Cover not available

In:Research Methods in the Study of L2 Writing Processes
Edited by Rosa M. Manchón and Julio Roca de Larios
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 5] 2023
► pp. 6–31

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
The study of L2 writing processes

Lines and methods of inquiry

 | University of Murcia
 | University of Murcia
Published online: 23 October 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.5.01man
This introductory chapter serves two main purposes. One is to contextualize the book within the larger professional discussion, which we do through a look-back approach in order to provide a synthetic review of the main lines of research in the study of L2 writing processes and the main research instruments employed. The second aim of the chapter is to introduce readers to the aims, structure, and contents of the book.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Writing processes in L2 writing research
  • Theoretical approaches and main research directions in the study of L2  writing processes
    • Writing processes
      • Cognitively-oriented studies of writing processes
      • Socio-cultural, ethnographically-oriented studies of writing processes and text production processes
    • Feedback processing
  • Methodological considerations in the study of L2 writing processes and feedback processing
    • Writing and text production processes
    • Feedback processing
  • The present book
    • Aims and scope
    • Structure and contents
  • Final comments
  • References
References (92)
References
Barkaoui, K. (2016). What and when second-language learners revise when responding to timed writing tasks on the computer: The roles of task type, second language proficiency, and keyboarding skills. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 320–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2019). What can L2 writers’ pausing behavior tell us about their L2 writing processes? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 529–554. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beare, S., & Bourdages, J. (2007). Skilled writers’ generating strategies in L1 and L2: An exploratory study. In M. Torrance, L. Van Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Writing and cognition. Research and applications (pp. 151–161). Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bitchener, J. (2019). The interaction between SLA and feedback research. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 85–105). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bowles, M., & Gastañaga, K (2022). Heritage, second and third language learner processing of written corrective feedback: Evidence from think-alouds. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 677–698. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breuer, E. O. (2019). Fluency in L1 and FL writing: An analysis of planning, essay writing and final revision. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 190–211). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caras, A. (2019). Written corrective feedback in compositions and the role of depth of processing. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 188–200). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerezo, L., Manchón, R. M., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2019). What do learners notice while processing written corrective feedback? A look at depth of processing via written languaging. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 173–187). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, S. (2017). Using keystroke logging to understand writers’ processes on a reading-into-writing test. Language Testing in Asia, 7. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chenoweth, N. A., & Hayes, J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing: Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18(1), 80–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chukharev-Hudilainen, E., Saricaouglu, A., Torrance, M., & Feng, H-H. (2019). Combined deployable keystroke logging and eye tracking for investigating L2 writing fluency. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 583–604. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2014). Exploring the role played by error correction and models on children’s reported noticing and output production in a L2 writing task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36, 451–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle, Y., Cánovas-Guirao, J., & Roca de Larios, J. (2018). Identifying the trajectories of young EFL learners across multi-stage writing and feedback processing tasks with model texts. Journal of Second Language Writing, 42, 25–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coyle Y., & Roca de Larios, J. (2020). Exploring young learners’ engagement with models as a written corrective technique in EFL and CLIL settings. System, 95, 102374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Criado, R., Garcés, A., & Plonsky, L. (2022). Models as written corrective feedback: Effects on young L2 learners’ fluency in digital writing from product and process perspectives. Studies in Second Language Learning & Teaching, 12(4), 699–721. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruz, B., Cerezo, L., & Nicolás-Conesa, F. (2022). A classroom-based study on the effects of WCF on accuracy in pen-and-paper versus computer-mediated collaborative writing. Studies in Second Language Learning & Teaching, 12(4), 623–650. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Silva, R., & Graham, S. (2015). The effects of strategy instruction on writing strategy use for students of different proficiency levels. System, 53, 47–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferenz, O. (2005). First and second language use during planning processes. In T. Kostouli (Ed), Writing in context(s): Textual practices and learning processes in sociocultural settings (pp. 185–205). Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galbraith, D. (2009). Cognitive models of writing. German as a Foreign Language, 2–3, 7–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Galbraith, D., & Vedder, I. (2019). Methodological advances in investigating L2 writing processes. Challenges and perspectives. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 633–645. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gánem-Gutiérrez, G. A., & Gilmore, A. (2018). Tracking the real-time evolution of a writing event: Second language writers at different proficiency levels. Language Learning, 68(2), 469–506. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Hernández, J., Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2017). Reformulation as a problem-solving space for young EFL writers: A longitudinal study of language learning strategies. In M. P. García Mayo (Ed.) Learning foreign languages in primary school. Research insights (pp. 193–222). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gass, S. (1997). Input, interaction, and the second language learner. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, S. (2013). Novice ESL writers: A longitudinal case-study of the situated academic writing processes of three undergraduates in a TESOL context. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(3), 180–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamel, M. -J., Séror, J., & Dion, C. (2015). Writers in action: Modelling and scaffolding second-language learners’ writing process. Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 31–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanaoka, O. (2007). Output, noticing, and learning: An investigation into the role of spontaneous attention to form in a four-stage writing task. Language Teaching Research, 11, 459–479. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanaoka, O. & Izumi, S. (2012). Noticing and uptake: Addressing pre-articulated covert problems in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 332–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2012). Evidence from language bursts, revision, and transcription for translation and its relation to other writing processes. In M. Fayol, D. Alamargot, & V. Berninger (Eds.), Translation of thought to written text while composing (pp. 15–25). Psychology Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kellogg, R. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 57–72). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2001). Competition for working memory among writing processes. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 175–191. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kim, H. R., & Bowles, M. (2019). How deeply do second language learners process written corrective feedback? Insights gained from think-alouds. TESOL Quarterly, 4, 913–938. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knospe, Y., Sullivan, K., Malmqvist, A., & Valfridsson, I. (2019). Observing writing and website browsing: Swedish students write L3 German (pp. 258–254). In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting. Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lei, X. (2008). Exploring a sociocultural approach to writing strategy research: Mediated actions in writing activities. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(4), 217–236. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L. Schover, K. & Hayes, J. R. (2014). Writing in the workplace: Constructing documents using multiple digital sources. Journal of writing Research, 5(3), 285–337. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leijten, M., Van Waes, L., Schrijver, I., Bernolet, S., & Vangehuchten, L. (2019). Mapping master’s students’ use of external sources in source-based writing in L1 and L2. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 555–582. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R. P. (2015). Explicit learning in the L2 classroom: A student-centered approach. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020). L2 writing-to-learn: Theory, research, and a curricular approach. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas. John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R., & Suh, B-R. (2021). Theoretical perspectives on writing, written corrective feedback, and language learning in individual writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of SLA and writing (pp. 9–21). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R., & Manchón, R. M. (2021). Expanding research agendas: Directions for future research agendas on writing, WCF, language learning, and ISLA. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of SLA and writing. Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leow, R. P., Thinglum, A., & Leow, S. A. (2022). WCF processing in the L2 curriculum: A look at type of WCF, type of linguistic item, and L2 performance. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 12(4), 653–675. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J. & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically-motivated and empirically-based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 503–527. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López-Serrano, S., Roca de Larios, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2020). Processing output during L2 individual writing tasks: An exploration of depth of processing and the effects of proficiency. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 231–253). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M. (2018). Past and future research agendas on writing strategies: Conceptualizations, inquiry methods, and research findings. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 247–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020a). Writing and language learning. Looking back and moving forward. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 3–26). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2020b). The language learning potential of L2 writing: Moving forward in theory and research. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 405–426). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2021). The contribution of ethnographically-oriented approaches to the study of writing processes. In I. Guillén-Galve & A. Bocanegra-Valle (Eds.), Ethnographies of academic writing research. Theory, methods, and interpretation (pp. 83–103). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). The psycholinguistics of second language writing. In A. Godfroid & H. Hopp (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and psycholinguistics (pp. 400–412). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Leow, R. P. (2020). An ISLA perspective on L2 learning through writing. Implications for future research agendas. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 335–355). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Nicolás-Conesa, F., Cerezo, L., & Criado, R. (2020). L2 writers’ processing of written corrective feedback: Depth of processing via written languaging. In W. Suzuki & N. Storch (Eds.), Languaging in language learning and teaching (pp. 241–265). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Roca de Larios, J. (2007). On the temporal nature of planning in L1 and L2 composing. Language Learning, 57, 549–593. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J., & Murphy, L. (2007). A review of writing strategies: Focus on conceptualizations and impact of the first language. In A. Cohen & E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 229–250). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., Roca de Larios, J. & Murphy, L. (2009). The temporal dimension and problem-solving nature of foreign language composing processes. Implications for theory. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing in foreign language contexts: Learning, teaching and research (pp. 102–124). Multilingual Matters. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Vasylets, O. (2019). Language learning through writing: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In J. B. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 341–362). Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manchón, R. M., & Williams, J. (2016). L2 writing and SLA studies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), The handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 567–586). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M., Révész, A., Lu, X., Kourtali, N. E., Lee, M., & Borges, L. (2020). Investigating L2 writing processes across independent and integrated tasks: A mixed-methods study. Second Language Research, 36(3), 277–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Michel, M., Stiefenhöfer, L., Verspoor, M., & Manchón, R. M. (2021). L2 Writing processes and language learning in individual and collaborative conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of SLA and writing (pp. 67–80). