Cover not available

In:Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 123–140

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
Verbally mediated data

Written verbalizations

 | Miyagi University of Education
 | Josai Universty
 | University of Melbourne
Published online: 23 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.06suz
This chapter focuses on written verbalizations (e.g., written languaging, valid written explanations, diaries, written reflections) and discusses their possible roles as data collection instruments for the study of writing processes. We first describe general procedures for collecting written verbalizations and then critically analyze (a) the type of research questions researchers can ask and answer by using written verbalizations; (b) methodological challenges researchers face and the possible solutions to circumvent those challenges; and (c) how L2 researchers can best elicit written verbalizations in L2 research. We conclude by suggesting four practical tips to researchers who wish to use written verbalizations as a data collection instrument in the study of writing processes.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Methodological procedures of written verbalizations
    • General description
    • Written verbalization prompts
    • Language of reporting
  • Research questions that can be answered using written verbalizations
  • Methodological challenges
  • Best practices in using written verbalizations
  • Conclusion
  • References
References (40)
References
Barkaoui, K. (2011). Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating: An empirical study of their veridicality and reactivity. Language Testing, 28, 51–75. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boggs, J. A. (2019). Effects of teacher-scaffolded and self-scaffolded corrective feedback compared to direct corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy in English L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989). Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science, 13, 145–182. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 81–141. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis (2nd ed.). The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fukuta, J., Tamura, Y., & Kawaguchi, Y. (2019). Written languaging with indirect feedback in writing revision: Is feedback always effective? Language Awareness, 28, 1–14. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 459–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanaoka, O., & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 332–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoogerheide, V., Deijkers, L., Loyens, S. M. M., Heijltjes, A., & van Gog, T. (2016). Gaining from explaining: Learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them. Contemporary Education Psychology, 44–45, 95–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, M. (2018). Written languaging, learners’ proficiency levels and L2 grammar learning. System, 74, 50–61. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, M., & Révész, A. (2020). L2 Learning and the frequency and quality of written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 220–240). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(in preparation). Written languaging, learners’ aptitude, and L2 learning through dictogloss tasks. In S. Li (Ed.,). Individual differences in task-based language learning and teaching. John Benjamins.
Ishikawa, M., & Suzuki, W. (2016). The effect of written languaging on learning the hypothetical conditional in English. System, 58, 97–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ishikawa, M. & Suzuki, W. (2023). Effects of written languaging on second language learning: Mediating roles of aptitude. The Modern Language Journal, 107(S1), 95–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jacob, L., Lachner, A., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Learning by explaining orally or in written form? Text difficulty matters. Learning and Instruction, 68, 101344. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kasper, F. (1997). Assessing the metacognitve growth of ESL student writers. TESL-EJ, 3, 1–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, H. S. (2002). We talk, therefore we think? A cultural analysis of the effect of talking on thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 828–842. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachner, A., Jacob, L., & Hoogerheide, V. (2021). Learning by writing explanations: Is explaining to a fictitious student more effective than self-explaining? Learning and Instruction, 74, 101438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachner, A., Ly, K. -T., & Nückles, M. (2018). Providing written or oral explanations? Differential effects of the modality of explaining on students’ conceptual learning and transfer. Journal of Experimental Education, 86, 344–361. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachner, A., & Neuburg, C. (2019). Learning by writing explanations: Computer-based feedback about the explanatory cohesion enhances students’ transfer. Instructional Science, 47, 19–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa. F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 241–263). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moradian, M. R., Hossein-Nasab, M. H., & Miri, M. (2020). Effects of written languaging in response to direct and indirect corrective feedback on developing writing accuracy. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 267–286). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moradian, M. R., Miri, M., & Nasab, M. H. (2017). Contribution of written languaging to enhancing the efficiency of written corrective feedback. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 27, 406–421. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Negueruela, E. (2008). Revolutionary pedagogies: Learning that leads development in the second language classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 189–227). Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolás-Conesa, F., Manchón, R. M., & Cerezo, L. (2019). The effect of unfocused direct and indirect written corrective feedback on rewritten texts and new texts: Looking into feedback for accuracy and feedback for acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 848–873. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolás-Conesa, F., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2014). Development of EFL students’ mental models of writing and their effects on performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noro, T. (2004). A study of the metacognitive development of Japanese EFL writers: The validity of written feedback and correction in response to learners’ self-analysis of their writing. ARELE: Annual Review of English Education in Japan, 15, 179–188.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rittle-Johnson, B., Saylor, M., & Swygert, K. E. (2008). Learning from explaining: Does it matter if mom is listening? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 215–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written corrective feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sengupta, S., & Falvey, P. (1998). The role of teaching context in Hong Kong English teachers’ perceptions of L2 writing pedagogy. Evaluation & Research in Education, 12, 72–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simard, D., French, L., & Zuniga, M. (2017). Evolution of L2 self-repair behavior over time among adult learners of French. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20, 71–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simard, D., & Zuniga, M. (2020). Exploring the mediating role of emotions expressed in L2 written language in ESL learners text revision. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 287–307). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, W. (2012). Written languaging, direct correction, and second language writing revision. Language Learning, 62, 1110–1133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2017). The effects of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8, 461–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, W., & Itagaki, N. (2007). Learner metalinguistic reflections following output-oriented and reflective activities. Language Awareness, 16, 131–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2009). Languaging in grammar exercises by Japanese EFL learners of differing proficiency. System, 37, 217–225. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, W., & Storch, N. (2020). Introduction. In S. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 1–15). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swain, M. (2006a). Verbal protocols: What does it mean for research to use speaking as a data collection tool? In M. Chaloub-Deville, M. Chapelle, & P. Duff (Eds.), Inference and generalizability in applied linguistics: Multiple research perspectives (pp. 97–113). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2006b). Languaging, agency, and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2010). Talking it through: Languaging as a source of learning. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 112–130). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue