In:Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 364–381
Afterword
Published online: 23 October 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.17pol
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.17pol
In this afterword, I summarize the strengths and
challenges of different research methods used to study second language
writing processes with reference to the various chapters in the volume. This
is followed by a discussion of considerations researchers have to make when
choosing a method. Next, I summarize themes that are apparent throughout the
volume, and then focus on certain themes that I believe need more
attention.
Article outline
- Introduction
- Factors affecting choice of method (and vice versa)
- Writing conditions and prompts
- Participant characteristics
- Focus of the research
- One-shot or longitudinal research
- Summary of major themes addressed in the book
- Ecological validity, external validity, and authenticity
- Reductionism, triangulation, and the relationship between the parts and the whole
- Population variability and expansion to non-WEIRD populations
- Data reduction/presentation/coding
- Themes needing more attention
- Theoretical bases for studying the writing process
- The learning potential of research methods
- How understanding the writing process has or has not improved teaching
- Conclusion
References
References (28)
Aljaafreh, A., & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative
feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of
proximal development. The Modern
Language
Journal, 78(4), 465–483.
Andringa, S., & Godfroid, A. (2020). Sampling
bias and the problem of generalizability in applied
linguistics. Annual Review of Applied
Linguistics, 40, 134–142.
Brooks, L., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging
in a collaborative
setting. In A. Mackey & C. Polio (Eds.), Multiple
perspectives on interaction: Second language research in honor of
Susan M.
Gass. (pp. 58–89). Routledge.
Chan, C. S. (2019). Long-term
workplace communication needs of business professionals: Stories
from Hong Kong senior executives and their implications for ESP and
higher education. English for
Specific
Purposes, 56, 68–83.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A
cognitive process theory of
writing. College Composition and
Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Gonzalves, L. (2021). Development
of copying skills in L2 adult English learners with emergent print
literacy. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 51.
Hartshorn, K. J., Evans, N. W., Merrill, P. F., Sudweeks, R. R., Strong-Krause, D., & Anderson, N. J. (2010). Effects
of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing
accuracy. TESOL
Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109.
Hasrol, S. B., Zakaria, A., & Aryadoust, V. (2022). A
systematic review of authenticity in second language
assessment. Research Methods in
Applied
Linguistics, 1(3). 1000023.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A
new framework for understanding cognition and affect in
writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The
science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and
applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hort, S. (2017). Exploring
the use of mobile technologies and process logs in writing
research. International Journal of
Qualitative
Methods, 16(1).
Kessler, M. (2021). The
longitudinal development of second language writers’ metacognitive
genre awareness. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 53.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Research
methodology on language development from a complex systems
perspective. The Modern Language
Journal, 92(2), 200–213.
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schriver, K., & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing
in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital
sources. Journal of Writing
Research, 5(3), 285–337.
Lillis, T., & Curry, M. J. (2010). Academic
writing in a global context: The politics and practices of
publishing in
English. Routledge.
Lim, J., Tigchelaar, M., & Polio, C. (2022). Understanding
text-based studies of linguistic development through goals for
academic writing. Language
Awareness, 31(1), 117–136.
López-Serrano, S., de Larios, J. R., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language
reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a
theoretically motivated and empirically based coding
system. Studies in Second Language
Acquisition, 41(3), 503–527.
Manchón, R. M. (2021). The
contribution of ethnographically-oriented approaches to the study of
L2 writing and text production
processes. In I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies
of academic writing research: Theory, methods, and
interpretation (pp. 83–104). John Benjamins.
Pettitt, N., Gonzalves, L., Tarone, E., & Wall, T. (2021). Adult
L2 writers with emergent literacy: Writing development and
pedagogical considerations. Journal
of Second Language
Writing, 51.
Polio, C. (2012). The
relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error
correction debate. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 21(4), 375–389.
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding,
evaluating, and conducting second language writing
research. Routledge.
Polio, C. & Kessler, M. (2019). Teaching
L2 writing: Connecting SLA theory, research, and
pedagogy. In N. Polat, T. Gregersen, & P. MacIntyre (Eds.), Driven
pedagogy: Implications of L2 theory and research for the teaching of
language
skills (pp. 76–96). Routledge.
Susser, B. (1994). Process
approaches in ESL/EFL writing
instruction. Journal of Second
Language
Writing, 3(1), 31–47.
Swain, M. (2006a). Verbal
protocols: What does it mean for research to use speaking as a data
collection
tool? In M. Chaloub-Deville, M. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference
and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple research
perspectives (pp. 97–113). John Benjamins.
(2006b). Languaging,
agency, and collaboration in advanced second language
proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced
language learning: The contribution of Halliday and
Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.
Tan, X. (2023). Stories
behind the scenes: L2 students’ cognitive processes of multimodal
composing and traditional
writing. Journal of Second Language
Writing, 59.
