In:Instructed Second Language Acquisition Research Methods
Edited by Laura Gurzynski-Weiss and YouJin Kim
[Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3] 2022
► pp. 3–28
Chapter 1Getting started
Key considerations
Published online: 8 December 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.01gur
https://doi.org/10.1075/rmal.3.01gur
Abstract
This introductory chapter orients the reader to both instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) and research methods in general. We begin with an operationalization of ISLA, followed by an outline of the main research questions and overarching goals within ISLA, and specification of the differences between an applied orientation to research and simply drawing pedagogical implications. In the second half of the chapter, we move into the nature and ultimate aims of research (i.e., theoretical, empirical, applied), in general, and for the specific field of ISLA. We highlight the importance of connecting to and building off prior work and how research contributions must be connected to disciplinary discussions as well as previous scholarly work as well as being ethically sound. Finally, we outline the basics of research decision-making and walk the reader through each of the principal considerations during the design phase of a study.
Article outline
- 1.Introducing instructed second language acquisition: Defining the domain
- 1.1What is ISLA? How does it differ from SLA and applied linguistics?
- 1.2Overarching goals of ISLA
- 1.3Common assumptions across theories of ISLA
- 2.Global issues in ISLA research
- 2.1Key questions and considerations in ISLA research
- 2.1.1How are L2s learned in instructed contexts?
- 2.1.2What is the nature of the L2 knowledge gained in instructed contexts?
- 2.1.3How do variables related to instructional contexts influence the L2 learning process?
- 2.1.4How do individual differences play a role in instructed L2 learning?
- 2.1.5What do SLA theories and research say about the effectiveness of L2 instruction? What instructional techniques are most likely to facilitate ISLA?
- 2.2Ultimate aims of scientific research in general and in ISLA
- 2.2.1Theoretical aims
- 2.2.2Empirical aims
- 2.2.3Applied aims
- 2.3State of the field in ISLA research methods
- 2.1Key questions and considerations in ISLA research
- 3.Conceptualizing your study
- 3.1Connecting to and building off prior research
- 3.2Designing your study: Questions to ask yourself
- 4.Research with human subjects
- 4.1Exempt research studies
- 4.2Expedited research studies
- 4.3Preparing your protocol
- 4.4Research that supports DEIA principles
- 5.Conclusions
- 6.Further reading
- Introducing ISLA
- Research methods in ISLA
- Ethical considerations in ISLA research
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (68)
Back, M. (2020). Interlocutor differences and the role of social others in a Spanish peer tutoring context. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 99–123). John Benjamins.
Bowles, M., Adams, R., & Toth, P. (2014). A comparison of L2-L2 and L2-HL interactions in Spanish language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 98(2), 497–517.
Cheng, A. C. (2002). The effects of processing instruction on the acquisition of ser and estar. Hispania, 85(2), 308–323.
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism Language and Cognition 10(1), 7–21.
De Costa, P., Li, W., & Rawal, H. (2019). Qualitative classroom methods. In J. Schweiter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp. 113–136). Cambridge.
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–348). Wiley-Blackwell.
Douglas Fir Group. (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. Modern Language Journal, 100(Supplement 2016), 19–47.
(2009). Implicit and explicit learning, knowledge, and instruction. In R. Ellis, S. Loewen, C. Elder, R. Erlam, J. Philp, & H. Reinders (Eds.), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching (pp. 3–25). Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 339–368.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (Eds., 2009), Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing, and teaching. Multilingual Matters.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2020). Usage-based approaches to L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 63–85). Routledge.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2014). Interaction approaches. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition. Routledge.
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2020). Input, interaction, and output in L2 acquisition. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 192–222). Routledge.
Geeslin, K. (2000). A new approach to the study of the SLA of copula choice. In R. Leow & C. Sanz (Eds.), Spanish applied linguistics at the turn of the millennium (pp. 50–66). Cascadilla Press.
(2003). A comparison of copula choice in advanced and native Spanish. Language Learning, 53(4), 703–764.
Geeslin, K., & Long, A. Y. (2015). The development and use of the Spanish copula with adjectives by Korean-speaking learners. In I. Pérez-Jiménez, M. Leonetti, & S. Gumiel-Molina (Eds.), New perspectives on the study of ser and estar (pp. 293–324). John Benjamins.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (Ed.). (2017). Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors. John Benjamins.
(Ed.). (2020). Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences. John Benjamins.
Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Look who’s interacting: A scoping review of research involving non-teacher/non-peer interlocutors. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach (pp. 306–324). John Benjamins.
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.). (2020). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.
IU Human Resource Protection Program. (2021a, January 19). HRPP Policy- Exempt Research. Indiana University Research. Retrieved on 2 June 2022 from [URL]
. (2021b, January 19). HRPP Policy- IRB Review Process. Indiana University Research. Retrieved on 2 June 2022 from [URL]
Kagan, O., Carreira, M., & Chik, C. (2017). The Routledge handbook of heritage language education: From innovation to program building. Routledge.
Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Trego, D. (2020). Synchronous VCMC with TalkAbroad: Exploring noticing, transcription, and learner perceptions in Spanish foreign-language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research.
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130.
(2012). Task complexity, learning opportunities, and Korean EFL learners’ question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34(4), 627–658.
Kim, Y., Choi, B., Yun, H., Kim, B., & Choi, S. (in press). Task repetition, synchronous written corrective feedback, and the learning of Korean grammar: A classroom-based study. Language Teaching Research.
Lantolf, J. P. (2020). I~ You> I~ Me. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 79–97). John Benjamins.
Larson-Hall, J. (2015). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS and R. Routledge.
Leow, R. P. (2000). A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior: Aware versus unaware learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 557–584.
(2018). ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 1–18.
Loewen, S., Crowther, D., Isbell, D. R., Kim, K. M., Maloney, J., Miller, Z. F., & Rawal, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL, 31(3), 293–311.
Loewen, S., Isbell, D. R., & Sporn, Z. (2020). The effectiveness of app-based language instruction for developing receptive linguistic knowledge and oral communicative ability. Foreign Language Annals, 53(2), 209–233.
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141.
(1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.
Long, A. Y., & Geeslin, K. L. (2020). Examining the role of instructor first language in classroom-based oral input. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 127–157). John Benjamins.
Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction, and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(4), 557–587.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2022). Second language research: Methodology and design (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Nakatsukasa, K. (2017). Gender and recasts. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 100–119). John Benjamins.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528.
Payant, C. & Kim, Y. (2019). Impact of task modality on collaborative dialogue among plurilingual learners: A classroom-based study. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22(5), 614–627.
Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31(2), 267–278.
Plonsky, L., Eggbert, J., & LaFlair, G. (2015). Bootstrapping in applied linguistics: Assessing its potential using shared data. Applied Linguistics, 36(5), 591–610.
Ryan, J., & B. Lafford. (1992). Acquisition of lexical meaning in a study abroad environment: Ser and estar and the Granada experience. Hispania, 75(3), 714–722.
Schmitt, N., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2020). An overview of applied linguistics. In N. Schmitt & M. P. H. Rodgers (Eds.), An introduction to applied linguistics (3rd ed.) (pp. 1–15). Routledge.
Serafini, E. J. (2020). The impact of learner perceptions of interlocutor IDs on learner possible selves during a short-term experience abroad. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Cross-theoretical explorations of interlocutors and their individual differences (pp. 210–243). John Benjamins.
Serafini, E. J., & Sanz, C. (2016). Evidence for the decreasing impact of cognitive ability on second language development as proficiency increases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(4), 607–646.
Shintani, N., Li, S., & Ellis, R. (2013). Comprehension-based versus production-based instruction: A meta-analysis of comparative studies. Language Learning, 63(2), 296–329.
Sonbul, S., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions. Language Learning, 63(1), 121–159.
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60(2), 263–308.
Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 495–508). Routledge.
Taguchi, N. (2015). Instructed pragmatics at a glance: Where instructional studies were, are, and should be going. Language Teaching, 48(1), 1–50.
Toomer, M., & Elgort, I. (2019). The development of implicit and explicit knowledge of collocations: A conceptual replication and extension of Sonbul and Schmitt (2013). Language Learning, 69(2), 405–439.
Valdés, G. (2000). Introduction. In L. Sandstedt (Ed.), Spanish for native speakers. Harcourt College.
VanPatten, B. (1987). Classroom learners’ acquisition of ser and estar: Accounting for developmental patterns. In B. VanPatten, T. Dvorak, & J. F. Lee (Eds.), Foreign language learning: A research perspective (pp. 61–75). Newbury House.
VanPatten, B., & Williams, J. (2015). Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.) (pp. 1–16). Routledge.
VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (2020). Introduction: The nature of theories. In B. VanPatten, G. D. Keating, & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
Williams, J. N. (2004). Implicit learning of form-meaning connections. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, & M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp. 203–218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ziegler, N., & Smith, G. (2017). Teachers’ provision of feedback in L2 text-chat. In L. Gurzynski-Weiss (Ed.), Expanding individual difference research in the interaction approach: Investigating learners, instructors, and other interlocutors (pp. 255–279). John Benjamins.