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, L., & Roca de Larios, J. (2010). Searching for words: One strategic use of the mother tongue by advanced Spanish EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(2), 61–8. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, E. S., & Kim, O. Y. (2019). Learners’ use of indirect written corrective feedback: Depth of processing and self-correction. In R. P. Leow (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language research in classroom learning (pp. 214–228). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Park, K., & Kinginger, C. (2010). Writing/thinking in real time: Digital video and corpus query analysis. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 31–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plakans L. (2008). Comparing composing in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13, 111–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Polio, C. (2012). The relevance of second language acquisition theory to the written error correction debate. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 375–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Prior, P. (2015). Writing, literate activity, semiotic remediation. A sociocultural approach. In G. Cislaru (Ed.), Writing(s) at the crossroads. The process-product interface (pp. 185–201). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész A, Kourtali, N. E., & Mazgutova, D. (2016). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67, 208–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész A, Michel M, & Lee M. J. (2017). Investigating IELTS Academic Writing Task 2: Relationships between cognitive writing processes, text quality, and working memory. IELTS Research Report. The British Council. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviors: A mixed-methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 605–631. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(2023). An exploration of the relationship of working memory to pausing and revision behaviors at different stages of writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., & Coyle, Y. (2021). Written corrective processing in individual and collaborative writing conditions. In R. M. Manchón & C. Polio (Eds.), Handbook of SLA and writing (pp. 81–93). Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., García Hernández, J., & Coyle, Y. (2021). A theoretically-grounded classification of EFL children’s formulation strategies in collaborative writing. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 3(2), 330–336. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Marín, J., & Murphy, L. (2001). A temporal analysis of formulation processes in L1 and L2 writing. Language Learning, 51, 497–538. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Manchón, R., Murphy, L., & Marín, J. (2008). The foreign language writer’s strategic behavior in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 30–47. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roca de Larios, J., Nicolás-Conesa, F., & Coyle, Y. (2016). Focus on writers: Processes and strategies. In R. M. Manchón & P. K. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 267–286). De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sachs, R., & Polio, C. (2007). Learners’ uses of two types of written feedback on an L2 writing revision task. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Séror, J. (2013). Screen capture technology: A digital window into students’ writing processes. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 39(3), 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smith, B. E., Pacheco, M. B., & De Almeida, C. R. (2017). Multimodal codemeshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across models of language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 6–22. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006). Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 201–233. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stiefenhöfer, L., & Michel, M. (2020). Investigating the relationship between peer interaction and writing processes in computer-supported collaborative L2 writing: A mixed-methods study. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 255–279). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Suzuki, W. (2017). The effect of quality of written languaging on second language learning. Writing & Pedagogy, 8(3), 461–482. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tillema, M. (2012). Writing in first and second language: Empirical studies on text quality and writing processes (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University. Lot Publications.
Tiryakioglu, G., Peters, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2019). The effect of L2 proficiency level on composing processes of EFL learners: Data from keystroke Loggings, think alouds and questionnaires. In E. Lindgren & K. Sullivan (Eds.), Observing writing. Insights from keystroke logging and handwriting (pp. 212–235). Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Torres, J. (2023). Exploring working memory and language dominance in heritage bilinguals’ writing behaviors. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uscinski, I. (2017). L2 learners’ engagement with direct written corrective feedback in first year composition courses. Journal of Response to Writing, 3(2), 36–62. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Van Weijen, D., van den Bergh, H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Sanders, T. (2009). L1 use during L2 writing: An empirical study of a complex phenomenon. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 235–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wang, W., & Wen, Q. (2002). L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 11, 225–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Williams, J. (2012). The potential role(s) of writing in second language development. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321–331. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xu, C., & Qi, Y. (2017). Analyzing pauses in computer-assisted EFL writing – A computer keystroke-Log perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 20(4), 24–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yasuda, S. (2005). Different activities in the same task: An Activity Theory approach to ESL students’ writing process. JALT Journal, 27(2), 139–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zalbidea, J. (2020). A mixed-methods approach to exploring the L2 learning potential of writing versus speaking. In R. M. Manchón (Ed.), Writing and language learning. Advancing research agendas (pp. 207–230). John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Martín, Ricardo Muñoz, Sanjun Sun, Zhiqiang Du & Sara Puerini
2025. Keylogging. In Research Methods in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies [Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 10], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Shahri, Naseh & Saeed Karimi-Aghdam
2025. Digitally Mediated Micro-processes of Novice Multilingual Writers: Textualization in Focus. Written Communication 42:3 ► pp. 633 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue