In:Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss and YouJin Kim
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3] 2022
► pp. 207–232
Chapter 9Grammar
Documenting growth in L2 classrooms
Published online: 8 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.09tot
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.09tot
Abstract
Meaningfully assessing the effect of instruction on second language (L2) grammatical development requires research that credibly relates observed learner behaviors to relevant theories of language and language learning. After defining the role of grammar in meaningful language use, this chapter compares cognitive and social views of grammatical development to identify key constructs for exploration in ISLA research. It illustrates the relationship between theory and L2 elicitation strategies by first outlining general principles and then describing the design of acceptability judgment tasks and picture description tasks in detail, along with a framework for working with classroom recordings. Specific examples from the author’s research in U.S. high school L2 Spanish classrooms on explicit grammar instruction will be provided. Advice to future researchers will center on empowering readers to find optimal research designs through awareness of the questions about teaching and learning they wish to explore.
Article outline
- 1.What is grammar and why is it important?
- 2.What we know and what we need to know about grammatical development in ISLA
- 2.1Cognitive approaches to investigating grammar learning
- 2.2Social approaches to investigating grammar
- 3.Data elicitation and interpretation options and step-by-step guidelines for grammar research
- 3.1Operationalizing grammatical development
- 3.2Operationalizing grammatical knowledge
- 3.3Data elicitation options
- 3.3.1Acceptability judgment tasks (AJTs)
- 3.3.2Picture description tasks (PDTs)
- 3.3.3Qualitative data collection
- 3.4Examples of published research on instructed grammatical development
- 4.Advice to future grammar researchers
- 5.Troubleshooting grammar research
- 6.Conclusions
- 7.Further reading and additional resources
- 7.1Suggested books
- 7.2Suggested journals
- 7.3Suggested professional organizations and web resources
References
References (57)
Adair-Hauck, B., & Donato, R. (2016). PACE: A story-based approach for dialogic inquiry about form and meaning. In J. L. Shrum & E. W. Glisan (Eds.), Teacher’s handbook: Contextualized language instruction (5th ed.) (pp. 206–230). Cengage Learning.
Baars, B. J., & Franklin, S. (2003). How conscious experience and working memory interact. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(4), 166–172.
Bernard, H. R. (2018). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (6th ed.). Rowman & Littlefield.
Bowles, M. A. (2018). Introspective verbal reports: Think-alouds and stimulated recall. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 339–357). Palgrave Macmillan.
Cowan, N. (2014). Working memory underpins cognitive development, learning, and education. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 197–223.
Davin, K. J. (2016). Classroom dynamic assessment: A critical examination of constructs and practices. Modern Language Journal, 100(4), 813–829.
De Costa, P., Valmori, L., & Choi, I. (2017). Qualitative research methods. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 522–540). Routledge.
DeKeyser, R. M. (2017). Knowledge and skill in ISLA. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 15–21). Routledge.
Duff, P. A. (2014). Case study research on language learning and use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 233–255.
Ellis, N. C. (2015). Implicit AND explicit language learning: Their dynamic interface and complexity. In P. Rebuschat (Ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages (pp. 3–23). John Benjamins.
Ellis, R. (2009). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 31–64). Multilingual Matters.
Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. Language Learning, 65(1), 33–62.
García, P. N. (2018). Concept-based instruction: Investigating the role of conscious conceptual manipulation in L2 development. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 181–196). Routledge.
Godfroid, A. (2020). Eye tracking in second language acquisition and bilingualism: A research synthesis and methodological guide. Routledge.
Grey, S., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2018). Psycholinguistic methods. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 287–312). Palgrave Macmillan.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.
Huth, T. (2021). Conceptualizing interactional learning targets for the second language curriculum. In S. Kunitz, N. Markee, & O. Sert (Eds.), Classroom-based conversation analytic research: Theoretical and applied perspectives on pedagogy (pp. 359–381).
Kim, J., & Nam, H. (2017). Measures of implicit knowledge revisited: Processing modes, time pressure, and modality. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(3), 431–457.
Kim, Y., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Jung, Y. (2016). A measure of proficiency or short-term memory? Validation of an elicited imitation test for SLA research. Modern Language Journal, 100(3), 655–673.
Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/praxis divide. Routledge.
Lantolf, J. P., & Zhang, X. (2017). Concept-based language instruction. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 146–165). Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. E., & Tedick, D. J. (2016). Teaching world languages: Thinking differently. In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (5th ed.) (pp. 1335–1387). American Educational Research Association.
Lew, S., Yang, A. H., & Harklau, L. (2018). Qualitative methodology. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 79–101). Palgrave Macmillan.
Loewen, S. (2018). Instructed second language acquisition. In A. Phakiti, P. De Costa, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 663–680). Palgrave Macmillan.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Maie, R., & Godfroid, A. (2022). Controlled and automatic processing in the acceptability judgment task: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 72(1), 158–197.
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2019). Second language learning theories (4th ed.). Routledge.
Nassaji, H. (2017). Grammar acquisition. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 205–223). Routledge.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. John Benjamins.
Philp, J., Adams, R. J., & Iwashita, N. (2014). Peer interaction and second language learning. Routledge.
Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods. In S. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 505–521). Routledge.
Plonsky, L., Marsden, E., Crowther, D., Gass, S. M., & Spinner, P. (2020). A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research. Second Language Research, 36(4), 583–621.
Poehner, M. E. (2018). Probing and provoking L2 development: The object of mediation in dynamic assessment and mediated development. In J. P. Lantolf, M. E. Poehner, & M. Swain (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of sociocultural theory and second language development (pp. 249–265). Routledge.
Poehner, M. E., van Compernolle, R. A., Esteve, O., & Lantolf, J. P. (2019). A Vygotskian developmental approach to second language education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 17(3), 238–259.
Spada, N. (2015). SLA research and L2 pedagogy: Misapplications and questions of relevance. Language Teaching, 48(1), 69–81.
Spinner, P., & Gass, S. M. (2019). Using judgments in second language acquisition research. Routledge.
Suzuki, Y. (2017). Validity of new measures of implicit knowledge: Distinguishing implicit knowledge from automatized explicit knowledge. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38(5), 1229–1261.
Suzuki, Y., & DeKeyser, R. (2017). The interface of explicit and implicit knowledge in a second language: Insights from individual differences in cognitive aptitudes. Language Learning, 67(4), 747–790.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural theory in second language education: An introduction through narratives (2nd ed.). Multilingual Matters.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337.
Taguchi, N., Gomez-Laich, M. P., & Arrufat-Marques, M.-J. (2016). Comprehension of indirect meaning in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 49(4), 677–698.
Toth, P. D. (2004). When grammar instruction undermines cohesion in L2 Spanish classroom discourse. Modern Language Journal, 88(1), 14–30.
(2021a). Classroom transcripts. Materials from “What do the Data Show? Multiple Perspectives on Classroom L2 Learning from a Single Data Set” [Data: Transcriptions]. IRIS Database, University of York, UK.
(2021b). Test scores from the grammaticality judgment task. Materials from “What do the data show? Multiple perspectives on classroom L2 learning from a single data set” [Data: Scores on measures / tests]. IRIS Database, University of York, UK.
(2021c). Test scores from the picture description task. Materials from “What do the Data Show? Multiple Perspectives on Classroom L2 Learning from a Single Data Set” [Data: Scores on measures / tests]. IRIS Database University of York, UK.
(Ed.). (2022). What do the data show? Multiple perspectives on classroom L2 learning from a single data set [Special issue]. Language Learning 72(S1).
Toth, P. D., & Davin, K. J. (2016). The sociocognitive imperative of L2 pedagogy. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 1), 148–168.
Toth, P. D., & Moranski, K. (2018). Why haven’t we solved instructed SLA? A sociocognitive account. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 73–89.
Toth, P. D., Wagner, E., & Moranski, K. (2013). ‘Co-constructing’ explicit L2 knowledge with high school Spanish learners through guided induction. Applied Linguistics, 34(3), 255–278.
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2018). Implications of the declarative/procedural model for improving second language learning: The role of memory enhancement techniques. Second Language Research, 34(1), 39–65.
van Compernolle, R. A. (2019). The qualitative science of Vygotskian sociocultural psychology and L2 development. In J. W. Schwieter & A. G. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 62–83). Cambridge University Press.
van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf & M. E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages (pp. 163–186). Equinox.