. VERBI Software. Retrieved
on 24 July
2023 from [URL]
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
