Cover not available

In:Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 84103

References (67)
References
Anthony, L. (2004, 10 december). AntConc: A learner and classroom friendly, multi-platform corpus analysis toolkit. In Proceedings of Interactive Workshop on Language E-learning (pp. 7–13). Waseda University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beddall-Hill, N., Jabbar, A., & Al Shehri, S. (2011). Social mobile devices as tools for qualitative research in education: iPhones and iPads in ethnography, interviewing, and design-based research. Journal of the Research Center for Educational Technology, 7(1), 67–90.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berdanier, C., & Zerbe, E. (2018, July 22–25). Quantitative investigation of engineering graduate student conceptions and processes of academic writing. 2018 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm), Toronto, Canada.
Biggs, J. B. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1988, April). Students’ approaches to essay-writing and the quality of the written product. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Biggs, J., Lai, P., Tang, C., & Lavelle, E. (1999). Teaching writing to ESL graduate students: A model and an illustration. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69(3), 293–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerrato-Lara, M., Castelló, M., Garcia Velazquez, R., & Lonka, K. (2017). Validation of the writing process questionnaire in two Hispanic populations: Spain and Mexico. Journal of Writing Research, 9(7), 151–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chae, S. E. (2011). Contributions of prior knowledge, motivation, and strategies to Korean college students’ L2 writing development (Doctoral dissertation). University of Maryland.
Chan, S., Bax, S., & Weir, C. (2017). Researching participants taking IELTS Academic Writing Task 2 (AWT2) in paper mode and in computer mode in terms of score equivalence, cognitive validity and other factors (Issue 2017/4). IELTS Research Reports Online Series. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chitez, M., & Kruse, O. (2012). Writing cultures and genres in European higher education. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 151–175). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chitez, M., Kruse, O., & Castelló, M. (2015). The European writing survey (EUWRIT): Background, structure, implementation, and some results (Working Papers in Applied Linguistics No. 9).
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2002). Research methods in education. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delcambre, I., & Donahue, C. (2012). Academic writing activity: Student writing in transition. In M. Castelló & C. Donahue (Eds.), University writing: Selves and texts in academic societies (pp. 129–149). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z., & Taguchi, T. (2010). Questionnaires in second language research construction, administration, and processing. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ericsson, K., & Simon, H. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (2nd ed.). The MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flick, U. (2018). Triangulation in data collection. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 527–544). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gourlay, L., & Oliver, M. (2016). Multimodal longitudinal journaling. In C. Haythornthwaite, R. Andrews, J. Fransman, & E. Meyers (Eds.), SAGE handbook of e-learning research (2nd ed., pp. 291–310). Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, S. (2013). Novice ESL writers: A longitudinal case-study of the situated academic writing processes of three undergraduates in a TESOL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(3), 180–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gubrium, J. F., & Holstein, J. A. (2002). From the individual interview to the interview society. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 3–32). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart-Davidson, W. (2007). Studying the mediated action of composing with time-use diaries. In H. A. McKee & D. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues (pp. 153–170). Hampton Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hort, S. (2017). Exploring the use of mobile technologies and process logs in writing research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). Skrivprocesser på högskolan: Text, plats och materialitet i uppsatsskrivandet (Doctoral dissertation). Örebro University.
Jang, Y., & Lee, J. (2019). The effects of ideal and ought-to L2 selves on Korean EFL learners’ writing strategy use and writing quality. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1129–1148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kessler, M. (2020). Technology-mediated writing: Exploring incoming graduate students’ L2 writing strategies with Activity Theory. Computers and Composition, 55, 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolb, K. H., Longest, K. C., & Jensen, M. J. (2013). Assessing the writing process: Do writing-intensive first-year seminars change how students write? Teaching Sociology, 41(1), 20–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lachmann, H., Ponzer, S., Johansson, U. -B., Benson, L., & Karlgren, K. (2013). Capturing students’ learning experiences and academic emotions at an interprofessional training ward. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(2), 137–145. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavelle, E. (1993). Development and validation of an inventory to assess processes in college composition. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 489–499. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(1997). Writing style and the narrative essay. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(4), 475–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavelle, E., Ball, S. C., & Maliszewski, G. (2013). Writing approaches of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(1), 60–63. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavelle, E., & Bushrow, K. (2007). Writing approaches of graduates students. Educational Psychology, 27(6), 807–822. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavelle, E., & Guarino, A. J. (2003). A multidimensional approach to understanding college writing processes. Educational Psycology, 23(3), 295–305. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavelle, E., & Zuercher, N. (2001). The writing approaches of university students. Higher Education, 42(3), 373–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2016). Understanding writing strategy use from a sociocultural perspective: The case of skilled and less skilled writers. System, 60, 105–116. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lonka, K. (1996). The writing process questionnaire. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lonka, K., Chow, A., Keskinen, J., Hakkarainen, K., Sandström, N., & Pyhältö, K. (2014). How to measure PhD. students’ conceptions of academic writing – and are they related to well-being? Journal of Writing Research, 5(3), 245–269. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lonka, K., Ketonen, E., Vekkaila, J., Cerrato Lara, M., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). Doctoral students’ writing profiles and their relations to well-being and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 77(4), 587–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing. Language Learning, 57(4), 549–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mann, S. (2016). The research interview. Reflective practice and reflexivity in research processes. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melo, J., Zerbe, E., & Berdanier, C. G. (2019, June 6). Validating a short form writing attitudes survey for engineering writers. 126th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Florida, United States.
Nelson, J. (1993). The library revisited: Exploring students research processes. In A. M. Penrose & B. M. Sitko (Eds.), Hearing ourselves think: Cognitive Research in the College Writing Classroom (pp. 102–122). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nicolás-Conesa, F., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2014). Development of EFL students’ mental models of writing and their effects on performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 24, 1–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Zapf, D., & Niessen, C. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oppenheim, A. N., (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrić, B., & Czárl, B. (2003). Validating a writing strategy questionnaire. System, 31(2), 187–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, P. (2004). Tracing process: How texts come into being. In P. Prior & C. Bazerman (Eds.), What writing does and how it does it (pp. 173–206). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art (fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303–323. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riazi, A. M. (2016). The Routledge encyclopedia of research methods in applied linguistics. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J. R., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 30–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roderick, R. (2019). Self-regulation and rhetorical problem solving: How graduate students adapt to an unfamiliar writing project. Written Communication, 36(3), 410–436. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roozen, K. (2010). Tracing trajectories of practice: Repurposing in one student’s developing disciplinary writing processes. Written Communication, 27(3), 318–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roth, A., Ogrin, S., & Schmitz, B. (2016). Assessing self-regulated learning in higher education: A systematic literature review of self-report instruments. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(3), 225–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2004). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmeck, R. R., Geisler-Brenstein, E., & Cercy, S. P. (1991). Self-concept and learning: The revised inventory of learning processes. Educational Psychology, 11(3–4), 343–362. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segev-Miller, R. (2005). Writing-to-learn: Conducting a process log. In G. Rijlaarsdam, H. van den Bergh, & M. Couzijn (Eds.), Effective learning and teaching of writing (pp. 533–546). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stapleton, P. (2010). Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 295–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torrance, M., Thomas, G. V., & Robinson, E. J. (1994). The writing strategies of graduate research students in the social sciences. Higher Education, 27(3), 379–392. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2000). Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: A longitudinal study. Higher Education, 39(2), 181–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wei, X., Zhang, L. J., & Zhang, W. (2020). Associations of L1-to-L2 rhetorical transfer with L2 writers’ perception of L2 writing difficulty and L2 writing proficiency. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 47, 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wingate, U., & Harper, R. (2021). Completing the first assignment: A case study of the writing processes of a successful and an unsuccessful student. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 49, 100948. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, L., & Shi, L. (2003). Exploring six MBA students’ summary writing by introspection. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2(3), 165–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Youngyan, L. (2012). Undergraduate students searching and reading Web sources for writing. Educational Media International, 49(3), 201–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhi, M., & Huang, B. (2021). Investigating the authenticity of computer-and paper-based ESL writing tests. Assessing Writing, 50, 100548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue